Patterns of Palliative Treatments in Stage IV Esophageal Cancer.

Background: The 5 year survival rate of esophageal cancer is under 20%. Studies have shown that early palliative treatments can improve patient quality of life and lower depressed mood without expediting mortality. Despite these benefits, few studies have analyzed factors associated with the national variation among patients who received palliative treatment for esophageal cancer. Methods: This is a retrospective study of adults diagnosed with stage IV esophageal cancer between 2004 and 2018 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) who received palliative treatment or not (n = 43,599). Cross tabulation and binary logistic regression were performed and evaluated using SPSS. Exclusion criteria included concurrent tumors, patients under age 18, and missing data. Results: Of the 43,599 patients, 26.1% of patients received palliative interventions (n = 11,371). The majority of palliative treatment patients lived less than 6 months after diagnosis (54%) and received radiation (35.7%) or chemotherapy (34.5%) with palliative intent. The patients who received palliative treatment tended to be non-Hispanic (96.6%), white (87.2%), male (83.3%) patients between age 61 and 75 (43.8%) at a comprehensive community cancer program (38.7%) with adenocarcinoma histology (71.8%). Palliative treatment patients most commonly relied on Medicare as their primary payor (45.9%) and had a median household income over $48,000 (54.5%). Conclusion: We identified trends among stage IV esophageal cancer patients receiving palliative treatments. Patients receiving palliative treatments tended to be white, non-Hispanic men. Compared to patients who did not receive palliating treatments, this cohort was more likely to receive treatment at a comprehensive, academic, or integrated network facility.

Association Between Primary Payer Status and Survival in Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer: An National Cancer Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Colon cancer is the third most frequent cancer diagnosis, and primary payer status has been shown to be associated with treatment modalities and survival in cancer patients. The goal of our study was to determine the between-insurance differences in survival in patients with clinical stage III colon cancer using data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 130,998 patients with clinical stage III colon cancer in the NCDB diagnosed from 2004 to 2012. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression models were used to determine the association between insurance status and survival. RESULTS: Patients with private insurance plans were 28%, 30%, and 16% less likely to die than were uninsured patients, Medicaid recipients, and Medicare beneficiaries, respectively. Medicare patients were 14% were less likely to die compared with uninsured patients. Patients receiving chemotherapy were, on average, 65% less likely to die compared with the patients not receiving chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Private insurance and a greater socioeconomic status were associated with increased patient survival compared with other insurance plans or the lack of insurance. Future research should continue to unravel how socioeconomic status and insurance status contribute to the quality of care and survival of oncologic patients.

Socioeconomic status and survival for patients with melanoma in the United States: an NCDB analysis.

BACKGROUND: The importance of socioeconomic factors and healthcare treatment and outcomes for lower income patients is tremendous, affecting not only those afflicted by poverty and decreased quality of care but also physicians, healthcare professionals, and society at large. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify 80,907 patients with stage 0-4 melanoma and analyze variables to track patterns in survival and outcome. RESULTS: This study demonstrates that disparities in income, insurance status, and education affects treatment and survival rates across all stages of melanoma and seeks to establish further understanding surrounding socioeconomic factors and quality of healthcare in America. CONCLUSION: Through investigation and analysis, the goal of this study is to highlight how the existing socioeconomic gap in America impacts the quality of treatment and survival in patients diagnosed with melanoma.

Assessment of prognostic factors after primary tumor resection in metastatic colon cancer patients: a Veteran's Affairs Central Cancer Registry (VACCR) analysis, 1995-2008.

BACKGROUND: Resection of the primary tumor in metastatic colon cancer may occur for palliation of bleeding or obstruction despite distant metastases. This study evaluates clinicopathologic features that serve as prognostic markers in those patients with stage IV colon cancer who undergo resection of their primary tumor. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of stage IV colon cancer patients who underwent surgical resection of the primary tumor from 1995 to 2008 was done via the Veteran's Affairs Central Cancer Registry. Age, Charlson co-morbidity index score, extent of metastases, sex, number of lymph nodes examined, lymph node ratio (LNR), type of surgery, use of adjuvant chemotherapy, primary tumor site, and grade were studied with respect to overall survival by using log-rank and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: There were 2,625 patients with stage IV colon cancer who had primary tumor resection. Age at diagnosis, Charlson co-morbidity index score, lymph node ratio, and use of chemotherapy were found to be independent predictors of survival by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Clinicopathologic factors such as LNR, use of chemotherapy, age, co-morbidities, site of primary colon tumor, and number of sites of metastasis are all independent predictors of overall survival in patients who undergo primary colon tumor resection in the metastatic setting.