Tranexamic acid for management of heavy vaginal bleeding: barriers to access and myths surrounding its use.

Tranexamic acid is safe and effective for the treatment of heavy vaginal bleeding during menstruation and childbirth. It improves the quality of life, facilitates participation in school and work, and reduces the risk of death from postpartum hemorrhage. Despite its well-established benefits, individual- and structural-level barriers preclude its widespread utilization, hindering effective patient care and perpetuating health inequities in women's health. We first describe the evidence for the use of tranexamic acid in treating heavy menstrual bleeding and postpartum hemorrhage. Barriers to tranexamic acid use, including structural sexism, period poverty, misinformation in product monograph labeling, stigmatization of vaginal blood loss, and drug access, are then discussed. Finally, we summarize relevant data presented during the 2023 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress.

Iron deficiency anemia among women: An issue of health equity.

Iron deficiency is the most common and widespread nutritional deficiency in the world. For women, the risk of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia increases due to iron demands during pregnancy and regular iron losses due to menstruation during reproductive years. These interrelated conditions are of public health concern as they are highly prevalent, and the negative consequences such as chronic fatigue, cognitive impairment and poor quality of life are broad and multifaceted. People of low socioeconomic status are at higher risk of iron deficiency due to low intake of expensive iron-rich foods, and decreased access to healthcare. In this review, we applied a health equity lens to describe the current state of care for women with iron deficiency with or without anemia. We have highlighted several structural challenges that span from the laboratory diagnosis, inconsistent screening guidelines, and stigma associated with heavy menstrual bleeding, to treatment barriers.

Laboratory-based inequity in thrombosis and hemostasis: review of the evidence.

The concept of normal in hematology, similar to that in other areas of medicine, is anchored to the perspective of those setting the standard. This means that several laboratory reference intervals and approaches to the conditions of thrombosis and hemostasis are influenced by the vantage point of those in power. Structural inequity, including systemic racism and sexism, can lead to inappropriate normalization of disease states, such as anemia or iron deficiency, or delayed diagnoses, such as in von Willebrand disease. This review will focus on how laboratory reference intervals perpetuate the cycles of inequity in care of patients with disorders of thrombosis and hemostasis. We provide examples and case studies in maternal mortality as well as in disorders such as von Willebrand disease and iron deficiency, question physiology versus pathophysiology, acknowledge the distinction between social constructs and biologic influence, and highlight opportunities for much-needed restructuring in areas such as defining anemia and iron deficiency.

Cost-effectiveness of eltrombopag vs intravenous immunoglobulin for the perioperative management of immune thrombocytopenia.

Eltrombopag has been shown to be noninferior to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for improving perioperative platelet counts in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in a randomized trial; thus, cost is an important factor for treatment and policy decisions. We used patient-level data from the trial to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing perioperative eltrombopag 50 mg daily starting dose, with IVIG 1 or 2 g/kg (according to local practice) from a Canadian public health care payer's perspective over the observation period, from preoperative day 21 to postoperative day 28. Resource utilization data were obtained from the trial data (eltrombopag, n = 38; IVIG, n = 36), and unit costs were collected from the Ontario Schedule of Benefits, Ontario Drug Formulary, and secondary sources. All costs were adjusted to 2020 Canadian dollars. We calculated the incremental cost per patient for all patients randomized. Uncertainty was addressed using nonparametric bootstrapping. The use of perioperative eltrombopag for patients with ITP resulted in a cost-saving of $413 Canadian per patient. Compared with IVIG, the probability of eltrombopag being cost effective was 70% even with no willingness to pay. In a sensitivity analysis based on IVIG dose, we found that with the higher dose of IVIG (2 g/kg), eltrombopag saved $2,714 per patient, whereas with the lower dose of IVIG (1 g/kg), eltrombopag had a higher mean cost of $562 per patient. In summary, based on data from the randomized trial that demonstrated noninferiority, the use of eltrombopag for the management of ITP in the perioperative setting was less costly than IVIG.

Suboptimal iron deficiency screening in pregnancy and the impact of socioeconomic status in a high-resource setting.

