Beyond SEP-1 Compliance: Assessing the Impact of Antibiotic Overtreatment and Fluid Overload in Suspected Septic Patients.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) developed the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Performance Measure bundle (SEP-1) metric to improve sepsis care, but evidence supporting this bundle is limited and harms secondary to compliance have not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the effect of an emergency department (ED) sepsis quality-improvement (QI) effort to improve CMS SEP-1 compliance, looking specifically at antibiotic overtreatment and harm from fluid resuscitation. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study conducted between March and July 2021 with patients for whom a sepsis order set was initiated. The primary outcomes included the number of patients treated with antibiotics who were ultimately deemed nonseptic and the number of patients who developed pulmonary edema, with or without need for positive pressure ventilation (PPV), within 48 h of receiving a 30 mL/kg fluid bolus. Data were collected via nonblinded chart reviews, with a free marginal κ-calculation indicating excellent interrater reliability. RESULTS: The study cohort included 273 patients, 170 (62.3%) who were ultimately determined to be septic and 103 (37.7%) who were nonseptic. Of the 103 nonseptic patients, 82 (79.6%) received antibiotics in the ED. Of the 121 patients (44.3%) who received a 30 mL/kg bolus, 5 patients (4.1%) developed pulmonary edema and 0 of 121 patients required PPV within 48 h. CONCLUSIONS: The QI effort led to moderate rates of antibiotic overtreatment and very few patients developed pulmonary edema due to a 30 mL/kg fluid bolus.

Stage-of-change Assessment Predicts Short-term Treatment Engagement for Opioid Use Disorder Patients Initiated on Buprenorphine.

INTRODUCTION: The emergency department (ED) is an effective setting for initiating medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD); however, predicting who will remain in treatment remains a central challenge. We hypothesize that baseline stage-of-change (SOC) assessment is associated with short-term treatment retention outcomes. METHODS: This is a longitudinal cohort study of all patients enrolled in an ED MOUD program over 12 months. Eligible and willing patients were treated with buprenorphine at baseline and had addiction medicine specialist follow-up arranged. Treatment retention at 30 and 90 days was determined by review of the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program. We used uni- and multivariate logistic regression to evaluate associations between patient variables and treatment retention at 30 and 90 days. RESULTS: From June 2018-May 2019, 279 patients were enrolled in the ED MOUD program. Of those patients 151 (54.1%) and 120 (43.0%) remained engaged in MOUD treatment at 30 and 90 days, respectively. The odds of treatment adherence at 30 days were significantly higher for those with advanced SOC (preparation/action/maintenance) compared to those presenting with limited SOC (pre-contemplation/contemplation) (60.0% vs 40.8%; odds ratio 2.18; 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 4.1; P <0.05). At 30 days, multivariate logistic regression determined that advanced SOC, age >40, having medical insurance, and being employed were significant predictors of continued treatment adherence. At 90 days, advanced SOC, non-White race, age > 40, and having insurance were all significantly associated with higher likelihood of treatment engagement. CONCLUSION: Greater stage-of-change was significantly associated with MOUD treatment retention at 30 and 90 days post index ED visit.

Patient Navigation for Patients Frequently Visiting the Emergency Department: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) superutilizers (patients with five or more visits/year) comprise only 5% of the patients seen yet comprise 25% of total ED visits. Although the reasons for this are multifactorial, the cost to the patient and the community is exceedingly high. The cost is not just monetary; care of these patients is inappropriately fragmented and their presence in the ED may contribute to overcrowding affecting the community's emergency readiness. Previous studies using staff trained to help patients navigate their care options have had conflicting results. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine whether a trained patient navigator (PN) can reduce ED use and costs in superutilizers over a 1-year period. METHODS: Superutilizers were enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients were randomized into the treatment arm and met with a PN who reviewed their diagnosis and associated care plan and identified proper primary care services and community resources for follow-up. The remaining control group was provided standard care. Both groups were given a follow-up call and survey by the PN within 7 days of their visit who assessed primary care follow-up and patient satisfaction using a 4-point Likert scale. After 12 months, the patients' return ED visits and ED costs were compared to the year prior and primary care compliance and satisfaction were measured using Student's t-tests with Bonferroni correction or Mann-Whitney U-tests. RESULTS: A total of 282 patients were enrolled (148 in navigation treatment group, 134 controls). Patients were similarly matched in age, race, sex, insurance, and chief complaints. Overall ED visits decreased during the 12-month study period, compared to the 12 months prior to enrollment (2,249 visits prior to 2,050 visits during study period, -8.8%). There was a greater decrease in ED visits from the preenrollment year to postenrollment year in the treatment group (1,148 visits to 996 visits, -13.2%) compared to the control group (1,101 visits to 1,054 visits, -4.3%; p < 0.05). Overall health care costs (ED and hospital) for all 282 patients decreased in the year after compared to the 12 months prior to enrollment ($3.9M to $3.1M) with a greater decrease in the navigation treatment group (-26.6%) compared to the control group (-17.5%). Patient surveys found no difference in patient satisfaction in the pre- and postenrollment periods but there was an increase in primary care physician (PCP) use over the 12-month follow-up period in the treatment group (6.42 visits/patient) compared to the control group (4.07 visits/patient; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our data showed that the overall number of return ED visits and costs did decrease for both groups, potentially inferring a placebo effect for the use of a PN; however, the decrease in ED visits and costs were greater in the treatment group. One-year follow-up noted an increase in PCP visits in the navigation group. Use of a PN may be cost-effective.