A survey of adult respiratory and sleep services in Aotearoa New Zealand: inequities in the provision of adult respiratory and sleep services.

AIMS: The New Zealand "Standards for Adult Respiratory and Sleep Services" were published by the Ministry of Health in 2004. A 2006 survey demonstrated major gaps in the staffing and service provision and significant variation between district health boards (DHBs). We repeated this survey in 2019/20 in order to highlight issues which should be addressed as part of health service reforms. METHODS: Survey of all adult DHB respiratory services assessing staffing and service provision. RESULTS: There is marked regional variation in staffing levels for all specialist clinicians. There are 1.18 FTE/100,000 population respiratory physicians, which is well below Australian and United Kingdom levels. Two hundred thousand people in New Zealand do not have access to a local respiratory physician. For provided services we found a four-fold variation between DHBs for CPAP treatments, six-fold for oxygen services, and eight-fold for pulmonary rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: The place of residence of New Zealanders determines access to respiratory services. There are inequities in access, with little progress made since 2006. Data on health outcomes are required. The restructure of the health service must rectify this situation. The need to end a "postcode lottery" is demonstrated when reviewing current respiratory services in New Zealand.

Setting up the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry of New Zealand: reflecting and influencing clinical practice.

AIM: To describe the establishment of a national prostate cancer clinical quality registry (PCOR-NZ) within the New Zealand healthcare system and discuss the challenges encountered and achievements obtained during its development. Additionally, to provide a descriptive snapshot of the patients enrolled thus far. METHODS: A review of the processes underpinning the start-up and maintenance of the registry was undertaken. We also extracted data from PCOR-NZ in April 2021 to report on patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2019 that had at least 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Following ethical approval in 2015, a steering committee made up of clinicians, public health specialists and patient representatives was constituted, and site recruitment commenced. Men aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of incident prostate cancer from participating sites are eligible for enrolment in PCOR-NZ. The registry functions with an opt-out consent model and captures diagnosis, treatment and short-term outcomes, with a particular focus on quality-of-life measures. As of January 2021, 100% of public hospitals and 36% of private urology clinics in New Zealand are actively participating in the registry. 5,858 men, including 411 who identified as Maori (7.0%), were diagnosed between 2016 and 2019 and enrolled in the registry. Population coverage is currently estimated to be almost 70%. Opt-out is estimated to be 2.8%. CONCLUSIONS: PCOR-NZ is providing quality diagnostic, treatment and outcome data for promoting enhancements in the care of men with prostate cancer. The registry resources are therefore valuable for informing and supporting quality improvement resourcing of this common cancer.

Assessment of a clinical pathway for investigation of haematuria that reduces the need for cystoscopy.

AIM: To evaluate prospectively a clinical pathway for investigation of haematuria that involves an initial screening using a urinary biomarker of bladder cancer (Cxbladder Triage™ (CxbT)) in combination with either a renal ultrasound or a computed tomography imaging. Only test-positive patients are referred for specialist assessment and flexible cystoscopy. METHODS: The clinical outcomes of 884 patients with haematuria who presented to their general practitioner were reviewed. Outcome measurements included the findings of laboratory tests, imaging, cystoscopies, specialist assessment and histology. RESULTS: Forty-eight transitional cell carcinomas (TCC) and three small cell carcinomas were diagnosed in the study cohort. The clinical pathway missed a solitary, small, low-risk TCC. When combined, imaging and CxbT had a sensitivity of 98.1% and a negative predictive value of 99.9% to detect a bladder cancer. Follow-up for a median of 21 months showed no further new cases of bladder cancer had occurred in the patient cohort. Review of all new bladder cancers diagnosed in the 15 months following the study showed that none had been missed by haematuria assessment using the clinical pathway. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CxbT and imaging reliably identifies patients with haematuria who can be managed safely in primary care without the need for a secondary care referral and a flexible cystoscopy.

Development and outcomes of a primary care-based sleep assessment service in Canterbury, New Zealand.

Prior to 2007, increasing demand for sleep services, plus inability to adequately triage severity, led to long delays in sleep assessment and accessing continuous positive airway pressure. We established a community sleep assessment service carried out by trained general practices using a standardised tool and overnight oximetry. All cases were discussed at a multi-disciplinary meeting, with four outcomes: severe obstructive sleep apnoea treated with continuous positive airway pressure; investigation with more complex studies; sleep physician appointment; no or non-severe sleep disorder for general practitioner management. Assessment numbers increased steadily (~400 in 2007 vs. 1400 in 2015). Median time from referral to assessment and multi-disciplinary meeting was 28 and 48 days, respectively. After the first multi-disciplinary meeting, 23% of cases were assessed as having severe obstructive sleep apnoea. More complex studies (mostly flow based) were required in 49% of patients, identifying severe obstructive sleep apnoea in a further 13%. Thirty-seven percent of patients had obstructive sleep apnoea severe enough to qualify for funded treatment. Forty-eight percent of patients received a definitive answer from the first multi-disciplinary meeting. Median time from referral to continuous positive airway pressure for 'at risk' patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea, e.g., commercial drivers, was 49 days, while patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea but not 'at risk' waited 261 days for continuous positive airway pressure. Ten percent of patients required polysomnography, and 4% saw a sleep specialist. In conclusion, establishment of a community sleep assessment service and sleep multi-disciplinary meeting led to significantly more assessments, with short waiting times for treatment, especially in high-risk patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea. Most patients can be assessed without more complex studies or face-to-face review by a sleep specialist. SLEEP DISORDERS: MORE ASSESSMENTS, SHORTER WAITS WITH COMMUNITY SLEEP SERVICE: A community-based service for common sleep disorders can provide rapid and easily accessed sleep assessment and treatment. A team led by Michael Hlavac and Michael Epton from Christchurch Hospital describe the creation of a sleep assessment service within the Canterbury district of New Zealand, in which initial assessments are conducted throughout the community by general practice teams under guidance and advice from sleep specialists at the region's largest hospital. Before the service, there were around 300 sleep assessments per year in all of Canterbury, a region with a population of around 510,000. Now, that number has more than tripled, with shorter waiting times for treatment, especially for people with severe sleep apnoea. The authors conclude that most patients can be assessed for a suspected sleep disorder without needing to visit a hospital's sleep unit.

Unmet need for referred services as measured by general practice.

INTRODUCTION Unmet needs are a key indicator of the success of a health system. Clinicians and funders in Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand were concerned that unmet health need was hidden. AIM The aim of this survey was to estimate the proportion of patients attending general practice who were unable to access clinically indicated referred services. METHODS The survey used a novel method to estimate unserviced health needs. General practitioners (GPs, n = 54) asked their patients (n = 2135) during a consultation about any health needs requiring a referred service. If both agreed that a service was potentially beneficial and not available, this was documented on an e-referral system for review. The outcomes of actual referrals were also reviewed. RESULTS The patient group was broadly representative of the Canterbury population, but over-sampled female and middle-aged people and under-sampled Maori. Data adjusted to regional demographics showed that 3.6% of patients had a GP-confirmed unserviced health need. Elective orthopaedic surgery, general surgery and mental health were areas of greatest need. Unserviced health needs were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) associated with greater deprivation, middle-age, and receiving high health-use subsidies. DISCUSSION To our knowledge, this is the first survey of GP and patient agreement on unserviced referred health needs. Measuring unserviced health needs in this way is directly relevant to service planning because the gaps identified reflect clinically indicated services that patients want and need. The survey method is an improvement on declined referral rates as a measure of need. Key factors in the method were using a patient-initiated GP consultation and an e-referral system to collect data.

Does the addition of saline infusion sonohysterography to transvaginal ultrasonography prevent unnecessary hysteroscopy in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding?

This observational case series in 65 premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding evaluated whether transvaginal ultrasound followed by saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) prevented unnecessary hysteroscopy. Although SIS indicated that hysteroscopy was unnecessary in eight women, this benefit was offset by the invasive nature of the scan, the number of endometrial abnormalities falsely detected by SIS and the cost of the additional investigation.

A regional programme to improve skin cancer management.

BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT: In 2008, public specialist and general practice services in Canterbury were unable to manage demand for skin cancer treatment. Local clinicians decided the solution was to develop a see-and-treat skin excision clinic staffed by plastic surgeons and general practitioners (GPs), and the introduction of subsidised excisions in general practice. This paper describes the collaboration between clinicians, managers and funders and the results and quality management measures of these initiatives. ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEM: There is an increasing incidence of skin cancer. GPs in Canterbury were unable to meet increasing demand for skin cancer treatment because some lacked confidence and competence in skin cancer management. There was no public funding for primary care management of skin cancer, driving patients to fully funded secondary care services. Secondary care services were at capacity, with no coordinated programme across primary and secondary care. RESULTS: The programme has resulted in a greater number of skin cancers being treated by the public health system, a reduction in waiting times for treatment, and fewer minor skin lesions being referred to secondary care. Quality measures have been achieved and are improving steadily. Development of the programme has improved working relationships between primary and secondary care clinicians. STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVEMENT: The strategy was to facilitate the working relationship between primary and secondary care and increase the capacity for skin lesion excisions in both sectors. LESSONS: Skin cancer management can be improved by a coordinated approach between primary and secondary care.