RESUMO
PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage is a major surgical complication following esophagectomy and gastric pull-up. Specific risk factors such as celiac trunk (TC) stenosis and high calcification score of the aorta have been identified, but no data are available on their relative prognostic values. This retrospective study aimed to compare and evaluate calcification score versus stenosis quantification with regards to prognostic impact on anastomotic leakage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans of 164 consecutive patients with primary esophageal cancer were evaluated by two radiologists to apply a calcification score (0-3 scale) assessing the aorta, the celiac axis and the right and left postceliac arteries. Concurrently, the presence and degree of stenosis of TC and superior mesenteric artery were recorded for stenosis quantification. RESULTS: Anastomotic leakage was noted in 14/164 patients and 12/14 showed stenosis of TC (n=11). The presence of TC stenosis was found to have a significant impact on anastomotic healing (p=0.004). The odds ratio for the prediction of anastomotic leakage by the degree of stenosis was 1.04 (95% CI, 1.02-1.07). Ten of 14 patients had aortic calcification scores of 1 or 2, but calcification scores of the aorta, the celiac axis and the right and left postceliac arteries did not correlate with the corresponding TC stenosis values and showed no influence on patient outcome as defined by the occurrence of anastomotic insufficiency (p=0.565, 0.855, 0.518 and 1.000, respectively). Inter-reader reliability of computed tomography analysis and absolute agreement on calcium scoring was mostly over 90%. No significant differences in preoperative comorbidities and patient characteristics were found between those with and without anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSION: Measurement of TC stenosis in preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans proved to be more reliable than calcification scores in predicting anastomotic leakage and should, therefore, be used in the risk assessment of patients undergoing esophagectomy and gastric pull-up.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Chylothorax is a major complication after esophagectomy. As recent studies refer to heterogeneous patient cohorts and surgical procedures, this study was conducted to report the incidence and evaluate the optimal management of chylous fistula in patients treated with transthoracic esophagectomy and 2-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. METHODS: From January 2005 to December 2013, a total of 906 patients underwent transthoracic esophageal resection for esophageal carcinoma at our institution. En bloc esophagectomy was performed with routine supradiaphragmatic ligation of the thoracic duct. The incidence of chylothorax, and associated morbidity and mortality, were analyzed, and subsequent therapeutic management was reviewed. RESULTS: Chylothorax after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy was observed in 17 (1.9%) patients. Fifteen patients required surgical intervention with rethoracotomy and repeat duct ligation. Thoracic duct ligation was successful in all patients. Two patients died within 90 days after primary esophageal resection. The median time between initial tumor resection and rethoracotomy was 13 days. Average daily chest-tube output at time of reoperation was 1900 mL. In 2 patients, pleural effusion did not exceed 1000 mL per day. In these cases, conservative management with additional thoracic drainage and total parenteral nutrition led to complete resolution of chylous fistula. CONCLUSIONS: Occurrence of chylothorax after prophylactic thoracic duct ligation during transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is rare. In patients with high-output chylous fistula, an early rethoracotomy with repeat ligation of the thoracic duct is safe and helps to shorten recovery time. In cases of low-volume drainage, a conservative approach is feasible.
