Assessment of Acute Kidney Injury using MRI.

There has been growing interest in using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to describe and understand the pathophysiology of acute kidney injury (AKI). The ability to assess kidney blood flow, perfusion, oxygenation, and changes in tissue microstructure at repeated timepoints is hugely appealing, as this offers new possibilities to describe nature and severity of AKI, track the time-course to recovery or progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD), and may ultimately provide a method to noninvasively assess response to new therapies. This could have significant clinical implications considering that AKI is common (affecting more than 13 million people globally every year), harmful (associated with short and long-term morbidity and mortality), and currently lacks specific treatments. However, this is also a challenging area to study. After the kidney has been affected by an initial insult that leads to AKI, complex coexisting processes ensue, which may recover or can progress to CKD. There are various preclinical models of AKI (from which most of our current understanding derives), and these differ from each other but more importantly from clinical AKI. These aspects are fundamental to interpreting the results of the different AKI studies in which renal MRI has been used, which encompass different settings of AKI and a variety of MRI measures acquired at different timepoints. This review aims to provide a comprehensive description and interpretation of current studies (both preclinical and clinical) in which MRI has been used to assess AKI, and discuss future directions in the field. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Evaluate Kidney Structure, Function, and Pathology: Moving Toward Clinical Application.

Recent advances in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allow multiple quantitative measures to assess kidney morphology, tissue microstructure, oxygenation, kidney blood flow, and perfusion to be collected in a single scan session. Animal and clinical studies have investigated the relationship between the different MRI measures and biological processes, although their interpretation can be complex due to variations in study design and generally small participant numbers. However, emerging themes include the apparent diffusion coefficient derived from diffusion-weighted imaging, T1 and T2 mapping parameters, and cortical perfusion being consistently associated with kidney damage and predicting kidney function decline. Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) MRI has shown inconsistent associations with kidney damage markers but has been predictive of kidney function decline in several studies. Therefore, multiparametric MRI of the kidneys has the potential to address the limitations of existing diagnostic methods to provide a noninvasive, noncontrast, and radiation-free method to assess whole kidney structure and function. Barriers to be overcome to facilitate widespread clinical application include improved understanding of biological factors that impact MRI measures, development of a larger evidence base for clinical utility, standardization of MRI protocols, automation of data analysis, determining optimal combination of MRI measures, and health economic evaluation.

Multiparametric MRI assessment of renal structure and function in acute kidney injury and renal recovery.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with a marked increase in mortality as well as subsequent chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease. We performed multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the aim of identifying potential non-invasive MRI markers of renal pathophysiology in AKI and during recovery. METHODS: Nine participants underwent inpatient MRI scans at time of AKI; seven had follow-up scans at 3 months and 1 year following AKI. Multiparametric renal MRI assessed total kidney volume (TKV), renal perfusion using arterial spin labelling, T1 mapping and blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) R2* mapping. RESULTS: Serum creatinine concentration had recovered to baseline levels at 1-year post-AKI in all participants. At the time of AKI, participants had increased TKV, increased cortex/medulla T1 and reduced cortical perfusion compared with the expected ranges in healthy volunteers and people with CKD. TKV and T1 values decreased over time after AKI and returned to expected values in most but not all patients by 1 year. Cortical perfusion improved to a lesser extent and remained below the expected range in the majority of patients by 1-year post-AKI. BOLD R2* data showed a non-significant trend to increase over time post-AKI. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a substantial increase in TKV and T1 during AKI and a marked decrease in cortical perfusion. Despite biochemical recovery at 1-year post-AKI, MRI measures indicated persisting abnormalities in some patients. We propose that such patients may be more likely to have further AKI episodes or progress to CKD and further longitudinal studies are required to investigate this. .

Randomized Controlled Trial Evidence of Cost-Effectiveness of a Multifaceted AKI Intervention Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with increased health care utilization and higher costs. The Tackling AKI study was a multicenter, pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial that demonstrated a reduced hospital length of stay after implementation of a multifaceted AKI intervention (e-alerts, care bundle, and an education program). We tested whether this would result in cost savings. METHODS: A decision-analytic tree model from the payer perspective (National Health Service in the United Kingdom) was generated on which cost-effectiveness analyses were performed using a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, accounting only for direct medical costs. Clinical data from the Tackling AKI study were used as inputs and economic and utility data derived from relevant published literature. RESULTS: A total of 24,059 AKI episodes occurred during the study period, and in 18,887 admissions the patient was discharged alive. When all AKI stages were considered together, the cost per AKI admission was £5065 in the control arm and £4333 in the intervention arm, representing an incremental cost saving of £732 per admission with the intervention. Similar results were obtained when AKI stages were included as separate variables. Costs per quality-adjusted life year were £61,194 in the control group and £51,161 in the intervention group. At a willingness to pay threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life year, the probability of the intervention being cost-effective compared with standard care was 90%. CONCLUSION: An organizational level approach to improve standards of AKI care reduces the cost of hospital admissions and is cost effective within the National Health Service in the United Kingdom.

