Assessment of late-term progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in patients with orthotopic heart transplantation using quantitative cardiac 82Rb PET.

The risk stratification and long-term survival of patients with orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) is impacted by the complication of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). This study evaluates changes in myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial coronary flow reserve (CFR) in a group of long-term OHT patients using quantitative cardiac 82Rb-positron emission tomography (PET). Twenty patients (7 females and 13 males, mean age = 72.7 ± 12.2 years with CAV and 62.9 ± 7.2 years without CAV and post-OHT mean time = 13.9 years), were evaluated retrospectively using dynamic cardiac 82Rb-PET at rest and regadenoson-induced stress. The patients also underwent selective coronary angiography (SCA) for diagnosis and risk stratification. CAV was diagnosed based on SCA findings and maximal intimal thickness greater than 0.5 mm, as defined by International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Global and regional MBFs were estimated in three vascular territories using the standard 1-tissue compartment model for dynamic 82Rb-PET. The myocardial CFR was also calculated as the ratio of peak stress MBF to rest MBF. Among twenty patients, seven had CAV in, at least, one major coronary artery (ISHLT CAV grade 1 or higher) while 13 patients did not have CAV (NonCAV). Mean rate-pressure products (RPP) at rest were significantly elevated in CAV patients compared to those without CAV (P = 0.002) but it was insignificant at stress (P = NS). There was no significant difference in the stress MBFs between CAV and NonCAV patients (P = NS). However, the difference in RPP-normalized stress MBFs was significant (P = 0.045), while RPP-normalized MBFs at rest was not significant (P = NS). Both CFR and RPP-normalized CFR were significantly lower in CAV compared to NonCAV patients (P < 0.001). There were significant correlations between MBFs and RPPs at rest for both CAV (ρ = 0.764, P = 0.047) and NonCAV patients (ρ = 0.641, P = 0.017), while there were no correlations at stress for CAV (ρ = 0.232, P = NS) and NonCAV patients (ρ = 0.068, P = NS). This study indicates that the resting MBF is higher in late-term post-OHT patients. The high resting MBF and reduced CFR suggest an unprecedented demand of blood flow and blunted response to stress due to impaired vasodilatory capacity that is exacerbated by the presence of CAV.

Relation of thoracic aortic and aortic valve calcium to coronary artery calcium and risk assessment.

Aortic calcium, aortic valve calcium (AVC), and coronary artery calcium (CAC) have been associated with cardiovascular event risk. We examined the prevalence of thoracic aortic calcium (TAC) and AVC in relation to the presence and extent of CAC, cardiovascular risk factors, and estimated risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). In 2,740 persons without known CHD aged 20 to 79 years, CAC was assessed by electron beam- or multidetector-computed tomography. We determined the prevalence of TAC and AVC in relation to CAC, CHD risk factors, and predicted 10-year risk of CHD. A close correspondence of TAC and AVC was observed with CAC. TAC and AVC increased with age; by the eighth decade of life, the prevalence of TAC was similar to that of CAC (>80%), and 36% of men and 24% of women had AVC. Age, male gender, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were directly related to the likelihood of CAC, TAC, and AVC; higher diastolic blood pressure and cigarette smoking additionally predicted CAC. Body mass index and higher systolic and lower diastolic blood pressures were also related to TAC, and higher body mass index and lower diastolic blood pressure were related to AVC. Calculated risk of CHD increased with the presence of AVC and TAC across levels of CAC. TAC and AVC provided incremental value over CAC in association with the 10-year calculated risk of CHD. If longitudinal studies show an incremental value of aortic and aortic valve calcium over that of CAC for prediction of cardiovascular events, future guidelines for risk assessment incorporating CAC assessment may additionally incorporate the measurement of aortic and/or aortic valve calcium.