Is the cost of the new home dialysis techniques still advantageous compared to in-center hemodialysis? An Italian single center analysis and comparison with experiences from western countries.

Introduction: Potential advantages of home dialysis remained a questionable issue. Three main factors have to be considered: the progressive reduction in the cost of consumables for in-Center hemodialysis (IC-HD), the widespread use of incremental Peritoneal Dialysis (PD), and the renewed interest in home hemodialysis (H-HD) in the pandemic era. Registries data on prevalence of dialysis modalities generally report widespread underemployment of home dialysis despite PD and H-HD could potentially provide clinical benefits, improve quality of life, and contrast the diffusion of new infection among immunocompromised patients. Methods: We examined the economic impact of home dialysis by comparing the direct and indirect costs of PD (53 patients), H-HD (21 patients) and IC-HD (180 patients) in a single hospital of North-west Italy. In order to achieve comparable weekly costs, the average weekly frequency of dialysis sessions based on the dialysis modality was calculated, the cost of individual sessions per patient per week normalized, and the monthly and yearly costs were derived. Results: As expected, PD resulted the least expensive procedure (€ 23,314.79 per patient per year), but, notably, H-HD has a lower average cost than IC-HD (€ 35,535.00 vs. € 40,798.98). A cost analysis of the different dialysis procedures confirms the lower cost of PD, especially continuous ambulatory PD, compared to any extracorporeal technique. Discussion: Among the hemodialysis techniques, home bicarbonate HD showed the lowest costs, while the weekly cost of Frequent Home Hemodialysis was found to be comparable to In-Center Bicarbonate Hemodialysis.

Unmet needs in countries participating in the undiagnosed diseases network international: an international survey considering national health care and economic indicators.

Background: Patients, families, the healthcare system, and society as a whole are all significantly impacted by rare diseases (RDs). According to various classifications, there are currently up to 9,000 different rare diseases that have been recognized, and new diseases are discovered every month. Although very few people are affected by each uncommon disease individually, millions of people are thought to be impacted globally when all these conditions are considered. Therefore, RDs represent an important public health concern. Although crucial for clinical care, early and correct diagnosis is still difficult to achieve in many nations, especially those with low and middle incomes. Consequently, a sizeable amount of the overall burden of RD is attributable to undiagnosed RD (URD). Existing barriers and policy aspects impacting the care of patients with RD and URD remain to be investigated. Methods: To identify unmet needs and opportunities for patients with URD, the Developing Nations Working Group of the Undiagnosed Diseases Network International (DNWG-UDNI) conducted a survey among its members, who were from 20 different nations. The survey used a mix of multiple choice and dedicated open questions covering a variety of topics. To explore reported needs and analyze them in relation to national healthcare economical aspects, publicly available data on (a) World Bank ranking; (b) Current health expenditure per capita; (c) GDP per capita; (d) Domestic general government health expenditure (% of GDP); and (e) Life expectancy at birth, total (years) were incorporated in our study. Results: This study provides an in-depth evaluation of the unmet needs for 20 countries: low-income (3), middle-income (10), and high-income (7). When analyzing reported unmet needs, almost all countries (N = 19) indicated that major barriers still exist when attempting to improve the care of patients with UR and/or URD; most countries report unmet needs related to the availability of specialized care and dedicated facilities. However, while the countries ranked as low income by the World Bank showed the highest prevalence of referred unmet needs across the different domains, no specific trend appeared when comparing the high, upper, and low-middle income nations. No overt trend was observed when separating countries by current health expenditure per capita, GDP per capita, domestic general government health expenditure (% of GDP) and life expectancy at birth, total (years). Conversely, both the GDP and domestic general government health expenditure for each country impacted the presence of ongoing research. Conclusion: We found that policy characteristics varied greatly with the type of health system and country. No overall pattern in terms of referral for unmet needs when separating countries by main economic or health indicators were observed. Our findings highlight the importance of identifying actionable points (e.g., implemented orphan drug acts or registries where not available) in order to improve the care and diagnosis of RDs and URDs on a global scale.

Health inequalities and social determinants of health: The role of syndemics in rheumatic diseases.

A syndemic is the co-existence of two or more health problems (including both social and biological features) that adversely influence each other with negative consequences on disease outcomes and perpetuation of inequalities. The syndemic approach can be applied to better understand the course of rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) involving the study of adverse biological pathways and social determinants of health (SDH) all under the same framework. Identifying if a syndemic exists within RMDs may include investigating the synergic interactions between comorbidity (e.g., diabetes, obesity, chronic kidney diseases) and the concomitant of other adverse conditions (e.g., drug non-adherence, substance abuse), along with SDHs such as low household income, unemployment, low education, limited access to health care, as well as racial/ethnic discrimination. For decades, the understanding of RMDs progression has been based on causality, rather than investigating the kaleidoscopic web of connections that can potentially influence a disease course. The co-existence of health burdens in vulnerable populations, including those with RMD, specifically in certain socioeconomic groups, calls for new ways and strategies of thinking to improve our understanding of risk factors and co-morbidities to offer tailored interventions for clinical medicine and public health policy.

