Geospatial technology for assessment of soil erosion and prioritization of watersheds using RUSLE model for lower Sutlej sub-basin of Punjab, India.

Erosion of soil by water coupled with human activities is considered as one of the most serious agents of land degradation, posing severe threat to agricultural productivity, soil health, water quality, and ecological setup. The assessment of soil erosion and recognition of problematic watersheds are pre-requisite for management of erosion hazards. In the present study, Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) integrated with remote sensing (RS) and geographic information system (GIS) has been used to assess the soil erosion in lower Sutlej River basin of Punjab, India, and prioritize the watersheds for implementation of land and water conservation measures. The total basin area was about 8577 km2 which was divided into 14 sub-watersheds with the area ranging from 357.8 to 1354 km2. The data on rainfall (IMD gridded data), soil characteristics (FAO soil map), topography (ALOS PALSAR DEM) and land use (ESRI land use and land cover map) were prepared in the form of raster layers and overlaid together to determine the average annual soil loss. The results revealed that the average annual soil loss varied from 1.26 to 25 t ha-1, whereas total soil loss was estimated to be 2,441,639 tonnes. The spatial distribution map of soil erosion showed that about 94.4% and 4.7% of the total area suffered from very slight erosion (0-5 t ha-1 year-1) and slight erosion (5-10 t ha-1 year-1), respectively, whereas 0.11% (9.38 km2) experienced very severe soil loss (> 25 t ha-1 year-1). Based on estimated average annual soil loss of sub-watersheds, WS8 was assigned the highest priority for implementation of soil and water conservation measures (323.5 t ha-1 year-1), followed by WS9 (303.8 t ha-1 year-1), whereas WS2 was given last priority owing to its lowest value of soil loss (122.02 t ha-1 year-1). The present study urges that conservation strategies should be carried out in accordance with the priority ranking of diverse watersheds. These findings can certainly be used to implement soil conservation plans and management practices in order to diminish soil loss in the river basin.

Comparative evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF assay with multiplex polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis.

BACKGROUND: Rapid and specific diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is of paramount importance to decrease morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of Xpert MTB/RIF assay (GXpert) and multiplex PCR (MPCR) using three targets (IS6110, MPB64 and protein B) for diagnosing tuberculous meningitis. METHODS: GXpert and MPCR were performed on cerebrospinal fluid samples of 225 patients out of which 80 were culture-positive confirmed cases of TBM, 100 were 'suspected' cases of TBM and 45 were non-TBM controls. rpoB gene sequencing was done for diagnosing rifampicin (Rif) resistance in all positive cases. RESULTS: GXpert and MPCR were positive in 91/180 (50.5%) and 157/180 (87.2%) confirmed or suspected TBM patients respectively. Both the tests were negative in all 45 controls. Rif resistance was detected in 14 cases by GXpert and in 13 cases by MPCR. Rif resistance was confirmed in 13 cases with rpoB gene sequencing. There was one case of false Rif resistance detected by GXpert which was Rif susceptible on rpoB gene sequencing. Cost of doing MPCR was less than USD1 whereas GXpert required USD10 per isolate. CONCLUSION: MPCR has a higher sensitivity than GXpert for diagnosing TBM. MPCR is a robust and cost effective method for diagnosis of TBM in low-resource and high-endemic countries.

Critical Illness Scoring Systems: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment to Predict the Clinical Outcomes in Scrub Typhus Patients with Organ Dysfunctions.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Scrub typhus (ST) is an acute infectious disease of variable severity caused by Orientia (formerly Rickettsia) tsutsugamushi. The disease can be complicated by organ dysfunctions and the case fatality rate (CFR) is approximately 15%, which further rises with the development of severe complications. We studied the clinical features of the ST and the performance of critical illness scoring systems (CISSs) - Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and quick SOFA (qSOFA) in predicting the clinical outcomes in complicated ST (cST) patients admitted to the emergency department. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective observational study was done in 50 patients diagnosed to have cST with one or more organ dysfunctions. Clinical features and laboratory parameters were recorded and the patients were followed up until the end of their stay in the hospital. APACHE II, SOFA, and qSOFA scores at admission were calculated and were analyzed in predicting the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The median SOFA, APACHE II, and qSOFA scores of the cohort were 7 (interquartile range [IQR] = 13-22), 8 (IQR = 5-11), and 2 (IQR = 1-3), respectively. The median duration of in-hospital stay was 9 (IQR 5-11) days and overall CFR was 8%. On bivariate analysis, both SOFA (P = 0.031) and qSOFA (P = 0.001) predicted mortality. However, only SOFA score correlated with the in-hospital stay duration (Pearson's correlation = 0.311, P = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Among the three CISSs studied, the SOFA score correlated with in-hospital stay duration and mortality, whereas the qSOFA score formed a simple as well as a convenient tool in predicting the mortality in patients of cST with organ dysfunction.

