Inferior Clinical Outcomes for Patients with Medicaid Insurance After Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective Registry Analysis of 608 Patients.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear how type of insurance coverage affects long-term, spine-specific patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This study sought to elucidate the impact of insurance on clinical outcomes after lumbar spondylolisthesis surgery. METHODS: The prospective Quality Outcomes Database registry was queried for patients with grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent single-segment surgery. Twenty-four-month PROs were compared and included Oswestry Disability Index, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) back pain, NRS leg pain, EuroQol-5D, and North American Spine Society Satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 608 patients undergoing surgery for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (mean age, 62.5 ± 11.5 years and 59.2% women) were selected. Insurance types included private insurance (n = 319; 52.5%), Medicare (n = 235; 38.7%), Medicaid (n = 36; 5.9%), and Veterans Affairs (VA)/government (n = 17; 2.8%). One patient (0.2%) was uninsured and was removed from the analyses. Regardless of insurance status, compared to baseline, all 4 cohorts improved significantly regarding ODI, NRS-BP, NRS-LP, and EQ-5D scores (P < 0.001). In adjusted multivariable analyses, compared with patients with private insurance, Medicaid was associated with worse 24-month postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ß = 10.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9-16.5; P = 0.002) and NRS leg pain (ß =1.3; 95% CI, 0.3-2.4; P = 0.02). Medicaid was associated with worse EuroQol-5D scores compared with private insurance (ß = -0.07; 95% CI -0.01 to -0.14; P = 0.03), but not compared with Medicare and VA/government insurance (P > 0.05). Medicaid was associated with lower odds of reaching ODI minimal clinically important difference (odds ratio, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.03-0.7; P = 0.02) compared with VA/government insurance. NRS back pain and North American Spine Society satisfaction did not differ by insurance coverage (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite adjusting for potential confounding variables, Medicaid coverage was independently associated with worse 24-month PROs after lumbar spondylolisthesis surgery compared with other payer types. Although all improved postoperatively, those with Medicaid coverage had relatively inferior improvements.

Gender Equity of Promoting Practices in Academic Neurosurgery in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Women have historically been underrepresented in academic medicine, particularly in surgical subspecialties. This study investigated potential associations between gender and promoting practices in academic neurosurgery. METHODS: Faculty data, including time from residency, professorship, specialty, and h-index, were obtained from websites of the institutions listed in the American Association of Neurological Surgeons Neurosurgical Residency Training Program Directory. Demographics, training, and appointments were compared between male and female neurosurgeons. Predictors of professorship, chair, directorship, and division leadership were identified using multivariable models. RESULTS: The study examined 1629 faculty members. Women were more likely to be assistant professors (P < 0.0001), while men were more likely to be full professors (P < 0.0001), hold chair positions (P = 0.007), lead subspecialty divisions (P = 0.008), and have a higher Scopus h-index (P < 0.0001). In a multivariable analysis, years from training (P < 0.001), fellowship (P = 0.009), h-index (P < 0.001), and chair/program director/division leadership position (P < 0.001) were significant positive predictors of full professorship. Holding additional advanced degrees (P = 0.010), leading a subspecialty division (P = 0.005), and having a higher h-index (P = 0.002) positively predicted chair position. However, when accounting for all other factors, gender was not a significant predictor of full professorship, division leadership, chair, or program directorship. CONCLUSIONS: While significantly more men hold leadership positions in U.S. academic institutions, after controlling for contributing variables, there did not appear to be an association between gender and full professorship, division leadership, chair, or program directorship in academic neurosurgery. While the field still has significant work to do to achieve gender equity, these results may serve as encouragement to women who are looking to advance their careers in academic neurosurgery.

Gender-Pay Equity in Academic Neurosurgery at United States Public Universities.

Background Compensation has historically been unequal for men versus women in medical fields, particularly in surgical subspecialties.  Objective We analyzed associations between gender and compensation and identified factors associated with compensation among male and female academic neurosurgeons in the United States (US) public institutions. Methods This is a cross-sectional study of available data for the 2016-2017 fiscal years associated with male and female neurosurgical faculty from public, academic institutions within the US. The data used for analysis included total annual salary, which consisted of the base salary and additional compensation. Other gleaned data included faculty demographics, training, and academic appointments. The male and female neurosurgeons' data were separated into two respective gender groups and then were compared. Predictors of compensation were identified using univariable and non-imputed and multiply-imputed multivariable statistical models. Results The cohort was comprised of 460 neurosurgery faculty members (female n=34; male n=426). Total annual salaries were comparable between the genders. Females were more likely to be younger (p=0.001), to have completed neurosurgery training recently (p=0.003), to have had fellowship training (p=0.011), and to have lower h--indices (p=0.003) compared to males. Males and females differed in academic ranks (p=0.035) and neurosurgical subspecialties (p=0.038). Midwest (a[Formula: see text])=-US$337,516.7, p=0.002), South (a[Formula: see text]=-US$302,500.5, p=0.003), and West (a[Formula: see text]=-US$276,848.8, p=0.005) practices were independent predictors of lower annual compensation. Chair position (a[Formula: see text]=US$174,180.3, p=0.019) and associate professorship (a[Formula: see text]=US$126,633.4, p=0.037) were independent predictors of higher annual compensation. Gender was not a significant predictor of total annual compensation. Conclusions Total salaries were not different between male and female neurosurgeons in public, academic institutions in the US. Gender was not a significant predictor of total annual compensation. This study is applicable to public institutions in states with Freedom of Information Act reporting requirements.

MR imaging characteristics of oligodendroglial tumors with assessment of 1p/19q deletion status.

PURPOSE: Patients with oligodendrogliomas with allelic loss of chromosomal arm 1p and 19q have been shown, especially with anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, to have both a better initial and long-term response to chemotherapy as well as an improved overall survival. Effective treatment of patients with brain tumors requires accurate diagnostic techniques. MR imaging can be used to help differentiate between low- and high-grade tumors. We hypothesize that certain MR imaging characteristics can be used to differentiate between patients with and without 1p and 19q deletion. METHODS: Using the clinical database at the University of Virginia Neuro-Oncology Center, we identified adult patients with grade II and III oligodendroglial tumors who underwent treatment from 2002 to 2007. Age at diagnosis, gender, tumor grade, chromosomal deletion status, duration of follow-up, and MR imaging characteristics were analyzed; the latter was read by a blinded neuroradiologist. RESULTS: One hundred and four patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 44 manifested 1p/19q co-deletion and 60 patients lacked this deletion. The greatest cross-sectional area (mean) of the tumor measured 23.4 cm(2) for patients with the co-deletion and 31.7 cm(2) for patients with intact alleles (p = 0.008). In addition, inner table thinning was noted directly adjacent to seven tumors with intact 1p and 19q alleles and in no tumors with the 1p/19q co-deletion (p = 0.020). Amongst patients with pure oligodendrogliomas, those with 1p/19q co-deletion had tumors more often confined to a single lobe as compared with those patients without the co-deletion (p = 0.023). Finally, tumors with intact alleles were more often found in the temporal lobe (45.0%) as compared with co-deleted tumors (22.7%) (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: MR imaging is a valuable imaging modality for differentiating between oligodendrogliomas with or without the 1p/19q deletion. While imaging will never replace definitive tissue diagnosis, imaging characteristics such as tumor size, location, and overlying skull thinning can assist clinicians in assessing patients with oligodendroglial tumors prior to surgical or medical intervention.