Contemporary Treatment of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms in 14 Countries: A Vascunet Report.

OBJECTIVE: Popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) is the second most common arterial aneurysm. Vascunet is an international collaboration of vascular registries. The aim was to study treatment and outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively registered population based data. Fourteen countries contributed data (Australia, Denmark, Finland, France, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Malta, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Serbia, Sweden, and Switzerland). RESULTS: During 2012-2018, data from 10 764 PAA repairs were included. Mean values with between countries ranges in parenthesis are given. The incidence was 10.4 cases/million inhabitants/year (2.4-19.3). The mean age was 71.3 years (66.8-75.3). Most patients, 93.3%, were men and 40.0% were active smokers. The operations were elective in 73.2% (60.0%-85.7%). The mean pre-operative PAA diameter was 32.1 mm (27.3-38.3 mm). Open surgery dominated in both elective (79.5%) and acute (83.2%) cases. A medial surgical approach was used in 77.7%, and posterior in 22.3%. Vein grafts were used in 63.8%. Of the emergency procedures, 91% (n = 2 169, 20.2% of all) were for acute thrombosis and 9% for rupture (n = 236, 2.2% of all). Thrombosis patients had larger aneurysms, mean diameter 35.5 mm, and 46.3% were active smokers. Early amputation and death were higher after acute presentation than after elective surgery (5.0% vs. 0.7%; 1.9% vs. 0.5%). This pattern remained one year after surgery (8.5% vs. 1.0%; 6.1% vs. 1.4%). Elective open compared with endovascular surgery had similar one year amputation rates (1.2% vs. 0.2%; p = .095) but superior patency (84.0% vs. 78.4%; p = .005). Veins had higher patency and lower amputation rates, at one year compared with synthetic grafts (86.8% vs. 72.3%; 1.8% vs. 5.2%; both p < .001). The posterior open approach had a lower amputation rate (0.0% vs. 1.6%, p = .009) than the medial approach. CONCLUSION: Patients presenting with acute ischaemia had high risk of amputation. The frequent use of endovascular repair and prosthetic grafts should be reconsidered based on these results.

Editor's Choice - Assessment of Correlation Between Mean Size of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm at Time of Intact Repair Against Repair and Rupture Rate in Nine Countries.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyse the mean abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter for repair in nine countries, and to determine variation in mean AAA diameter for elective AAA repair and its relationship to rupture AAA repair rates and aneurysm related mortality in corresponding populations. METHODS: Data on intact (iAAA) and ruptured infrarenal AAA (rAAA) repair for the years 2010-2012 were collected from Denmark, England, Finland, Germany, Hungary, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, and the USA. The rate of iAAA repair and rAAA per 100 000 inhabitants above 59 years old, mean AAA diameter for iAAA repair and rAAA repair, and the national rates of rAAA were assessed. National cause of death statistics were used to estimate aneurysm related mortality. Direct standardisation methods were applied to the national mortality data. Logistic regression and analysis of variance model adjustments were made for age groups, sex, and year. RESULTS: There was a variation in the mean diameter of iAAA repair (n = 34 566; range Germany = 57 mm, Denmark = 68 mm). The standardised iAAA repair rate per 100000 inhabitants varied from 10.4 (Hungary) to 66.5 (Norway), p<.01, and the standardised rAAA repair rate per 100 000 from 5.8 (USA) to 16.9 (England), p<.01. Overall, there was no significant correlation between mean diameter of iAAA repair and standardised iAAA rate (r2 = 0.04, p = .3). There was no significant correlation between rAAA repair rate (n = 12 628) with mean diameter of iAAA repair (r2 = 0.2, p = .1). CONCLUSION: Despite recommendations from learned society guidelines, data indicate variations in mean diameter for AAA repair. There was no significant correlation between mean diameter of AAA repair and rates of iAAA repair and rAAA repair. These analyses are subject to differences in disease prevalence, uncertainties in rupture rates, validations of vascular registries, causes of death and registrations.

Optical coherence tomography assessment of newgeneration mesh-covered stents after carotid stenting.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to identify the findings (by optical coherence tomography [OCT]) after carotid artery stenting (CAS) with two different types of new-generation mesh-covered stent. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixteen consecutive patients undergoing CAS with mesh-covered stents and highdefinition OCT image acquisition were enrolled in the study. Cross-sectional OCT images for the presence of strut malapposition (SM) and plaque prolapse (PP) were evaluated using a proximal or distal embolic protection device (EPD). CGuard stents were used in 11 patients (68.8%) and RoadSaver stents in five (31.2%). With OCT analysis, the incidence of SM was 20.5% for CGuard vs. 26.8% for RoadSaver, p=0.26, and the incidence of PP was 10.8% for CGuard vs. 20.7% for RoadSaver, p=0.05. No neurological complications (stroke/TIA) occurred during the procedural and post-procedural periods. CONCLUSIONS: The OCT findings of two different types of mesh-covered stent after CAS were obtained safely. Our work indicates that current mesh-covered carotid stents may show differences in SM and PP. The effect of stent design and implantation technique on OCT findings post CAS, and their relation to longterm clinical outcomes, require further evaluation.

Economic impact of endarterectomy vs carotid artery stenting: a one year, single centre study.

AIMS: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been suggested by some clinicians as an alternative to endarterectomy (CEA), especially in some specific subgroups of the population. The aim of this study is to evaluate the costs of these two procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: A review of costs was performed on all patients who underwent elective treatment of carotid artery stenosis between January and December 2006 (184 CAS vs 97 CEA). Clinical data had been prospectively gathered from both the CAS and the CEA groups, while financial data was obtained retrospectively to match hospital admissions with the generated charge from the hospital business office. In this series there was one major event in CEA and one transient ischaemic attacks (TIA) in CAS. One death procedure-related event occurred in CEA. The mean total cost associated with a single CEA was slashed integral 3,897.86, whereas the cost associated with CAS was slashed integral 3,806.66. It was apparent that the increasing costs involved in purchasing material for CAS, were balanced by the lower spending for hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Costs for CAS and CEA are comparable. In our experience, the choice between CAS and CEA is based on the comorbidity of the patient, the type of the lesion and the preferences of the patient, without economic criteria being important.