Evidence-Based Pain Assessment in Nonverbal Palliative Care Patients.

BACKGROUND: Central to palliative care is the early assessment and treatment of pain, whether physical, psychosocial, or spiritual. Nonverbal palliative care patients are at risk for inadequate pain assessment leading to prolonged suffering. AIMS: The purpose of this project was to implement and evaluate an evidence-based pain assessment tool for nonverbal palliative care patients. DESIGN: The Iowa Model Revised: Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Excellence in Healthcare and the Implementation Strategies for Evidence-Based Practice Guide provided the guiding frameworks. SETTINGS: On a six-bed adult inpatient Palliative Care Unit (PCU). PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS: Nonverbal palliative care patients. METHODS: Evidence supported use of the Multidimensional Objective Pain Assessment Tool (MOPAT) for nonverbal patients receiving palliative care. During an eight-week pilot, nurses recorded pain assessments on a paper form and trended pain scores over a 24-hour period. Evaluation included knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors pre- and post-pilot and was subsequently used in a Precision Implementation Approach to promote adoption. RESULTS: Nurses' attitudes toward palliative care pain assessment improved in all items on the evaluation tools. Pain was assessed using MOPAT for 74% of nonverbal palliative care patients and 88% of patients had linked pain interventions to MOPAT scores. CONCLUSIONS: MOPAT is the only valid evidence-based pain assessment tool for nonverbal patients receiving palliative care. This project led to successful adoption of the MOPAT within the PCU.

Unmet Needs for Clinical Ethics Support Services in Nurse: Based on focus group interviews.

BACKGROUND: As nurses' ethical competence in their own fields is essential, clinical ethics support services help nurses improve ethical competence. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to identify the unmet needs of ethical support for nurses in clinical settings and explore the differences by nursing units. RESEARCH DESIGN: Focus group interview design was applied. Participants and research context: Data were collected via four rounds of focus group interviews with 37 nurses at intensive care units, medical-surgical units, emergency departments and oncology units. Major questions were as follows: 'What is nurses' experience of ethical difficulties while working as a clinical nurse?' and 'What kinds of clinical ethics support services do nurses require in different clinical settings?' Inductive content analysis was performed to analyse the data. Ethical considerations: Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review of board at the College of Nursing. FINDINGS: Five categories (with 14 subcategories) were identified: difficulty providing evidence-based care, lack of support in maintaining patients' and family members' dignity, insufficient education regarding clinical ethics, loss of professional self-esteem and expectations concerning organizational support. Nurses' desire for ethical support varied according to department. CONCLUSION: Nurses face both practical and existential ethical issues that require rapid solution each day. There is a need for ethical counselling to prevent compassion fatigue and identify means via which nurses reflect on their daily lives in their own fields. In-house training should be provided for each unit, to improve ethical competence and facilitate the development of pragmatic, sensible solutions.