Extra-criteria manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome: Risk assessment and management.

OBJECTIVES: Extra-criteria manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) might impact on prognosis and morbidity of the disease. In this study, we aimed to evaluate a population of patients with primary APS (PAPS) whether the extra-criteria manifestations were more frequently found in subjects with higher adjusted Global APS Score (aGAPSS) values when compared to patients with thrombotic and/or obstetric APS ("criteria" manifestations) only. METHODS: Clinical records were analyzed to retrieve extra-criteria manifestation of APS, cardiovascular risk factors and antiphospholipid antibodies profile. The aGAPSS was calculated by adding the points, as follows: 3 for hyperlipidaemia, 1 for arterial hypertension, 5 for anticardiolipin antibodies IgG/IgM, 4 for anti-ß2 glycoprotein I IgG/IgM, and 4 for lupus anticoagulant. RESULTS: This retrospective multicenter study included 89 consecutive PAPS [mean age 43.1 (S.D. ± 12.9), female 67%, 52% arterial and 65% venous]. Twenty-seven patients (30.3%) had a history of livedo, 19 (21.3%) had a history of confirmed thrombocytopenia, 3 (3.4%) had biopsy-proven antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL)-related nephropathy and 3 (3.4%) had a history of valvulopathy. Patients with extra-criteria manifestations presented a mean aGAPSS significantly higher [mean 10.30 (S.D. ± 3.57, range: 4-17) vs mean 8.16 (S.D. ± 3.52;range: 4-16, p = 0.005). When comparing patients with and without extra-criteria manifestations, the first group had significantly higher incidence of anti-ß2GPI antibodies positivity (59% and 33%, respectively, p = 0.015), double aPL positivities (53% and 31%, respectively, p = 0.034), cerebrovascular events history (52% and 24%, respectively, p = 0.007) and arterial hypertension (52% and 24%, respectively, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that patients with higher aGAPSS, might be at higher risk for developing extra-criteria manifestations of APS and should therefore undergo a thorough laboratory and instrumental evaluation.

Prevalence and Thrombotic Risk Assessment of Anti-ß2 Glycoprotein I Domain I Antibodies: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: To date, the exact prevalence of anti-ß2 glycoprotein I domain I (anti-ß2GPI-DI) antibodies in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and their role when assessing thrombosis risk is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of anti-ß2GPI-DI in patients with APS and to determine whether anti-ß2GPI-DI-positive individuals are at greater risk of thrombosis, as compared with individuals without anti-ß2GPI-DI, by systematically reviewing the literature. METHODS: A detailed literature search was applied a priori to Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citation 1986 to present and to abstracts from the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/Association for Rheumatology Health Professionals (ARHP ) Annual Meetings (2011-2015). RESULTS: A total of 11 studies, including 1,585 patients, were analyzed. Patients were distributed as follow: 1,218 patients APS (45.4% anti-ß2GPI-DI-positive; in more detail: 504 primary APS [55.4% anti-ß2GPI-DI-positive], 192 secondary APS [43.2% anti-ß2GPI-DI-positive], and 522 not specified), 318 with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE; 26.7% anti-ß2GPI-DI-positive), 49 asymptomatic carriers of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) (30.6% anti-ß2GPI-DI-positive), and 1,859 healthy controls. When considering the five studies eligible for thrombotic risk assessment, four studies found a significant association of anti-ß2GPI-DI-positivity with thrombotic events, whereas one study found no predictive correlation with thrombosis (overall odds ratio [OR] for pooled data: 1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52-2.6; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We report an overall estimated median prevalence of anti-ß2GPI-DI antibodies of 44.3% in patients with APS and/or SLE and a significantly higher prevalence among patients with APS compared with SLE alone. Anti-ß2GPI-DI antibodies might represent a promising tool when assessing thrombotic risk in patients with APS.

Thrombotic risk assessment in antiphospholipid syndrome: the role of new antibody specificities and thrombin generation assay.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune condition characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in subjects presenting with thrombosis and/or pregnancy loss. The currently used classification criteria were updated in the international consensus held in Sidney in 2005. Vascular events seem to result of local procoagulative alterations upon triggers influence (the so called "second-hit theory"), while placental thrombosis and complement activation seem to lead to pregnancy morbidity. The laboratory tests suggested by the current classification criteria include lupus anticoagulant, a functional coagulation assay, and anticardiolipin and anti-ß2-glycoprotein-I antibodies, generally detected by solid phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The real challenge for treating physicians is understanding what is the actual weight of aPL in provoking clinical manifestations in each case. As thrombosis has a multi-factorial cause, each patient needs a risk-stratified approach. In this review we discuss the role of thrombotic risk assessment in primary and secondary prevention of venous and arterial thromboembolic disease in patients with APS, focusing on new antibody specificities, available risk scoring models and new coagulation assays.

