Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Neurointerv Surg ; 2023 Dec 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38124199

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although randomized clinical trials (RCTs) demonstrated short-term benefits of endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with a large ischemic region, little is known about the long-term cost-effectiveness or its difference by the extent of the ischemic areas. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of EVT for AIS involving a large ischemic region from the perspective of Japanese health insurance payers, and analyze it using the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS). METHODS: The Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-acute Embolism-Japan Large Ischemic Core Trial (RESCUE-Japan LIMIT) was a RCT enrolling AIS patients with ASPECTS of 3-5 initially determined by the treating neurologist primarily using MRI. The hypothetical cohort and treatment efficacy were derived from the RESCUE-Japan LIMIT. Costs were calculated using the national health insurance tariff. We stratified the cohort into two subgroups based on ASPECTS of ≤3 and 4-5 as determined by the imaging committee, because heterogeneity was observed in treatment efficacy. EVT was considered cost-effective if the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was below the willingness-to-pay of 5 000 000 Japanese yen (JPY)/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). RESULTS: EVT was cost-effective among the RESCUE-Japan LIMIT population (ICER 4 826 911 JPY/QALY). The ICER among those with ASPECTS of ≤3 and 4-5 was 19 396 253 and 561 582 JPY/QALY, respectively. CONCLUSION: EVT was cost-effective for patients with AIS involving a large ischemic region with ASPECTS of 3-5 initially determined by the treating neurologist in Japan. However, the ICER was over 5 000 000 JPY/QALY among those with an ASPECTS of ≤3 as determined by the imaging committee.

2.
Hepatol Res ; 2023 Nov 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37985222

RESUMO

AIM: Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a highly effective life-saving procedure; however, it requires substantial medical resources, and the cost-effectiveness of LDLT versus conservative management (CM) for adult patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) remains unclear in Japan. METHODS: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis using the Diagnostic Procedure Combination (DPC) data from the nationwide database of the DPC research group. We selected adult patients (18 years or older) who were admitted or discharged between 2010 and 2021 with a diagnosis of ESLD with Child-Pugh class C or B. A decision tree and Markov model were constructed, and all event probabilities were computed in 3-month cycles over a 10-year period. The willingness-to-pay per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was set at 5 million Japanese yen (JPY) (49,801 US dollars [USD]) from the perspective of the public health-care payer. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, we identified 1297 and 111,849 patients in the LDLT and CM groups, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for LDLT versus CM for Child-Pugh classes C and B was 2.08 million JPY/QALY (20,708 USD/QALY) and 5.24 million JPY/QALY (52,153 USD/QALY), respectively. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed the probabilities of being below the willingness-to-pay of 49,801 USD/QALY as 95.4% in class C and 48.5% in class B. Tornado diagrams revealed all variables in class C were below 49,801 USD/QALY while their ranges included or exceeded 49,801 USD/QALY in class B. CONCLUSIONS: Living-donor liver transplantation for adult patients with Child-Pugh class C was cost-effective compared with CM, whereas LDLT versus CM for class B patients was not cost-effective in Japan.

4.
PLoS One ; 18(5): e0280299, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37228050

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The number of people with dementia increases in an aging society; therefore, promoting policies for dementia throughout the community is crucial to creating a dementia-friendly society. Understanding the status of older adults with dementia in each region of Japan will be a helpful indicator. We calculated Dementia-free Life Expectancy and aimed to examine regional disparities and their associated factors. METHODS: We calculated Dementia-free Life Expectancy and Life Expectancy with Dementia for each secondary medical area in Japan based on the Degree of Independence in Daily Living for the Demented Elderly, using data extracted from the Japanese long-term care insurance claims database. We then conducted a partial least squares regression analysis, the objective variables being Dementia-free Life Expectancy and Life Expectancy with Dementia for both sexes at age 65, and explanatory regional-level variables included demographic, socioeconomic, and healthcare resources variables. RESULTS: The mean estimated regional-level Dementia-free Life Expectancy at age 65 was 17.33 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.27-17.38) for males and 20.05 years (95% CI 19.99-20.11) for females. Three latent components identified by partial least squares regression analysis represented urbanicity, socioeconomic conditions, and health services-related factors of the secondary medical areas. The second component explained the most variation in Dementia-free Life Expectancy of the three, indicating that higher socioeconomic status was associated with longer Dementia-free Life Expectancy. CONCLUSIONS: There were regional disparities in secondary medical area level Dementia-free Life Expectancy. Our results suggest that socioeconomic conditions are more related to Dementia-free Life Expectancy than urbanicity and health services-related factors.