Cost-minimization analysis in the Indian subcontinent for treating Guillain Barre Syndrome patients with therapeutic plasma exchange as compared to intravenous immunoglobulin.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic Plasma Exchange (TPE) and Intravenous Immunoglobulin both are first-line treatments for Guillain Barre Syndrome; however, there is a significant difference in cost. We undertook this study to assess the cost minimization for treating Guillain Barre Syndrome patients. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial was undertaken, in which 40 Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) patients with a GBS disability score of grade four and five were enrolled. A societal perspective was adopted for the analysis and assessment of both the health system cost and out-of-pocket expenditures. Cost-minimization analysis was undertaken as both the treatments were equally effective at the end of 12 weeks. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in the GBS Disability scores during overall treatment course in both treatment groups. The Out-of-pocket cost for the immunoglobulin (IVIG) group was INR 219 247 (4298 USD) and for the TPE group was INR 104 070 (2040.5 USD). Overall INR 86 685 ($1700), that is, 53% higher cost was observed in IVIG group without any concomitant health outcome benefit. CONCLUSION: In comparison with IVIG, TPE appears to be the better option for treatment of GBS in cost-constraint countries like ours to provide an economic treatment option to most average people.

Assessment of arterial stiffness from pedal artery Korotkoff sound recordings: feasibility and potential utility.

Brachial artery (BA) Korotkoff sound (KS) timing reflects arterial stiffness. We recorded pedal artery (PA) KS in 68 healthy subjects using an electronic stethoscope and electrocardiography. Intervals between QRS complex of the electrocardiogram and KS waveform peaks (termed the QKD interval) were measured for 60 seconds, averaged, and QKD velocity (v) calculated. Carotid-BA and carotid-PA pulse wave velocities (PWVs) were measured by applanation tonometry. Analyzable KS recordings were obtained from BA and PA in 100% and 92% subjects. PA QKDv decreased less than BA QKDv with progressive cuff inflation. At diastolic blood pressure + 20 mm Hg (maximal yield), BA QKDv was independently associated with weight and pulse pressure, whereas PA QKDv was related to weight and age. PA QKDv correlated with its corresponding PWV stronger than BA QKDv. In conclusion, PA KS is optimally recorded at diastolic blood pressure + 20 mm Hg; PA QKDv is correlated with age and better correlates with PWV than does BA QKDv. This technique may provide a simple arterial stiffness measure.

Evaluation of cost of treatment of drug-related events in a tertiary care public sector hospital in Northern India: a prospective study.

AIMS: Drug related events (DREs) contribute significantly to hospital admissions. These are largely preventable events and require optimum use of the therapeutic agents. The study was conducted to analyze the cost of treatment of DREs. PATIENTS & METHODS: All visits to medical emergency department of a tertiary care public sector hospital in northern India were recorded in a prospective, non-interventional manner over a period of 4 months. DREs were recognized and were followed up till their stay in the hospital. Data about the cost generating components of direct and indirect costs of treatment of DREs were collected. The projected cost of treatment of the same DREs in a private sector hospital was estimated and compared. RESULTS: Out of 1833 admissions, 92(5.01%) were due to DREs. Maximum cases were due to non compliance (66%) followed by ADR (28%) and drug overdose (6%). The common DREs leading to ED visits were cerebrovascular accident (19.44%), followed by accelerated hypertension (18.36%) and diabetic ketoacidosis(14.04%). Total cost of management of all the 92 DREs in our hospital was calculated to be INR17,37,339(Euro 30,215). The direct cost was INR1,72,961 (Euro 3008) and the approximate indirect cost was INR15,64,378 (Euro 27,206). The projected cost of management of all the 92 DREs was estimated to be INR63,63,872(Euro 1,01, 676) in a private sector hospital. CONCLUSION: The study shows that ADEs leading to emergency department visits and hospitalizations constitute a significant economic burden. Training of the patients and the prescribers may lessen the economic burden on the patient as well as the health care system.

Early indicators of prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure: an assessment of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and King's College Hospital criteria.

While King's Hospital Criteria (KCH) criteria are used worldwide, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) is a more recently developed scoring system that has been validated as an independent predictor of patient survival in conditions for liver transplantation (LT). The aim of the present study was to compare MELD and KCH criteria with other early clinical prognostic indicators (CPI) in a cohort of patients with fulminant hepatic failure (FHF). A total of 144 patients (mean age 31.7 +/- 14.7 yr; range 12-82 yr; 62 males) with FHF due to acute viral hepatitis were included into the study. Variables found significant on univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate logistic regression analysis. A total of 52 (36.1%) patients survived, the remaining 92 (63.9%) died. Univariate analysis showed that age, duration of jaundice, jaundice-encephalopathy interval (JEI), grade of encephalopathy, presence of cerebral edema, bilirubin, prothrombin time, creatinine, and MELD score were significantly different between survivors and nonsurvivors. Multivariate logistic regression identified 6 independent CPI of adverse outcome on admission: age >or=50 yr, JEI >7 days, grade 3 or 4 encephalopathy, presence of cerebral edema, prothrombin time >or=35 seconds, and creatinine >or=1.5 mg/dL. Presence of any 3 of 6 CPI was optimum in identifying survivors and nonsurvivors. A MELD score of >or=33 was found to be best discriminant between survivors and nonsurvivors by the construction of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Any 3 CPI were superior to MELD and KCH criteria in predicting the outcome (c-statistic [95% confidence interval]: CPI 0.802 [0.726-0.878], MELD 0.717 [0.636-0.789], and KCH criteria 0.676 (0.588-0.764); P values: CPI vs. MELD 0.045, CPI vs. KCH criteria 0.019, and MELD vs. KCH criteria 0.472). In conclusion, MELD and KCH criteria are not as useful as a combination of other early CPI in predicting adverse outcome in patients with FHF due to acute viral hepatitis.