Accuracy of radiological tumour size assessment and the risk for re-excision in a cohort of primary breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Re-operations after breast conserving surgery (BCS) are necessary, when specimen margins are not free of breast cancer cells. This study explored the accuracy of preoperative tumour size assessment and its influence on the rate of re-excisions and mastectomies. METHODS: The study included 1591 patients with invasive breast cancer, who were planned for BCS. Patient, staging and tumor characteristics were evaluated concerning their influence on re-excision and mastectomy rates. Patient and tumor characteristics comprised histopathological tumour size, HER2 status, multifocality, in situ component, grading (G), nodal status and hormone receptor (HR) status. Staging characteristics included deviation from pathological tumour size as measured by clinical examination, sonography and mammography. RESULTS: In 1316 patients (83%) sufficient treatment was possible with one operation. 275 patients (17%) had to undergo at least one further surgery as a result of positive specimen margins. In 138 patients (9%) mastectomy was ultimately necessary. In patients with a positive HER2 status, a larger tumour size, underestimation by ultrasound, an in situ component and multifocality, the risk for a re-operation was about doubled. Tumour size deviation in the mammogram or the clinical tumour size assessment did not have significant influence to the re-excision rates. CONCLUSION: Tumour size and accurate presurgical assessment of the tumour size itself are independent predictors for the need of a second surgery or even a mastectomy in patients for whom a primary BCS was planned.

New diagnostic criteria in real-time elastography for the assessment of breast lesions.

PURPOSE: Elastography is a new ultrasonographic method that has been examined as a diagnostic tool for breast lesions. This study was intended to create and define new elastographic criteria allowing assessment of whether breast lesions are malignant or benign. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 217 patients with a total of 245 breast lesions of unknown malignancy underwent ultrasound examination. The new eSie Touch Elasticity Imaging technology (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) was used with a 10-MHz linear transducer (Acuson Antares). Lesions were examined using B-mode and real-time elastography (RTE). Each lesion was histologically assessed by core biopsy. Five RTE characteristics were examined: elasticity proportion (EP), different location on RTE in comparison with B-mode (MV), different contrast patterns (SOS), dorsal lesion limitation visibility and different size on RTE in comparison with B-mode. RESULTS: 54 malignant lesions (54 %) appeared inelastic, in contrast to the benign control group (34.5 %; P = 0.001). A completely elastic pattern was visible in 10 malignant (10 %) and 39 benign lesions (26.9 %). MV was identified in 23 cases, with 22 of the lesions being malignant and one benign. The SOS was negative in 89 malignant lesions (89 %) and positive in 100 benign lesions. The dorsal lesion limitation was visible on RTE without B-mode in 88 malignant lesions (88 %) and 27 benign lesions (18.6 %). The size was assessed as larger in 45 malignant lesions (45 %) and seven benign lesions (4.8 %). CONCLUSION: SOS and a larger tumor size on RTE are specific characteristics of malignant breast lesions. EP, MV and distal mass border are further helpful signs to assess the malignancy of tumors.