Assuntos
Seguro de Assistência de Longo Prazo , Expectativa de Vida , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Envelhecimento , Demência/epidemiologia , População do Leste Asiático , Japão/epidemiologia
5.
J Infect Public Health ; 16(3): 467-473, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36738690

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A serious shortage of cefazolin (CEZ) occurred in Japan in 2019. We compared the impact of the CEZ shortage on the selection of parenteral antibiotics at affected and non-affected hospitals. METHODS: The data were extracted from a nationwide Japanese administrative database and included all hospitalized cases between April 2016 and December 2020. We defined 'hospitals with shortage' as those hospitals with a statistically significant decrease in the use of CEZ during the supply disruption period compared to the same months of the previous year; other hospitals as 'hospitals without shortage'. We determined the proportion of each selected parenteral antibiotic use to the sum of all selected antibiotic use in the two groups of hospitals during the supply disruption period and during the same months of the previous year. A controlled interrupted time series (CITS) analysis was conducted to estimate the impact of the CEZ shortage on each antibiotic use and the cost of all parenteral antibiotics per patient day in hospitals with shortage as compared to those without shortage. RESULTS: In the hospitals with shortage, the proportion of CEZ use to the sum of all selected antibiotics decreased (23.5-11.1%). The decrease in CEZ use was mainly offset by the use of ceftriaxone, ceftriaxone, and ampicillin/sulbactam. The CITS analysis showed a statistically significant increase in the use of broader-spectrum beta-lactams and clindamycin during the supply disruption period (flomoxef up 58.1%, cefotiam up 63.1%, cefmetazole up 14.5%, ceftriaxone up 13.9%, and clindamycin up 20.1%). The analysis showed no statistically significant change in the cost of all parenteral antibiotics per patient day. CONCLUSIONS: During the CEZ supply disruption, there was a statistically significant increase in the use of broader-spectrum beta-lactams and clindamycin in hospitals with shortage compared with those without shortage.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Cefazolina , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Ceftriaxona/uso terapêutico , Clindamicina , Japão
6.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 14054, 2021 07 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34253741

RESUMO

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there have been health concerns related to alcohol use and misuse. We aimed to examine the population-level change in cases of alcohol-related liver disease and pancreatitis that required admission during the COVID-19 epidemic by interrupted time series (ITS) analysis using claims data. We defined the period from April 2020, when the Japanese government declared a state of emergency, as the beginning of the COVID-19 epidemic. This ITS analysis included 3,026,389 overall admissions and 10,242 admissions for alcohol-related liver disease or pancreatitis from 257 hospitals between July 2018 and June 2020. The rate of admissions per 1000 admissions during the COVID-19 epidemic period (April 2020-June 2020) was 1.2 times (rate ratio: 1.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.12-1.33) compared to the pre-epidemic period. Analyses stratified by sex revealed that the increases in admission rates of alcohol-related liver disease or pancreatitis for females were higher than for males during the COVID-19 epidemic period. The COVID-19 epidemic in Japan might associates an increase in hospital admissions for alcohol-related liver disease and pancreatitis. Our study could support the concern of alcohol consumption and health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Assuntos
Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Álcool/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Hepatopatias/epidemiologia , Pancreatite/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Álcool/complicações , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Álcool/virologia , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/virologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Política de Saúde , Hospitalização , Humanos , Hepatopatias/complicações , Hepatopatias/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatite/complicações , Pancreatite/virologia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Admissão do Paciente , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade
7.
J Clin Periodontol ; 48(6): 774-784, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33544396

