Superiority of novel automated assessment of aortic annulus by intraoperative three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in patients with severe aortic stenosis: Comparison with conventional cross-sectional assessment.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is an alternative to multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) for aortic valve sizing in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, conventional cross-sectional analysis of aortic annulus by 3D TEE has some limitations such as lengthy analytical time. A novel software for automated valve measurement has been developed for 3D TEE. We evaluated the accuracy and analytical time of aortic annular measurements using this novel automated software in the clinical setting. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 43 patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent TAVR. All patients underwent intraoperative TEE and MDCT. We measured aortic annular area by automated, semi-automated, and cross-sectional methods using 3D TEE datasets. These measurements were compared to the corresponding MDCT reference values. We also compared the analytical time of the three methods. RESULTS: Automated and semi-automated analyses required significantly shorter analytical time compared to cross-sectional analysis (automated: 30.1±5.79s, semi-automated: 74.1±15.0s, manual: 81.8±18.5s, p<0.05). Compared to MDCT measurement (393.7±81.0mm2), annular areas measured by automated and cross-sectional methods were significantly smaller (automated: 380.6±77.1mm2, cross-sectional: 374.7±76.8mm2, p<0.05), while that obtained by semi-automated method was not significantly different (387.7±75.8mm2). Annular areas determined by semi-automated and cross-sectional analyses had narrower limits of agreement (LOA) with MDCT measurements, compared to automated analysis (automated: -68.6 to 94.7mm2, semi-automated: -48.3 to 60.2mm2, cross-sectional: -40.0 to 77.9mm2). Measurements by all three methods using 3D TEE showed high correlation with MDCT measurement (automated: r=0.86, semi-automated: r=0.94, cross-sectional: r=0.93). CONCLUSIONS: For aortic annular measurements using 3D TEE in AS patients, semi-automated analysis using the novel automated software reduced analytical time while maintaining similar accuracy compared to the conventional cross-sectional analysis. This automated software may have acceptable feasibility in the clinical setting.

Reduced variability of visual left ventricular ejection fraction assessment with reference images: The Japanese Association of Young Echocardiography Fellows multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Visual estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is widely applied to confirm quantitative EF. However, visual assessment is subjective, and variability may be influenced by observer experience. We hypothesized that a learning session might reduce the misclassification rate. METHODS: Protocol 1: Visual LVEFs for 30 cases were measured by 79 readers from 13 cardiovascular tertiary care centers. Readers were divided into 3 groups by their experience: limited (1-5 years, n=28), intermediate (6-11 years, n=26), and highly experienced (12-years, n=25). Protocol 2: All readers were randomized to assess the effect of a learning session with reference images only or feedback plus reference images. After the session, 20 new cases were shown to all readers following the same methodology. To assess the concordance and accuracy pre- and post-intervention, each visual LVEF measurement was compared to overall average values as a reference. RESULTS: Experience affected the concordance in visual EF values among the readers. Groups with intermediate and high experience showed significantly better mean difference (MD), standard deviation (SD), and coefficient of variation (CV) than those with limited experience at baseline. The learning session with reference image reduced the MD, SD, and CV in readers with limited experience. The learning session with reference images plus feedback also reduced proportional bias. Importantly, the misclassification rate for mid-range EF cases was reduced regardless of experience. CONCLUSION: This large multicenter study suggested that a simple learning session with reference images can successfully reduce the misclassification rate for LVEF assessment.

3D Assessment of Features Associated With Transvalvular Aortic Regurgitation After TAVR: A Real-Time 3D TEE Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study of 3-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) aimed to demonstrate features associated with transvalvular aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and to confirm the fact that a gap between the native aortic annulus and prosthesis is associated with paravalvular AR. BACKGROUND: The mechanism of AR after TAVR, particularly that of transvalvular AR, has not been evaluated adequately. METHODS: All patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR with the Sapien device (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) had 3D TEE of the pre-procedural native aortic annulus and the post-procedural prosthetic valve. RESULTS: In the 201 patients studied, the total AR was mild in 67 patients (33%), moderate in 21 patients (10%), and severe in no patients. There were 20 patients with transvalvular AR and 82 patients with paravalvular AR. Fourteen patients had both transvalvular and paravalvular AR. Patients with transvalvular AR had larger prosthetic expansion (p <0.05), a more elliptical prosthetic shape at the prosthetic commissure level (p <0.01) and more anti-anatomical position (p <0.001), which was defined as malposition of the prosthetic commissures in relation to the native commissures, than the patients without transvalvular AR. Age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.09; p < 0.05) and effective area oversizing (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.93 to 0.99, p <0.05) were associated with mild or greater paravalvular AR. CONCLUSIONS: 3D TEE successfully demonstrated the features associated with transvalvular AR, such as large prosthetic expansion, elliptical prosthetic shape, and anti-anatomical position of prosthesis. Additionally, effective area oversizing was associated with paravalvular AR.

Assessment of Post-Procedural Aortic Regurgitation After TAVR: An Intraprocedural TEE Study.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine which echocardiographic parameters, including holodiastolic flow reversal (HDFR) in the descending aorta, were useful for grading of post-procedural aortic regurgitation (PAR) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography. BACKGROUND: Reliable assessment of PAR in a catheterization laboratory is essential for an optimal outcome after TAVR; however, such an assessment has not been determined. METHODS: Three hundred eighty patients who underwent TAVR with the Edwards (Irvine, California) balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve were retrospectively assessed by intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography. PAR was evaluated by 2-dimensional color Doppler and pulse-wave Doppler in the descending aorta. Using 2-dimensional color Doppler, we measured the cross-sectional area of the vena contracta, the circumferential extent at the aortic annular plane, the longitudinal jet length, and the jet extent (with a mosaic pattern in the left ventricular outflow tract) compared with the location of the tip of the anterior mitral leaflet (AML). Grading of PAR was determined using the following vena contracta cutoffs: mild ≤9 mm(2); moderate 10 to 29 mm(2); and severe ≥30 mm(2). Significant PAR was defined as at least moderate grade. RESULTS: All patients with consistent HDFR had significant PAR. By multivariable analysis, consistent HDFR and the jet extent beyond the tip of AML were independent predictors of significant PAR. Consistent HDFR and jet extent beyond the tip of AML predicted significant PAR with specificities of 100% and 97%, respectively. In contrast, patients with both negative HDFR and a jet extent of less than halfway to the tip of AML had no significant PAR, with 97% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of consistent HDFR and jet extent beyond the tip of AML are indicative of significant PAR after TAVR.