Application of dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound in the assessment of kidney diseases.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Many forms of acute and chronic disease are linked to changes in renal blood flow, perfusion, vascular density and hypoxia, but there are no readily available methods to assess these parameters in clinical practice. Dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) is a method that provides quantitative assessments of organ perfusion without ionising radiation or risk of nephrotoxicity. It can be performed at the bedside and is suitable for repeated measurements. The purpose of this review is to provide updates from recent publications on the utility of DCE-US in the diagnosis or assessment of renal disease, excluding the evaluation of benign or malignant renal masses. RECENT FINDINGS: DCE-US has been applied in clinical studies of acute kidney injury (AKI), renal transplantation, chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetic kidney disease and to determine acute effects of pharmacological agents on renal haemodynamics. DCE-US can detect changes in renal perfusion across these clinical scenarios and can differentiate healthy controls from those with CKD. In sepsis, reduced DCE-US measures of perfusion may indicate those at increased risk of developing AKI, but this requires confirmation in larger studies as there can be wide individual variation in perfusion measures in acutely unwell patients. Recent studies in transplantation have not provided robust evidence to show that DCE-US can differentiate between different causes of graft dysfunction, although it may show more promise as a prognostic indicator of graft function 1 year after transplant. DCE-US can detect acute haemodynamic changes in response to medication that correlate with changes in renal plasma flow as measured by para-aminohippurate clearance. SUMMARY: DCE-US shows promise and has a number of advantages that make it suitable for the assessment of patients with various forms of kidney disease. However, further research is required to evidence its reproducibility and utility before clinical use can be advocated.

Quantitative assessment of renal structural and functional changes in chronic kidney disease using multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides the potential for a more comprehensive non-invasive assessment of organ structure and function than individual MRI measures, but has not previously been comprehensively evaluated in chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: We performed multi-parametric renal MRI in persons with CKD (n = 22, 61 ± 24 years) who had a renal biopsy and measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR), and matched healthy volunteers (HV) (n = 22, 61 ± 25 years). Longitudinal relaxation time (T1), diffusion-weighted imaging, renal blood flow (phase contrast MRI), cortical perfusion (arterial spin labelling) and blood-oxygen-level-dependent relaxation rate (R2*) were evaluated. RESULTS: MRI evidenced excellent reproducibility in CKD (coefficient of variation <10%). Significant differences between CKD and HVs included cortical and corticomedullary difference (CMD) in T1, cortical and medullary apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), renal artery blood flow and cortical perfusion. MRI measures correlated with kidney function in a combined CKD and HV analysis: estimated GFR correlated with cortical T1 (r = -0.68), T1 CMD (r = -0.62), cortical (r = 0.54) and medullary ADC (r = 0.49), renal artery flow (r = 0.78) and cortical perfusion (r = 0.81); log urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPCR) correlated with cortical T1 (r = 0.61), T1 CMD (r = 0.61), cortical (r = -0.45) and medullary ADC (r = -0.49), renal artery flow (r = -0.72) and cortical perfusion (r = -0.58). MRI measures (cortical T1 and ADC, T1 and ADC CMD, cortical perfusion) differed between low/high interstitial fibrosis groups at 30-40% fibrosis threshold. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive multi-parametric MRI is reproducible and correlates well with available measures of renal function and pathology. Larger longitudinal studies are warranted to evaluate its potential to stratify prognosis and response to therapy in CKD.

Global epidemiology and outcomes of acute kidney injury.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a commonly encountered syndrome associated with various aetiologies and pathophysiological processes leading to decreased kidney function. In addition to retention of waste products, impaired electrolyte homeostasis and altered drug concentrations, AKI induces a generalized inflammatory response that affects distant organs. Full recovery of kidney function is uncommon, which leaves these patients at risk of long-term morbidity and death. Estimates of AKI prevalence range from <1% to 66%. These variations can be explained by not only population differences but also inconsistent use of standardized AKI classification criteria. The aetiology and incidence of AKI also differ between high-income and low-to-middle-income countries. High-income countries show a lower incidence of AKI than do low-to-middle-income countries, where contaminated water and endemic diseases such as malaria contribute to a high burden of AKI. Outcomes of AKI are similar to or more severe than those of patients in high-income countries. In all resource settings, suboptimal early recognition and care of patients with AKI impede their recovery and lead to high mortality, which highlights unmet needs for improved detection and diagnosis of AKI and for efforts to improve care for these patients.

The reimbursement and cost of acute kidney injury: a UK hospital perspective.

BACKGROUND: Despite the great interest in acute kidney injury (AKI), there have been very few studies that examined the economic impact and costing methodologies of AKI. We aimed to examine the cost and income of AKI in hospitalised patients over a period of 1 year using the NHS costing system related to that year. METHODS: A total of 627 patients discharged between January 2008 and December 2008 with AKI were identified by International Classification of Disease 10 codes (ICD-10). Basic demographic data were collected using the hospital electronic records, and the severity of AKI was classified according to the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) classification. We calculated the total income and isolated the AKI income related to AKI-specific finished consultant episodes. Then we conducted a patient level costing exercise using relative value units (RVU) to compare the cost of AKI to the actual income. RESULTS: The total spell income for all patients was GBP 1,954,922.7; the mean total income per patient was GBP 3,752.3 (95% CI 3,594.6-3,903.9). AKIN stage 3 generated significantly higher total spell and AKI income. The estimated overall cost of treating AKI was higher than the AKI income to the Primary Care Trust (GBP 1,984,543.9 vs. 1,755,395). CONCLUSION: AKIN stage 3 has a significant economic impact when compared with AKIN stages 1 and 2. The move towards a patient level costing using RVU could be a more efficient way to match cost and income.