RESUMO

AIMS: To investigate the effects of regular periodontal management for people with type 2 diabetes on total healthcare expenditure, hospitalization and the introduction of insulin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected data of individuals who were prescribed diabetes medications during the fiscal year 2015 from the claims database of a prefecture in Japan. We fitted generalized linear models that had sex, age, comorbidities and the status of periodontal management during the previous two years as predictors. RESULTS: A total of 16,583 individuals were enrolled. The annual healthcare expenditure in the third year was 4% less (adjusted multiplier 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.00) in the group receiving periodontal management every year. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for all-cause hospitalization was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82-0.98). The aOR of introducing insulin in the third year for those who had not been prescribed insulin during the previous two years (n = 13,222) was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.64-0.92) in the group receiving periodontal management every year. CONCLUSION: Regular periodontal management for diabetic people was associated with reduced healthcare expenditure, all-cause hospitalization and the introduction of insulin therapy.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Farmácia , Pré-Escolar , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Gastos em Saúde , Hospitalização , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia
8.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0244852, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33382838

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In response to the coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the Japanese government declared a state of emergency on April 7, 2020. Six days earlier, the Japan Surgical Society had recommended postponing elective surgical procedures. Along with the growing public fear of COVID-19, hospital visits in Japan decreased. METHODS: Using claims data from the Quality Indicator/Improvement Project (QIP) database, this study aimed to clarify the impact of the first wave of the pandemic, considered to be from March to May 2020, on case volume and claimed hospital charges in acute care hospitals during this period. To make year-over-year comparisons, we considered cases from July 2018 to June 2020. RESULTS: A total of 2,739,878 inpatient and 53,479,658 outpatient cases from 195 hospitals were included. In the year-over-year comparisons, total claimed hospital charges decreased in April, May, June 2020 by 7%, 14%, and 5%, respectively, compared to the same months in 2019. Our results also showed that per-case hospital charges increased during this period, possibly to compensate for the reduced case volumes. Regression results indicated that the hospital charges in April and May 2020 decreased by 6.3% for hospitals without COVID-19 patients. For hospitals with COVID-19 patients, there was an additional decrease in proportion with the length of hospital stay of COVID-19 patients including suspected cases. The mean additional decrease per COVID-19 patient was estimated to 5.5 million JPY. CONCLUSION: It is suggested that the hospitals treating COVID-19 patients were negatively incentivized.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Hospitais , Tempo de Internação/economia , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/economia , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino
9.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 126: 141-153, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32540387

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine the most reliable comorbidity measure, we adapted and validated outcome-specific comorbidity scores to predict mortality and hospital charges using the comorbidities composing the Charlson and Elixhauser measures and the combination of these two used in developing Gagne's combined comorbidity scores (CC, EC, and GC, respectively). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We divided cases of patients discharged in 2016-17 from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database (n = 2,671,749) into two: one to derive weights for the scores, and the other for validation. We further validated them in subgroups, such as that with a selected diagnosis. RESULTS: The c-statistics of the models predicting in-hospital mortality using new mortality scores using the CC, EC, and GC were 0.780, 0.795, and 0.794, respectively. Among them, that using the EC showed the best calibration. To predict hospital charges and the length of hospital stay (LOS), the models using variables indicating the GC performed the best. The performances of the mortality and expenditure scores were considerably different in predicting each outcome. CONCLUSION: The new score using the EC performed the best in predicting in-hospital mortality for most situations. For hospital charges and the LOS, the binary variables of the GC showed the best results. The outcome-specific comorbidity scores should be considered for different outcomes.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/economia , Honorários e Preços/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Gerenciamento de Dados/métodos , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Alta do Paciente , Valor Preditivo dos Testes
10.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(17): e15376, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31027127