A 4-year observation in lupus nephritis patients treated with an intensified B-lymphocyte depletion without immunosuppressive maintenance treatment-Clinical response compared to literature and immunological re-assessment.

BACKGROUND: B cells (BC) play a critical role in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). BC depletion therapy still remains an attractive option, despite the disappointing results of randomized controlled trials (RTCs). METHODS: Twelve patients with SLE [3 males, mean age 43.8 yrs (25-55)] with severe multiorgan involvement all including kidney (3 patients with Class IV, 4 with Class III/V and 5 with Class V, according to the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society glomerulonephritis classification), skin lesions [10], severe polyarthralgias with arthritis [10], polyserositis [2], and lymphadenopathy [5] have been prospectively treated with an intensified B cell depletion therapy (IBCDT) protocol due to their resistance or intolerance to previous therapy (six cases) or as a front line immunosuppressive treatment in 6 women with unsatisfactory therapeutic compliance or as a specific request of a short-time immunosuppression for gestational perspectives. PROTOCOL: Rituximab (RTX) 375 mg/sm on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 2 more doses after 1 and 2 months, associated with 2 IV administrations of 10mg/kg of cyclophosphamide and 3 methylprednisolone pulses (15mg/kg) followed by oral prednisone (0.8 mg/kg/day, rapidly tapered to 5mg/day by the end of the 3rd month after RTX). No further immunosuppressive maintenance therapy has been given. RESULTS: Patients had been followed-up for a mean of 44.5 (24-93)months. Significant decreases (p<0.05) were found in the levels of ESR (baseline mean value: 55.0mm; 3 months: 36; end of follow-up: 13), anti-dsDNA antibodies (baseline: 185 U; 3 months: 107; end of follow-up: 15), and proteinuria (baseline: 4.9 g/24h; 3 months: 0.97; end of follow-up: 0.22). C4 values (baseline 11 mg/dl) significantly increased (p<0.05) after 3 months (22 mg/dl) and at the end of the follow-up (20mg/dl). Of the 12 patients, 9 (75%) have remained well after one cycle of IBCDT, with no flare (mean 51.6 months [25-93]). Three patients relapsed after 36, 41, and 72 months, respectively. Following re-treatment, they again showed complete remission over 18-48 months of observation. CONCLUSIONS: A promising role of RTX in an intensified protocol of induction therapy can be envisaged in patients for whom avoiding immunosuppressive maintenance therapy and sparing steroids are particularly appealing. Moreover, our data confirm in one of the longest follow-up available, the opportunity to reconsider the regimens of BL depletion in the treatment of the most severe or refractory forms of SLE despite the disappointing results of RCTs.

Thrombotic risk assessment in systemic lupus erythematosus: validation of the global antiphospholipid syndrome score in a prospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to prospectively and independently validate the Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome Score (GAPSS), a system derived from the combination of independent risk factors for thrombosis, including antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and conventional cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: The GAPSS was applied to 51 consecutive systemic lupus erythematosus patients, all positive for aPL and prospectively followed up for mean ± SD 32.94 ± 12.06 months. Of them, 48 were women with a mean ± SD age of 37.35 ± 12.15 years at entry. The GAPSS was calculated yearly for each patient by adding together the points corresponding to the risk factors. RESULTS: An increase in the GAPSS (entry versus last visit) was seen in patients who experienced vascular events (n = 4, mean ± SD 7.5 ± 4.36 versus 10.0 ± 5.4; P = 0.032). No changes were observed in those without thrombosis (n = 47, mean ± SD 8.28 ± 4.88 versus 7.13 ± 5.75; P = 0.24). An increase in the GAPSS during the followup was associated with a higher risk of vascular events (relative risk 12.30 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.43-106.13], P = 0.004), and an increase of more than 3 points showed the best risk accuracy for vascular events (hazard ratio 48 [95% CI 6.90-333.85], P = 0.0001). The cumulative proportion of thrombosis-free individuals was lower in patients whose GAPSS was increased by 3 or more points (P = 0.0027). CONCLUSION: We have prospectively demonstrated that GAPSS is a valid tool for accurate prediction of vascular events in SLE patients with aPL.

Is it time for biosimilars in autoimmune diseases?

The last two decades have witnessed a revolution in the treatment of autoimmune diseases due to the introduction of biological agents which, although now included as standard treatment in patients with autoimmune rheumatological, dermatological and gastrointestinal diseases. The use of biological agents is associated with greater costs compared with the mainly anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressant drugs used in the pre-biological era. Biosimilars are highly similar copies of biological drugs, but not identical to approved 'reference' agents. Biological agents are complex proteins involved in the immune response and their exact replicas are extremely difficult, if not impossible, to obtain. Three scenarios have converged to provide a specific opportunity for biosimilars in autoimmune diseases: growing demand for biologics due to successful clinical use; the nearing of patent expiry for the four top-selling biological brands; and the search to reduce health costs due to the financial crisis. We aimed to review the crucial topics of efficacy, safety and regulatory approach of upcoming biosimilars.