Transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of the right ventricle before and after caesarean delivery: A preliminary investigation.

Transthoracic echocardiographic evaluation of the right ventricle is more difficult than the left ventricle and has not been well characterised in the parturient during delivery. As a preliminary investigation, our goal was to use bedside transthoracic echocardiography to evaluate right ventricular myocardial function before and after caesarean delivery. Term parturients undergoing caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia were enrolled. Echocardiography was performed pre- and postoperatively. Assessment of myocardial function included longitudinal myocardial strain using 2D-speckle tracking for both ventricles, and fractional area change for the right ventricle. Troponin-T, creatine kinase-muscle/brain and brain natriuretic peptide were measured pre- and postoperatively. One hundred patients were enrolled; 98 completed the study. Adequate images from both timepoints (pre- and postoperatively) were obtained in 85 patients for left ventricle assessment, and 66 for the right ventricle. Right ventricular fractional area change (mean (standard deviation)) (24.9% (8.9%) to 24.9% (9.2%); P = 0.99) and strain (-19.7% (6.8%) to -18.1% (6.5%); P = 0.08) measurements suggested mild baseline dysfunction and did not change after delivery. Left ventricular strain values were normal and unchanged after delivery (-23.8% (7.4%) to -24.3% (6.7%); P = 0.51). One patient had elevated troponin-T and demonstrated worse biventricular function. Elevation of brain natriuretic peptide (n=7) was associated with mildly decreased left ventricular strain, but creatine kinase-muscle/brain (n=4) was not associated with consistent changes in cardiac function. Further investigations into peripartum right ventricular function are required to validate the findings in this preliminary study. Findings of baseline mild right ventricular dysfunction and functional changes associated with troponin-T and brain natriuretic peptide warrant rigorous investigation.

Epiaortic Ultrasound for Assessment of Intraluminal Atheroma; Insights from the REGROUP Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the use of epiaortic ultrasound in contemporary cardiac surgery, as well as its impact on surgical cannulation strategy and cerebrovascular events. DESIGN: Epiaortic ultrasound data was prospectively collected in the Randomized Endovein Graft Prospective (REGROUP) trial (VA Cooperative Studies Program #588, ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01850082), which randomized 1,150 coronary artery bypass graft patients between 2014 and 2017 to endoscopic or open-vein graft harvest. SETTING: Sixteen cardiac surgery programs within the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System with expertise at performing endoscopic vein-graft harvesting. PARTICIPANTS: Veterans Affairs patients, greater than 18 years of age, undergoing elective or urgent coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest with at least one planned saphenous vein graft were eligible for enrollment. INTERVENTIONS: Epiaortic ultrasound was performed by the surgeon using a high frequency (>7 MHz) ultrasound transducer. Two-dimensional images of the ascending aorta in multiple planes were acquired before aortic cannulation and cross-clamping. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Epiaortic ultrasound was performed in 34.1% (269 of 790) of patients in REGROUP. Among these patients, simple intraluminal atheroma was observed in 21.9% (59 269), and complex intraluminal atheroma comprised 2.2% (6 of 269). The aortic cannulation or cross-clamp strategy was modified based on these findings in 7.1% of cases (19 of 269). There was no difference in stroke between patients who underwent epiaortic ultrasound and those who did not (1.9% v 1.2% p = 0.523). CONCLUSIONS: Despite current guidelines recommending routine use of epiaortic ultrasound (IIa/B) to reduce the risk of stroke in cardiac surgery, in this contemporary trial, use remains infrequent, with significant site-to-site variability.

Anesthesia Lost in Translation: Perspective and Comprehension.

BACKGROUND: Care of non-English speaking patients poses a unique challenge to the anesthesiologist in the perioperative setting. Communication limitations can be frustrating to both the patient and provider, and at times can compromise the quality of care, resulting in health care disparities. An often overlooked, but critical component is the interaction between the anesthesia provider and the interpreter. The goal of our study was to identify misconceptions regarding anesthesia and determine common knowledge gaps amongst medical interpreters. METHODS: A survey inquiring about past perioperative experiences, level of training, and barriers to effective communication was sent to the Department of Interpreter Services (IS). Concurrently, a survey was sent to the Department of Anesthesia, about their experiences with interpreters in the perioperative setting. RESULTS: Our survey had 29 respondents from IS and 42 respondents from Anesthesia. 85% of interpreters had >5 years experience, but 96% denied having anesthesia specific training. Additionally, 42.5% of our interpreters felt that less than half of their patients were sufficiently literate to read and consent in their native language. Anesthesia providers were primarily concerned about the fidelity of the interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: Misunderstanding one another's field appears to play a significant role in the communication issues surrounding interpretation for anesthesia. Educating both departments may prove beneficial to resolving misconceptions, improving perioperative interactions and ultimately improving patient care. Based on the gathered information, a continuing education lecture was created by the Anesthesia Department in order to improve our interpreters' understanding of anesthesia, associated procedures and vocabulary.