RESUMO
Globally, more than 1 billion people with disabilities are disproportionately and differentially at risk from the climate crisis. Yet there is a notable absence of climate policy, programming, and research at the intersection of disability and climate change. Advancing climate justice urgently requires accelerated disability-inclusive climate action. We present pivotal research recommendations and guidance to advance disability-inclusive climate research and responses identified by a global interdisciplinary group of experts in disability, climate change, sustainable development, public health, environmental justice, humanitarianism, gender, Indigeneity, mental health, law, and planetary health. Climate-resilient development is a framework for enabling universal sustainable development. Advancing inclusive climate-resilient development requires a disability human rights approach that deepens understanding of how societal choices and actions-characterised by meaningful participation, inclusion, knowledge diversity in decision making, and co-design by and with people with disabilities and their representative organisations-build collective climate resilience benefiting disability communities and society at large while advancing planetary health.
Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência , Resiliência Psicológica , Humanos , Direitos Humanos , Saúde Mental , Mudança ClimáticaRESUMO
This Viewpoint explains how exceptions can be used to connect patients via telehealth with a physician in another state, why this is a more practical and effective strategy, and what needs to happen for this to be a feasible solution.
Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Licenciamento , Telemedicina , Licenciamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Telemedicina/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
This Viewpoint lists the top 3 pediatric drugs and product shortages, considers the federal government's and manufacturers' ethical duty to protect children, reviews the causes for the shortages, and suggests policy changes that could help fill in the gap.
Assuntos
Indústria Farmacêutica , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Criança , Humanos , Preparações Farmacêuticas/provisão & distribuiçãoRESUMO
This Viewpoint examines the murky legal treatment of various health-related wearable or other general wellness products for patients, physicians, and manufacturers, and recommends solutions.
Assuntos
Responsabilidade Legal , Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis , Seguro de Responsabilidade CivilAssuntos
Aborto Induzido , Direitos Civis , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act , Privacidade , Direitos Sexuais e Reprodutivos , Decisões da Suprema Corte , Aborto Induzido/legislação & jurisprudência , Direitos Civis/legislação & jurisprudência , Confidencialidade , Feminino , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Jurisprudência , Gravidez , Privacidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Direitos Sexuais e Reprodutivos/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos , Direitos da Mulher/legislação & jurisprudênciaAssuntos
Exclusão Digital , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Acesso à Internet , Alfabetização Digital , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Acesso à Internet/economia , Portais do Paciente , Telemedicina , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Telehealth has the potential to address health disparities, but not without deliberate choices about how to implement it. To support vulnerable patients, health policy leaders must pursue creative solutions such as public-private partnerships, broadband infrastructure, and value-based payment. Without these initiatives or others like them, health disparities are likely to persist despite telehealth's tantalizing potential.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Política de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Parcerias Público-PrivadasAssuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Privacidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Telemedicina/legislação & jurisprudência , COVID-19 , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Previsões , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde , Licenciamento , Pandemias , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina/economia , Telemedicina/normas , Telemedicina/tendências , Estados UnidosRESUMO
CONTEXT: The opioid epidemic is a major US public health crisis. Its scope prompted significant public outreach, but this response triggered a series of journalistic articles comparing the opioid epidemic to the crack cocaine epidemic. Some authors claimed that the political response to the crack cocaine epidemic was criminal justice rather than medical in nature, motivated by divergent racial demographics. METHODS: We examine these assertions by analyzing the language used in relevant newspaper articles. Using a national sample, we compare word frequencies from articles about crack cocaine in 1988-89 and opioids in 2016-17 to evaluate media framings. We also examine articles about methamphetamines in 1992-93 and heroin throughout the three eras to distinguish between narratives used to describe the crack cocaine and opioid epidemics. FINDINGS: We find support for critics' hypotheses about the differential framing of the two epidemics: articles on the opioid epidemic are likelier to use medical terminology than criminal justice terminology while the reverse is true for crack cocaine articles. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that race and legality may influence policy responses to substance-use epidemics. Comparisons also suggest that the evolution of the media narrative on substance use cannot alone account for the divergence in framing between the two epidemics.