A comparison of resource costs of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction.

The resource cost (cost to our hospital) of providing mastectomy plus breast reconstruction was calculated for 276 patients who had received both mastectomy and breast reconstruction at our institution. All patients had completed the entire reconstructive process, including reconstruction of the nipple. The resource costs of providing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction were compared with those of mastectomy with subsequent delayed reconstruction. We found that the mean resource cost for the 57 patients who had separate mastectomy followed by delayed breast reconstruction ($28,843) was 62 percent higher than that of mastectomy with immediate reconstruction ($17,801; n = 219, p < 0.001). Similar differences were found when patients were subgrouped by type of reconstruction (TRAM versus tissue expansion and implants), by laterality (unilateral versus bilateral), and by history of preoperative irradiation. We conclude that mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction is significantly less expensive than mastectomy followed by delayed reconstruction and can potentially conserve resources.

A comparison of resource costs for head and neck reconstruction with free and pectoralis major flaps.

A series of 178 immediate reconstructions with regional or distant tissue for repair of oropharyngeal defects caused by treatment of head and neck cancer was reviewed to determine whether reconstruction with free flaps was more or less expensive than reconstruction with regional myocutaneous flaps. In this series, three types of flaps were used: the radial forearm free flap (n = 89), the rectus abdominis free flap (n = 56), and the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (n = 33). Resource costs were determined by adding all costs to the institution of providing each service studied using salaried employees (including physicians). The two free-flap groups were combined to compare free flaps with the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, a regional myocutaneous flap. Failure rates in the two groups were similar (3.0 percent for pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, 3.4 percent for free flaps). The mean costs of surgery were slightly higher for the free flaps, but the subsequent hospital stay costs were lower. Therefore, the total mean resource cost for the free-flap group ($28,460) was lower than the cost for the myocutaneous flap group ($40,992). The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap may have been selected for more patients with advanced disease and systemic medical problems, contributing to longer hospitalization and added cost. Nevertheless, this study suggests that free flaps are not more expensive than other methods and may provide cost savings for selected patients.

Comparison of resource costs of free and conventional TRAM flap breast reconstruction.

Resource costs, which are the costs to the hospital of providing a service, were measured for 154 patients who underwent mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with TRAM flaps. Unilateral and bilateral reconstructions were evaluated separately. The resource costs required to perform mastectomy and reconstruction with free TRAM flaps were then compared with those required when conventional TRAM flaps were used. The mean total resource cost in the free TRAM group was slightly higher than in the conventional TRAM group, but the difference was small (4.1 percent) and not statistically significant (p = 0.290). The mean resource cost of performing bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction was higher than that of unilateral mastectomy and reconstruction, but the difference was only 5.0 percent (p = 0.046). This study shows that the cost to an institution of providing breast reconstruction with free TRAM flaps is not significantly higher than that of performing reconstruction with conventional TRAM flaps. Also, our findings show that the resource costs of performing bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction are not much higher than those of treating only one breast.

Comparison of resource costs between implant-based and TRAM flap breast reconstruction.

Resource costs, as measured by hours of time in the operating room, days of stay in the hospital, and other costs of care, were evaluated for 240 patients who underwent mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction using either TRAM flaps or breast implants at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. To make costs comparable, only patients who completed reconstruction of the nipple were included. As expected, the initial resource costs of implant-based reconstruction were much lower than those of TRAM flap reconstruction. After correcting for patients whose reconstructions were unsuccessful and including the costs of surgery subsequent to the initial reconstruction, however, the cost advantage of implant-based reconstruction disappeared. If current trends continue, it is likely that with increased follow-up, the long-term resource costs of implant-based reconstructions will continue to increase, while those of autogenous tissue reconstructions will not. Autogenous breast reconstruction with the TRAM flap therefore appears to be more cost-effective, in terms of time as well as dollars, in the long run than reconstruction based on prosthetic implants.

Costs and complications in mandibular reconstruction.

Because of increasing concerns about the high cost of complex medical care, we compared the combined cost of ablation and reconstruction incurred using five different management strategies for patients undergoing mandibular resection. We also compared the rates of complication and failure for the methods used. The records of 69 patients undergoing segmental or total mandibulectomy between January 1, 1986, and June 30, 1990, were reviewed. Of these, 15 had reconstruction with soft tissue only (average cost, $36,137; complication rate, 33%), whereas 20 had immediate reconstruction with vascularized bone (average cost, $46,894; complication rate, 50%), and 15 had reconstruction with only a metal plate (average cost, $47,678; complication rate, 73%). Nine patients had plate reconstructions initially but subsequently underwent reconstructions with bone (average cost, $54,346; complication rate, 78%), whereas 10 patients had no initial reconstruction but subsequently underwent delayed reconstruction with bone (average cost, $52,486; complication rate, 70%). If reconstruction was performed with bone, immediate reconstruction was more cost effective than delayed reconstruction and had a lower complication rate as well.