Perfil clínico e avaliação de risco prognóstico dos pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca aguda com função sistólica preservada versus disfunção sistólica / Clinical profile and prognostic risk assessment of patients with acute heart failure with preserved systolic function versus systolic dysfunction

Objetivo: Comparar o perfil clínico e escala ADHERE na insuficiência cardíaca aguda (ICA) com (ICAD) e sem função sistólica (ICAS) preservada. Métodos: Avaliação retrospectiva da ICA na emergência, entre 04/2004 e 05/2005. 86 portadores de ICA submeteram-se a exames clínicos laboratoriais(BNP, sódio, hemoglobina, uréia e creatinina), classificação de ADHERE, e ecocardiograma com fração de ejeção (FE) maior que 40 por cento na ICAD e menor que 40 por cento na ICAS. Foram empregados os testes de Mann-Whitney e qui-quadrado. Resultados: 51 tinham ICAD e 35 ICAS, sem diferença quanto: sexo (p igual a 0,14), causa da IC (p igual a 0,48), diabetes (p igual a 0,36), DPOC (0,97), insuficiência renal (0,21) e infarto do miocárdio prévio (p igual a 0,92). Os pacientes com ICAD eram mais idosos (80 x 72 anos, p igual a 0,01), sem história (52 por cento x 20,5 por cento, p igual a 0,03) ou internações prévias por IC (37 por cento x 63 por cento, p igual a 0,018), tinham mais HAS (92 por cento vs 72 por cento, p igual a 0,01) e PAS admissional maior (150mmHg x 130mmHg, p igual a 0,0007)...

Dor torácica na sala de emergência: a importância de uma abordagem sistematizada / Chest pain in the emergency room: importance of a systematic approach

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency of a systematic diagnostic approach in patients with chest pain in the emergency room in relation to the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the rate of hospitalization in high-cost units. METHODS: One thousand and three consecutive patients with chest pain were screened according to a pre-established process of diagnostic investigation based on the pre-test probability of ACS determinate by chest pain type and ECG changes. RESULTS: Of the 1003 patients, 224 were immediately discharged home because of no suspicion of ACS (route 5) and 119 were immediately transferred to the coronary care united because of ST elevation or left bundle-branch block (LBBB) (route 1) (74 per cent of these had a final diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction [AMI]). Of the 660 patients that remained in the emergency room under observation, 77 (12 per cent) had AMI without ST segment elevation and 202 (31 per cent) had unstable angina (UA). In route 2 (high probability of ACS) 17 per cent of patients had AMI and 43 per cent had UA, whereas in route 3 (low probability) 2 per cent had AMI and 7 per cent had UA. The admission ECG has been confirmed as a poor sensitivity test for the diagnosis of AMI ( 49 per cent), with a positive predictive value considered only satisfactory (79 per cent). CONCLUSION : A systematic diagnostic strategy, as used in this study, is essential in managing patients with chest pain in the emergency room in order to obtain high diagnostic accuracy, lower cost, and optimization of the use of coronary care unit beds.