Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy and Opportunity Cost.

Purpose: Changes in patient anatomy and tumor geometry pose a challenge to ensuring consistent target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing; online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) accounts for these interfractional changes by facilitating replanning before each treatment. This project explored the opportunity cost of computed tomography (CT)-based online ART by evaluating time and human resource requirements. Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) was employed to determine the cost of this time to assess if the dosimetric benefit is worthwhile. Methods and Materials: CT-based online ART was recently employed at our institution and has been used to treat pelvic disease sites (prostate, prostate bed, prostate with nodal coverage, bladder, rectum); data points from all adaptively treated patients (415 fractions) were used. Time taken for each adaptive fraction before treatment, which at our facility is best represented by the duration between 2 cone beam CT scans, was used as a broadly applicable and transferable metric, representing the additional time required for ART on top of standard image guided radiation therapy. Dosimetric effect was also considered by taking the difference of planning target volume V100% for the scheduled and adapted plans. Using recently validated TDABC at this facility, the per fraction cost of ART was determined, reflecting the added cost of ART on top of image guided radiation therapy. Results: A median time of 15.97 (interquartile range, 13.23-18.83) additional minutes was required for each adaptive fraction. TDABC demonstrated an average minimum cost per adapted fraction of $103.58. Dosimetric differences between V100% of the scheduled versus adapted plan showed a mean dosimetric difference of 15.8%. Conclusions: Although online ART decreases the uncertainty of anatomic shifts, each adaptive fraction requires more staff time, delaying completion of other tasks and increasing resource utilization. Although toxicity benefits require further studies, the implementation of progressively complex radiation therapy technologies, like ART, requires consideration of the time and human resource requirements and subsequent opportunity cost.

Assessment of the treatment approach and survival outcomes in a modern cohort of patients with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors using the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (ATRTs) are rare brain tumors that occur primarily in children under the age of 3 years. This report evaluates the treatment approach and survival outcomes in a large cohort of patients treated in the United States. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, the analysis included all ATRT patients aged 0 to 18 years who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2012 and had complete treatment data. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-one ATRT patients were evaluated. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 29.9%, and it was significantly lower for children who were less than 3 years old (5-year OS, 27.7%) versus those who were 3 years old or older (5-year OS, 37.5%; P < .001). The best outcome was seen for patients with localized disease who received trimodality therapy (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy [RT]) with a 5-year OS rate of 46.8%. The utilization of trimodality therapy significantly increased during the study period (27.7% in 2004-2008 vs 45.1% in 2009-2012; P < .01), largely because of the increased use of RT. In a multivariate analysis, treatment that did not utilize trimodality therapy was associated with significantly worse OS (hazard ratio, 2.52; 95% confidence interval (1.82-3.51). Children aged 0 to 2 years were significantly less likely to receive trimodality therapy because of decreased utilization of RT in this age group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of trimodality therapy significantly increased during the study period and was associated with improved outcomes. For patients with localized disease who received trimodality therapy, the OS rate at 5 years approached 50%. However, further research into the optimal management of children less than 3 years old is needed because of their significantly worse OS in comparison with older children. Cancer 2017;123:682-687. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Effects of Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status on Outcome in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

With modern therapy, overall survival (OS) for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia approaches 90%. However, inferior outcomes for minority children have been reported. Data on the effects of ethnicity/race as it relates to socioeconomic status are limited. Using state cancer registry data from Texas and Florida, we evaluated the impact of neighborhood-level poverty rate and race/ethnicity on OS for 4719 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. On multivariable analysis, patients residing in neighborhoods with the highest poverty rate had a 1.8-fold increase in mortality compared with patients residing in neighborhoods with the lowest poverty rate (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-2.30). Hispanic and non-Hispanic black patients also had increased risk of mortality compared with non-Hispanic white patients (Hispanic: HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01-1.39; non-Hispanic black: HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.03-1.66). On subgroup analysis, there was a 21.7% difference in 5-year OS when comparing non-Hispanic white children living in the lowest poverty neighborhoods (5-year OS, 91.2%; 95% CI, 88.6-93.2) to non-Hispanic black children living in the highest poverty neighborhoods (5-year OS, 69.5%; 95% CI, 61.5-76.1). To address such disparities in survival, further work is needed to identify barriers to cancer care in this pediatric population.