Iron deficiency (ID) anemia in pregnancy is associated with poor maternal and childhood outcomes, yet ferritin testing, the standard test for ID, is not considered part of routine prenatal bloodwork in Canada. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 44 552 pregnant patients with prenatal testing at community laboratories in Ontario, Canada, to determine the prevalence of ferritin testing over 5 years. Secondary objectives were to determine the prevalence and severity of ID and to identify clinical and demographic variables that influence the likelihood of ID screening. A total of 59.4% of patients had a ferritin checked during pregnancy; 71.4% were ordered in the first trimester, when the risk of ID is lowest. Excluding patients with abnormally elevated ferritins, 25.2% were iron insufficient (30-44 µg/L) and 52.8% were iron deficient (≤29 µg/L) at least once in pregnancy. A total of 8.3% were anemic (hemoglobin <105 g/L). The proportion of anemic patients with a subsequent ferritin test in pregnancy ranged from 22% to 67% in the lowest and highest anemia severity categories, respectively. Lower annual household income was negatively associated with the odds of a ferritin test; compared with those in the fifth (ie, highest) income quintile, the odds of ferritin testing for patients in the first, second, and fourth quintiles were 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.91), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.74-0.91), and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77-0.97), respectively. These data highlight gaps in prenatal care and issues of health equity that warrant harmonization of obstetrical guidelines to recommend routine ferritin testing in pregnancy.

An illustrated review of bleeding assessment tools and common coagulation tests.

Recognizing the complexity of coagulation tests and currently used anticoagulants, we developed this illustrated review on bleeding assessment tools and common coagulation screening tests. Quantitative bleeding assessment tools (BATs) are available to standardize the bleeding history and improve the pretest probability prior to coagulation testing. We describe use of BATs and the principles, indications, and limitations of the prothrombin time (PT)/International Normalized Ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and 50:50 mix. Use of these tests to identify coagulation factor deficiencies, specific and nonspecific inhibitors, coagulopathy of liver disease, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and commonly used anticoagulant medications are reviewed. Current literature suggests that unnecessary coagulation testing is rampant. The PT and APTT have astoundingly low sensitivity (1.0%-2.1%) for detection of clinically significant bleeding disorders. Thus, current guidelines recommend against the use of screening PT and APTT in preoperative patients undergoing noncardiac/vascular surgery.

Tackling overutilization of hospital tests and treatments: Lessons learned from a grassroots approach.

Recent data suggest unnecessary medical testing and treatment is relatively common in Canada. A number of harms to patients can arise as a result of unnecessary tests and treatments. In addition to patient harm, unnecessary tests and treatments add to the cost of medical care. Inspired by the Choosing Wisely campaign, St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto, Ontario, developed a hospital-wide program to address many different forms of overutilization at our hospital. The program prioritizes harm reduction over cost-containment and aims to create sustainable change through grassroots clinician engagement. This article will review important lessons learned from the St. Michael's experience.

The Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Selection of Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation.

IMPORTANCE: Without third-party insurance, access to marketed drugs is limited to those who can afford to pay. We examined this phenomenon in the context of anticoagulation for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether, among older Ontarians receiving anticoagulation for NVAF, patients of higher socioeconomic status (SES) were more likely to switch from warfarin to dabigatran prior to its addition to the provincial formulary. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based retrospective cohort study of Ontarians aged 66 years and older, between 2008 and 2012. EXPOSURE: Socioeconomic status, as approximated by median neighborhood income. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURE: We identified two groups of older adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: those who appeared to switch from warfarin to dabigatran after its market approval but prior to its inclusion on the provincial formulary ("switchers"), and those with ongoing warfarin use during the same interval ("non-switchers"). RESULTS: We studied 34,797 patients, including 3183 "switchers" and 31,614 "non-switchers". We found that higher SES was associated with switching to dabigatran prior to its coverage on the provincial formulary (p<0.0001). In multivariable analysis, subjects in the highest quintile were 50% more likely to switch to dabigatran than those in the lowest income quintile (11.3% vs. 7.3%; adjusted odds ratio 1.50; 95% CI 1.32 to 1.68). Following dabigatran's addition to the formulary, the income gradient disappeared. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We documented socioeconomic inequality in access to dabigatran among patients receiving warfarin for NVAF. This disparity was eliminated following the drug's addition to the provincial formulary, highlighting the importance of timely reimbursement decisions.