Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JAMA Health Forum ; 5(6.9): e242055, 2024 Jun 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38944762

RESUMO

Importance: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' mandatory End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices (ETC) model, launched on January 1, 2021, randomly assigned approximately 30% of US dialysis facilities and managing clinicians to financial incentives to increase the use of home dialysis and kidney transplant. Objective: To assess the ETC's association with use of home dialysis and kidney transplant during the model's first 2 years and examine changes in these outcomes by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional study used claims and enrollment data for traditional Medicare beneficiaries with kidney failure from 2017 to 2022 linked to same-period transplant data from the United Network for Organ Sharing. The study data span 4 years (2017-2020) before the implementation of the ETC model on January 1, 2021, and 2 years (2021-2022) following the model's implementation. Exposure: Receiving dialysis treatment in a region randomly assigned to the ETC model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were use of home dialysis and kidney transplant. A difference-in-differences (DiD) approach was used to estimate changes in outcomes among patients treated in regions randomly selected for ETC participation compared with concurrent changes among patients treated in control regions. Results: The study population included 724 406 persons with kidney failure (mean [IQR] age, 62.2 [53-72] years; 42.5% female). The proportion of patients receiving home dialysis increased from 12.1% to 14.3% in ETC regions and from 12.9% to 15.1% in control regions, yielding an adjusted DiD estimate of -0.2 percentage points (pp; 95% CI, -0.7 to 0.3 pp). Similar analysis for transplant yielded an adjusted DiD estimate of 0.02 pp (95% CI, -0.01 to 0.04 pp). When further stratified by sociodemographic measures, including age, sex, race and ethnicity, dual Medicare and Medicaid enrollment, and poverty quartile, there was not a statistically significant difference in home dialysis use across joint strata of characteristics and ETC participation. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, the first 2 years of the ETC model were not associated with increased use of home dialysis or kidney transplant, nor changes in racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in these outcomes.


Assuntos
Hemodiálise no Domicílio , Falência Renal Crônica , Transplante de Rim , Reembolso de Incentivo , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Hemodiálise no Domicílio/estatística & dados numéricos , Hemodiálise no Domicílio/economia , Estados Unidos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medicare
2.
Am J Nephrol ; 55(4): 472-476, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38815553

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PDAP) is a serious complication of peritoneal dialysis, associated with significant morbidity, modality transition, and mortality. Here, we provide an update on the national burden of this significant complication, highlighting trends in demographics, treatment practices, and in-hospital outcomes of PDAP from 2016 to 2020. METHODS: Utilizing a national all-payer dataset of hospitalizations in the USA, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of PDAP from 2016 to 2020. We analyzed demographic, clinical, and hospital-level data, focusing on in-hospital mortality, PD catheter removal, length of stay, and healthcare expenses. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates was employed to identify risk factors associated with adverse outcomes. RESULTS: There was a stable burden of annual PDAP admissions from 2016 to 2020. Healthcare expenditures associated with PDAP were high, totaling over USD 75,000 per admission. Additionally, our data suggest geographic inconsistencies in treatment patterns, with treatment at western and teaching hospitals associated with increased rates of catheter removal relative to northeastern and non-teaching centers and a mean cost of nearly USD 55,000 more in Western states compared to Midwest states. 23.2% of episodes resulted in the removal of the PD catheter. Risk factors associated with adverse outcomes included older age, higher Charlson comorbidity index scores, peripheral vascular disease, and the need for vasopressors. CONCLUSION: PDAP is a major cause of mortality among PD patients, and there is a vital need for future studies to examine the impact of hospital location and teaching status on PDAP outcomes, which can inform treatment practices and resource allocation.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Diálise Peritoneal , Peritonite , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diálise Peritoneal/efeitos adversos , Diálise Peritoneal/economia , Diálise Peritoneal/estatística & dados numéricos , Peritonite/epidemiologia , Peritonite/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Estudos de Coortes , Fatores de Risco , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Remoção de Dispositivo/economia , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos
3.
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis ; 27(4): 320-327.e1, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33131645

RESUMO

The interface between nephrology and other fields of medicine continues to expand. With the advent of novel therapies in cancer, diagnostics and therapeutics in lithology, novel devices in cardiology, advances in women's health issues, novel diagnostics and therapies in glomerular diseases, and the national priority in home-based dialysis, several subspecialties in nephrology have emerged. This article will discuss the subspecialties of onconephrology, cardionephrology, obstetric nephrology, uronephrology, glomerular disease specialization, and home-based dialysis in nephrology. We discuss the current state of each subspecialty, recommended educational content, length of training, available training opportunities, and potential career pathways for each.


Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo , Nefropatias , Neoplasias/terapia , Nefrologia/educação , Especialização , Cardiologia/educação , Escolha da Profissão , Feminino , Cardiopatias/complicações , Cardiopatias/terapia , Hemodiálise no Domicílio , Humanos , Nefropatias/complicações , Nefropatias/prevenção & controle , Nefropatias/terapia , Neoplasias/complicações , Obstetrícia/educação , Seleção de Pessoal/métodos , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA