Patient race and the likelihood of undergoing bariatric surgery among patients seeking surgery.

BACKGROUND: Ethnic minority adults have disproportionately higher rates of obesity than Caucasians but are less likely to undergo bariatric surgery. Recent data suggest that minorities might be less likely to seek surgery. Whether minorities who seek surgery are also less likely to proceed with surgery is unclear. METHODS: We interviewed 651 patients who sought bariatric surgery at two academic medical centers to examine whether ethnic minorities are less likely to proceed with surgery than Caucasians and whether minorities who do proceed with surgery have higher illness burden than their counterparts. We collected patient demographics and abstracted clinical data from the medical records. We then conducted multivariable analyses to examine the association between race and the likelihood of proceeding with bariatric surgery within 1 year of initial interview and to compare the illness burden by race and ethnicity among those who underwent surgery. RESULTS: Of our study sample, 66% were Caucasian, 18% were African-American, and 12% were Hispanics. After adjustment for socioeconomic factors, there were no racial differences in who proceeded with bariatric surgery. Among those who proceeded with surgery, illness burden was comparable between minorities and Caucasian patients with the exception that African-Americans were underrepresented among those with reflux disease (0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.7) and depression (0.4, 0.2-0.7), and overrepresented among those with anemia (4.8, 2.4-9.6) than Caucasian patients. CONCLUSIONS: Race and ethnicity were not independently associated with likelihood of proceeding with bariatric surgery. Minorities who proceeded with surgery did not clearly have higher illness burden than Caucasian patients.

Data collection systems for weight loss surgery: an evidence-based assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the existence and efficacy of data collection systems for weight loss surgery (WLS) and establish evidence-based guidelines for the development of a statewide WLS registry in Massachusetts. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We conducted two systematic searches of English language literature in MEDLINE. The first was on data collection registries related to WLS; the second was an expanded search encompassing other surgical fields (e.g., cardiac and thoracic surgery) and registries (i.e., cancer). Fourteen articles were found to be pertinent. Data were extracted, and evidence categories were assigned according to a grading system based on established evidence-based models. Recommendations were derived from these literature reviews and expert opinion. RESULTS: This task group found that there are no standardized data collection systems for WLS in Massachusetts (or any other states) and no mandated reporting of WLS-specific outcomes. We described existing WLS databases and systems in other surgical fields. Recommendations focused on the importance and feasibility of data collection for WLS and the need to conduct a pilot study and explore options for creating a statewide WLS database. DISCUSSION: A statewide WLS data collection system would optimize patient care by enabling the collection, analysis, and dissemination of best practice data. A broad-based effort is needed to meet challenges involved in defining and implementing such a system.

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal versus Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy: cost comparison at teaching hospitals.

Laparoscopic hernia repair is safe and effective and may result in less postoperative pain and faster recuperation compared with traditional open hernia repairs. Controversy exists as to the increased cost associated with laparoscopic repairs. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the cost of the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic repair and the tension-free Lichtenstein repair at teaching hospitals. The records of consecutive TEP (n = 28) and Lichtenstein (n = 28) repairs performed at Parkland Memorial Hospital and Zale-Lipshy University Hospital were reviewed. A detailed cost analysis was performed. Total patient charge (5,509 US dollars vs. 3,999 US dollars) and total cost (2,861 US dollars vs. 2,009 US dollars) were higher for TEP versus Lichtenstein repairs, respectively (P < 0.05). Operative time and complications were similar for both groups. Return to full activity (15 vs. 34 days) was faster for TEP versus Lichtenstein repairs, respectively (P < 0.05). Of 9 patients in the TEP group who had previously undergone an open hernia repair, 8 (89%) preferred the laparoscopic approach. The laparoscopic TEP repair costs 852 US dollars more than the Lichtenstein repair. The TEP repair results in faster recuperation. Patient preference and faster recuperation may offset the increased cost associated with laparoscopic hernia repair.