New prophylactics human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines against cervical cancer.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is causatively associated with cervical cancer (CC), the fourth most common malignant disease of women worldwide. The introduction of first generation prophylactic HPV vaccines in several national vaccination programmes has substantially decreased the global incidence of HPV cervical infections. Despite the success obtained, the two-licenced bivalent and quadrivalent L1 (the major HPV capsid protein) virus-like particle (VLP)-based vaccines (2vHPV and 4vHPV) present some limitations, such as a virus-type restricted protection, the high cost of the manufacture, and an absence of therapeutic activity on the established lesions. The second-generation prophylactic HPV vaccines, constituted by alternative viral components (such as capsomere or minor capsid HPV L2 protein) or made by more cost-effective strategies of production, are undergoing an intense clinical evaluation. This review aims to offer the reader a complete and updated overview on the HPV vaccination. The authors describe the effectiveness and the limitations of the approved HPV vaccines, and highlight the main characteristics of the new generation vaccines. IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject? CC is the fourth most common cancer of women in the world. HPV is the etiologic cause of almost all CCs. After being approved by the FDA, the first prophylactic 2vHPV and 4vHPV have been implemented into a routine vaccination schedule around the world, substantially decreasing the incidence of HPV and related-diseases in countries with high coverage rates. Currently, research is focusing on finding innovative and alternative systems to produce and deliver new HPV vaccines, overcoming all of the limitations that have partly restricted the potential benefit of previous vaccines on public health. What do the results of this study add? This narrative review was performed to find all the published studies reporting the efficacy and limitations of 2vHPV and 4vHPV, and evaluating the new HPV vaccines under pre- and clinical investigation. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Next generation of HPV vaccines will address many, if not all, of the limitations associated with current vaccines and will represent a step forward in the fight against CC.

Factors Predictive of 90-Day Morbidity, Readmission, and Costs in Patients Undergoing Pelvic Exenteration.

OBJECTIVE: Pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynecological malignancies is characterized by a high rate of severe complications. Factors predictive of morbidity, readmission, and cost were analyzed. METHODS: Data of consecutive patients undergoing pelvic exenteration between January 2007 and December 2016 were prospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included in the analysis. Anterior, posterior, and total exenterations were executed in 39 (67%), 9 (16%), and 10 (17%) patients, respectively. Ten (15.5%) severe complications occurred: 8 (20.5%), 0 (0%), and 1 (10%) after anterior, posterior, and total exenterations, respectively. Radiotherapy dosage, time between radiotherapy and surgery, and previous administration of chemotherapy did not influence 90-day complications and readmission. At multivariable analysis, albumin levels less than 3.5 g/dL (odds ratio, 16.2 [95% confidence interval, 2.85-92.8]; P = 0.002) and history of deep vein thrombosis (odds ratio, 9.6 [95% confidence interval, 0.93-98.2]; P = 0.057) were associated with 90-day morbidity. Low albumin levels independently correlated with readmission (P = 0.011). The occurrence of 90-day postoperative complications and readmission increased costs of a median of +12,500 and +6000 euros, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative patient selection is a key point for the reduction of postoperative complications after pelvic exenteration. Further prospective studies are warranted to improve patient selection.

A critical assessment on the role of sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer.

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the developed countries. Although the high incidence of this occurrence no consensus, about the role of retroperitoneal staging, still exists. Growing evidence support the safety and efficacy of sentinel lymph node mapping. This technique is emerging as a new standard for endometrial cancer staging procedures. In the present paper, we discuss the role of sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer, highlighting the most controversies features.

Integration of hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of sentinel node in patients with cervical and endometrial cancer: our experience and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess whether there is an additional value of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) over lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) alone for sentinel node (SN) mapping in endometrial and cervical cancer. METHODS: Ten women with clinically cervical stage IA2 to stage IB1 and 25 women with stage I endometrial cancer underwent preoperative LSG for SN mapping. Technetium Tc 99m albumin nanocolloid was injected submucosally at 4 points of the cervix. Patients underwent SPECT/CT emission-transmission study at least 3 hours after standard planar images. Methylene blue was injected into the cervix just before surgery under general anesthesia. All patients underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and radical regional nodal dissection. Hot and/or blue nodes were labeled as SNs. RESULTS: Conventional planar imaging detection rate was 50%, whereas the detection rate of at least one SN with SPECT/CT was 91% (32/35); bilateral detection was achieved in 7 (39%) of 18 women in planar and in 17 (53%) of 32 women in SPECT/CT imaging, respectively. Bilateral detection was achieved in 57% of women (20/35). Sentinel nodes were located in external and internal iliac nodes (66%), obturator nodes (5%), internal iliac nodes (11%), common iliac nodes (9%), and presacral nodes (9%). Lymph node involvement was identified in 5 patients (14%). Sentinel node correctly predicted lymph node involvement in all node-positive patients. Sentinel node sensitivity and negative predictive value of SPECT/CT were 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography seems to improve intraoperative identification of SNs and provides additional useful information about the anatomic location of SNs compared to planar LSG in cervical and endometrial cancer.