A CBCT Assessment of Orthodontic Mini-Implant Placement.

Objectives: This study compares the precision of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and two-dimensional radiography for mini-implant implantation. Materials and Method: For 30 sites (in 15 patients between the ages of 13 and 26 years), the buccal interradicular region among the 2nd premolar and 1st molar was found to be the best location for mini-implants. Next, two groups of the mini-implant implantation process were created. Mini-implants were positioned at the CBCT data-identified sites in the CBCT group. Mini-implants were inserted in the RVG group by using two-dimensional digital radiography and a specially constructed guide. To assess the precision of the mini-implant implantation, post-placement CBCT images were acquired. The obtained data were statistically analyzed. Result: The two groups showed a statistically considerable variation in the mini-implant placement's departure from the optimal height. Due to the smaller interradicular space and decreased convenience in the posterior mandibular area, two out of 15 mini-implants in the RVG group demonstrated root contact in the mandibular jaw. Conclusion: The two-dimensional intraoral radiograph of the interradicular area provides sufficient information for mini-implant placement even though CBCT accurately visualizes the interradicular space in three dimensions.

Evaluating the efficacy of primary excision and closure for the management of lip leukoderma and introducing the surgical site morbidity score as an effective tool for assessment of postoperative morbidity.

The lips are considered of great importance for the perception of beauty and there is still a lacuna in the attempt to successfully re-pigment resistant areas of vitiligo especially the lips. No technique evolved so far ensures 100% pigmentation with a good cosmetic appearance. To study the efficacy and cosmetic outcome following primary excision and closure in the management of lip vitiligo and assessing postoperative morbidity using the created surgical site morbidity score (SSMS). Twenty-five patients with vitiligo involving the inner margin of lower lips were posted for primary excision and closure of the vitiliginous area. Patients were followed up at 7 days and every 6 months. A SSMS including pain (P), healing time (H), and presence of complications (C) as parameters for assessment of postoperative morbidity were recorded at every follow-up visit. All patients showed healthy lip mucosa within 7 days of the procedure and no recurrence was noted at 24 months of follow up. The postoperative morbidity based on the SSMS was minimal, with a mean score of P2H8C0. Primary excision and closure technique is a safe and inexpensive modality in the management of lip vitiligo with immediate results and excellent cosmetic outcomes.

Location of core diagnostic information across various sequences in brain MRI and implications for efficiency of MRI scanner utilization.

OBJECTIVE: Targeting redundancy within MRI can improve its cost-effective utilization. We sought to quantify potential redundancy in our brain MRI protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective review, we aggregated 207 consecutive adults who underwent brain MRI and reviewed their medical records to document clinical indication, core diagnostic information provided by MRI, and its clinical impact. Contributory imaging abnormalities constituted positive core diagnostic information whereas absence of imaging abnormalities constituted negative core diagnostic information. The senior author selected core sequences deemed sufficient for extraction of core diagnostic information. For validating core sequences selection, four readers assessed the relative ease of extracting core diagnostic information from the core sequences. Potential redundancy was calculated by comparing the average number of core sequences to the average number of sequences obtained. RESULTS: Scanning had been performed using 9.4±2.8 sequences over 37.3±12.3 minutes. Core diagnostic information was deemed extractable from 2.1±1.1 core sequences, with an assumed scanning time of 8.6±4.8 minutes, reflecting a potential redundancy of 74.5%±19.1%. Potential redundancy was least in scans obtained for treatment planning (14.9%±25.7%) and highest in scans obtained for follow-up of benign diseases (81.4%±12.6%). In 97.4% of cases, all four readers considered core diagnostic information to be either easily extractable from core sequences or the ease to be equivalent to that from the entire study. With only one MRI lacking clinical impact (0.48%), overutilization did not seem to contribute to potential redundancy. CONCLUSION: High potential redundancy that can be targeted for more efficient scanner utilization exists in brain MRI protocols.

A two-tiered approach to MRI for hearing loss: incremental cost of a comprehensive MRI over high-resolution T2-weighted imaging.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of two approaches to using MRI for the evaluation of patients with hearing loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a decision tree to compare the cost-effectiveness of conventional MRI with that of a proposed two-tiered model in which an initial 3D T2-weighted imaging examination was used to determine the need for comprehensive MR scanning. Three radiologists independently and blindly reviewed the 3D T2-weighted images acquired as part of the comprehensive MR examinations of 256 patients with hearing loss to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the two-tiered approach. Costs were defined in terms of both the scanner utilization time for the imaging facility and the dollar amount for payers. Effectiveness was defined in terms of the ability to correctly detect the presence or absence of disease. RESULTS: The conventional approach was less cost-effective, with a baseline incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 27,299 minutes of scanner utilization per unit increase in effectiveness. Assuming a 50% reduction in the reimbursement of the technical component from the current level by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, this result reflected an ICER of $258,664 per unit increase in effectiveness. The results of a sensitivity analysis showed the robustness of the cost-effectiveness of the two-tiered imaging approach in a variety of scenarios that reflect differences in scanning practices and possible differences in recall rates. The conventional imaging approach was absolutely dominated by the two-tiered approach in the scenarios created to reflect the expected range of prevalence of disease. CONCLUSION: A two-tiered approach to MRI provides a more cost-effective alternative to the current approach of using a comprehensive MRI examination without and with contrast material to evaluate patients with hearing loss.

Two-tiered approach to MRI for headache: a cost-effective way to use an expensive technology.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy and cost implications of a proposed two-tiered approach to MRI in patients with headache. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 245 consecutive patients with headache using MRI studies performed at a tertiary care facility between October 2009 and July 2011. Three radiologists prospectively used FLAIR sequences from these MR studies to diagnose underlying abnormality or to identify the need for a comprehensive MRI study. We compared the diagnostic efficacy and the cost implications of such a two-tiered approach with those of conventional MRI from the perspectives of the payer, the patient, and the imaging facility. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity for two-tiered (83.3% and 100%, respectively) and conventional (91% and 97.8%, respectively) MRI approaches were not significantly different. Assuming a 50% reduction in the payment for the initial limited MRI performed as a first step of the two-tiered approach, this approach would have resulted in 44.8% savings to the payer. A substantial reduction in the scanner utilization time from 4168 minutes to 1249 minutes for the two-tiered approach would have enabled increased throughput at the imaging facility. Although 27 (11%) patients would have been recalled for a comprehensive MRI study in the two-tiered approach, the average time spent in the scanner by each patient would have been less for the two-tiered approach (5.1 minutes vs 17.0 minutes). CONCLUSION: A two-tiered approach to MRI can serve as a viable cost-effective alternative to the conventional approach.