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of preoperative oral management (POM) by dentists on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), length of hospital stay, medical costs, and days of antibiotics administration following both open and thoracoscopic esophagectomy.Dental plaque is an established risk factor for postoperative pneumonia, which could be reduced by POM. However, few clinical guidelines for cancer treatment, including those for esophageal cancer, recommend POM as routine perioperative care.We extracted data of esophagectomy cases from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. We subsequently conducted propensity score (PS) analyses for multilevel data, including matching, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and standardized mortality ratio weighting (SMRW), to estimate the effect of POM by dentists on the outcomes of esophagectomy.We analyzed 3412 esophagectomy cases of which 812 were open, and 2600 were thoracoscopic surgery. In IPTW analysis to estimate the average treatment effect, the risk difference of postoperative aspiration pneumonia ranged from -2.49% to -2.02% between the POM and control groups of both open and thoracoscopic esophagectomy cases. IPTW analyses indicated that the total medical costs of thoracoscopic esophagectomy were reduced by 221,200 to 253,100 Japanese Yen (equivalent to about $2000-$2200). In PS matching and SMRW analyses to estimate average treatment effect on treated, there was no difference in outcomes between the POM and control groups.Our results suggested that in patients undergoing open or thoracoscopic esophagectomy, POM by dentists prevented the occurrence of postoperative aspiration pneumonia. It could also reduce the total medical costs of thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Thus, POM by dentists can be considered as a routine perioperative care for all patients undergoing esophagectomy, regardless of the expected risk for PPC.


Assuntos
Odontólogos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia , Assistência Perioperatória , Pneumonia Aspirativa/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Placa Dentária/economia , Placa Dentária/epidemiologia , Placa Dentária/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/economia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiologia , Esofagectomia/economia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Assistência Perioperatória/economia , Pneumonia Aspirativa/economia , Pneumonia Aspirativa/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Toracoscopia/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 1334, 2018 01 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29358718

RESUMO

The study aim was to evaluate the prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse using claim data of South Korea and to evaluate treatment patterns. The Korea National Health Insurance Corporation pay medical costs for most diseases. This study used Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service-National Inpatient Sample (HIRA-NIS) 2009-2015. Pelvic organ prolapse was defined by diagnostic code (N81.x). Of the approximately 4.5 million women included in HIRA-NIS 2009-2015, 10,305 women were selected as having pelvic organ prolapse, and the mean age of the pelvic organ prolapse group was 63.9 ± 0.2 years. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse was 180 ± 4 per 100,000 population in women older than 50 years old. In logistic regression analysis, constipation increased the prevalence of all pelvic organ prolapse (odds ratio, 4.04; 95% confidence interval, 3.52-4.63; P < 0.01). The number of women requiring pessary only and surgery only were 26 ± 2 per 100,000 population and 89 ± 1 per 100,000 population, respectively, for women over 50 years of age. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse was quite lower than in previous studies. Surgery peaked at approximately 70 years of age. Pessary increased dramatically among women after the age of 65.


Assuntos
Constipação Intestinal/complicações , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/epidemiologia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/terapia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/etiologia , Pessários , Prevalência , República da Coreia/epidemiologia
12.
Korean J Crit Care Med ; 32(3): 256-264, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31723644

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fluid overload prior to continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is an important prognostic factor. Thus, precise evaluation of fluid status is necessary to treat such patients. In this study, we investigated whether fluid assessment using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) can predict outcomes in critically ill patients requiring CRRT. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed in patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit and who required CRRT. BIA was conducted before CRRT; then, the ratio of extracellular water to total body water (ECW/TBW) was derived to estimate volume status. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients treated with CRRT were included. There were 18 men (58.1%), and the median age was 67 years (interquartile range, 51 to 78 years). Fourteen patients (45.2%) died within 28 days after CRRT initiation. Patients were divided into 16 with ECW/TBW ≥0.41 and 15 with ECW/TBW <0.41. Survival rate within 28 days was different between the two groups (P = 0.044). Cox regression analysis revealed a relationship between ECW/TBW ≥0.41 and 28-day mortality, but it was not statistically significant (hazard ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.9 to 9.8; P = 0.061). Lastly, the area under the curve of ECW/TBW for 28-day mortality was analyzed. The area under the curve of ECW/TBW was 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.92), and this was significant (P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Fluid status can be assessed using BIA in critically ill patients requiring CRRT, and BIA can predict mortality. Further large trials are needed to confirm the usefulness of BIA in critically ill patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA