Cost-effectiveness analysis of drug-eluting beads and conventional transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Objective: To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of drug-eluting beads transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) and conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (cTACE) for first-line treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Methods: Based on the real-world clinical data of HCC patients receiving interventional therapy, a partitioned survival model was constructed for cost-effectiveness analysis. The model period is 1 month, and the research time limit is 10 years. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is used as the evaluation index. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were used to analyze the uncertainty of parameters to test the stability of the model results. Results: The ICER of the DEB-TACE group was 11,875.62 $/QALYs, which was lower than the willingness to pay threshold (WTP) of 31,499.23 $/QALYs. One-way sensitivity analysis suggested that the utility value of progression-free survival (PFS) in the DEB-TACE group had the greatest impact. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that at the level of WTP of 31,499.23 $/QALYs, DEB-TACE had a cost-effective probability of 92%. Conclusion: Under the current economic level in my country, DEB-TACE is more cost-effective than cTACE in the treatment of HCC patients.

Cost-utility analysis of centrally inserted totally implanted access port (PORT) vs. peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in the oncology chemotherapy.

Background: Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) and centrally inserted totally implanted access port (PORT) are two types of intravenous infusion devices that are widely used in clinical practice. PORTs are more expensive to insert than PICCs but have fewer complications. Two cost-utility analyses of PICCs and PORTs in China have been published, but had conflicting findings. This study aimed to compare the cost-utility of PICCs and PORTs. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational trial including 404 patients with cancer and a cross-sectional study to calculate cost and complications of a PICC and PORT. Utility was measured using the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). A cost-utility analysis was performed from a healthcare system perspective in China. Results: The average total cost of PICCs and PORTs were ¥ 4,091.7 and ¥ 4,566.8, which yielded 0.46 and 0.475 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) in a 6-month dwell time, respectively. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was ¥ 31,670.9 per QALY. A one-way sensitivity analysis showed that the base-case results were robust, and the probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of ¥ 80,976 per QALY (China's per capita GDP in 2021) the probability of a PORT being cost-effective was 96%. Conclusion: PORTs were more cost-effective than PICCs for a 6 and 12-month dwell time. The total cost for a PORT was also less than that of a PICC. PORT is therefore recommended as a medium to long-term intravenous delivery device in clinical practice.

A two-step automated quality assessment for liver MR images based on convolutional neural network.

PURPOSE: To propose an automatic approach based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) to evaluate the quality of T2-weighted liver magnetic resonance (MR) images as nondiagnostic (ND) or diagnostic (D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 150 T2-weighted liver MR imaging examinations in this retrospective study. Each slice of liver image was annotated with a label D or ND by two radiologists with seven and six years of experience, respectively. Additionally, the radiologists segmented the liver region manually as the ground truth for liver segmentation. A CNN was trained to segment the liver region and another CNN was used to classify the qualities of patches extracted from the liver region. The quality of an image was obtained from the percentage of nondiagnostic patches in all liver patches in the image. Treating nondiagnostic as positive, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and confusion matrix were used to evaluate our model. A Mann-Whitney U test was performed with the statistical significance set at 0.05. RESULTS: Our model achieved good performance with an accuracy of 88.3 %, sensitivity of 86.0 %, specificity of 89.4 %, PPV of 78.6 %, NPV of 93.4 %, and AUC of 0.911 (95 % confidence interval: 0.882-0.939, p < 0.05). The confusion matrix of our model indicated good concordance with that of the radiologists. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed two-step patch-based model achieved excellent performance when assessing the quality of liver MR images.

Quantitative Multiparametric MRI May Augment the Response to Radiotherapy in Mid-Treatment Assessment of Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the mid-treatment response to radiotherapy (RT) using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC). METHODS: 42 patients with squamous EC were prepared for DCE-MRI and DWI scans both before treatment (NRT) and after the fifth radiotherapy (5th RT). The patients were classified into two groups (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR]) according to tumor regression after treatment. The quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI (Ktrans, Kep, Ve, and ADC) were measured. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to detect the efficiency of the above parameters. RESULTS: After 1 month of RT, 29 patients were classified as CR and 11 patients were classified as PR. In the NRT group, the p values of Ktrans, Kep, Ve, and ADC were 0.004, 0.078, 0.0008, and <0.0001, respectively. After the 5th RT, the p values of the above parameters were <0.001, 0.005, 0.108, and 0.365, respectively. In the NRT group, the areas under the ROC curves of Ktrans, Ve, and ADC were 0.790, 0.617, and 0.737; the sensitivity values were 89.3, 92.5, and 90.0%; the specificity values were 69.4, 27.5, and 50.0%. In the 5th RT group, the areas under the ROC curves of Ktrans and Kep were 0.816 and 0.804; the sensitivity values were 71.2 and 95.0%; the specificity values were 81.6 and 50.0%. CONCLUSION: DCE-MRI combined with DWI is effective in the early prediction of radiotherapeutic response of EC after the 5th RT other than after the traditional final treatment.

Safety assessment of sorafenib in Chinese patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: subgroup analysis of the GIDEON study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the safety of sorafenib for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in Chinese patients. METHODS: A subgroup of 345 Chinese patients from the international database of the Global Investigation of therapeutic DEcisions in hepatocellular carcinoma and Of its treatment with sorafeNib (GIDEON) study was included in this analysis. Safety assessment measures were adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria version 3.0. RESULTS: Of 331 evaluable patients, 98% started sorafenib at 800 mg/day. The median treatment duration was 22 weeks (range, 0.1-116 weeks), and median overall survival (OS) was 322 days (10.7 months). Approximately 50% of patients had at least one adverse event, and 6% had grade 3-4 adverse events. Drug-related adverse events were experienced by 29% of patients, and 3.6% had grade 3-4 drug-related adverse events. Overall, 23% of patients (n = 77) experienced serious adverse events, among which only 1 event was drug-related (0.3%). No differences in overall adverse events, serious adverse events, and deaths were observed between Child-Pugh A and Child-Pugh B patients. The most frequent drug-related adverse events were dermatological/skin (24%), hand-foot skin reaction (20%), gastrointestinal (11%), and diarrhea (11%). The majority of adverse events occurred within 30 days of beginning sorafenib. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib has satisfactory efficacy and safety in Chinese Child-Pugh A and B patients with unresectable HCC using the recommended dosage of 800 mg/day, and the safety of sorafenib is not affected by liver function. Prophylaxis for gastrointestinal adverse events may help to decrease dose interruptions or discontinuation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ; Identifier: NCT00812175. Date of registration: December 19, 2008.

A computerized global MR image feature analysis scheme to assist diagnosis of breast cancer: a preliminary assessment.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a new computer-aided detection scheme to compute a global kinetic image feature from the dynamic contrast enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and test the feasibility of using the computerized results for assisting classification between the DCE-MRI examinations associated with malignant and benign tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The scheme registers sequential images acquired from each DCE-MRI examination, segments breast areas on all images, searches for a fraction of voxels that have higher contrast enhancement values and computes an average contrast enhancement value of selected voxels. Combination of the maximum contrast enhancement values computed from two post-contrast series in one of two breasts is applied to predict the likelihood of the examination being positive for breast cancer. The scheme performance was evaluated when applying to a retrospectively collected database including 80 malignant and 50 benign cases. RESULTS: In each of 91% of malignant cases and 66% of benign cases, the average contrast enhancement value computed from the top 0.43% of voxels is higher in the breast depicted suspicious lesions as compared to another negative (lesion-free) breast. In classifying between malignant and benign cases, using the computed image feature achieved an area under a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.839 with 95% confidence interval of [0.762, 0.898]. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the global contrast enhancement feature of DCE-MRI can be relatively easily and robustly computed without accurate breast tumor detection and segmentation. This global feature provides supplementary information and a higher discriminatory power in assisting diagnosis of breast cancer.