Prescription drug coverage satisfaction and medication nonadherence among Medicare beneficiaries with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence among older patients with cancer can have profound health consequences. This study examines the association between prescription drug coverage satisfaction and medication nonadherence among Medicare beneficiaries with cancer. METHODS: We analyzed the 2017 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Public Use File of beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with reported non-skin cancer (n = 806). Beneficiaries were considered to have medication nonadherence if they reported: skipping doses, taking smaller doses than prescribed, or delaying or not filling a prescription because of cost. A survey-weighted logistic model, adjusted for covariates, was conducted to examine the association between prescription drug coverage satisfaction and medication nonadherence. RESULTS: Of study beneficiaries with cancer, 14.7% reported medication nonadherence. Higher proportions of beneficiaries with medication nonadherence were dissatisfied with the amount paid for medications (33.2% vs. 11.0%, p < 0.001) and the medications included on formulary (29.5% vs 5.2%, p < 0.001). In the adjusted analysis, the risk for medication nonadherence was higher among those who were dissatisfied with the amount paid for medications (OR = 2.22; p = 0.050) and the medications included on formulary (OR = 5.03; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Strategic mitigation of these barriers is essential to improving health outcomes in this at-risk population.

Accessibility and utilisation of telehealth services among older adults during COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.

The removal of regulatory and reimbursement barriers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States presented opportunities to explore the potential of telehealth to improve access to and use of healthcare among underserved populations. Therefore, we examined factors associated with accessibility and utilisation of telehealth among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. We analysed the nationally representative Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey COVID-19 Supplement File of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years (n = 5,189), administered from 5 October 2020, through 15 November 2020. Two survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between factors (i.e., socio-demographics, co-morbidities and digital access/literacy) and whether (1) beneficiaries' regular providers offered telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic, and (2) those being offered telehealth used it. Furthermore, subgroup analyses by residing area and income status were conducted. Of study beneficiaries, 83.6% reported their regular providers offered telehealth during COVID-19. Disparities in accessibility of telehealth by sociodemographic status were observed [e.g., those living in a non-metro area (versus metro) were 7.1% (marginal effect [ME] = -7.1%; p < 0.01) less likely to report accessibility of telehealth]. Beneficiaries who had no access to internet (ME = -8.2%; p < 0.001) and had not participated in video/voice calls/conferencing prior (versus participated) (ME = -6.6%; p < 0.001) were less likely to report having access to telehealth. Among those being offered telehealth services, 43.0% reported using telehealth services. Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Black beneficiaries (e.g., Black versus White; ME = 11.3%; p < 0.01) and those with co-morbidities (versus 0-1 condition) (e.g., 2-3 co-morbidities, ME = 7.3%; p < 0.01) were more likely to report using telehealth services when offered. Similar results were observed in the subgroup analyses regarding disparities in accessibility and utilisation of telehealth. The accessibility and utilisation of telehealth have increased amidst the pandemic; however, disparities in accessibility of telehealth were observed. A telehealth triage protocol is needed to ensure underserved patients continue to receive appropriate care.

Prescription drug coverage satisfaction, cost-reducing behavior, and medication nonadherence among Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence in individuals with type 2 diabetes can lead to poor glycemic control, resulting in increased risk for diabetes-related complications. OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between factors (ie, drug coverage satisfaction and cost-reducing behavior) and medication nonadherence among Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We analyzed the 2016 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Public Use File for beneficiaries aged 65 years and older with reported type 2 diabetes (n=1,430; weighted n=5,846,943). Medicare beneficiaries were considered to have medication nonadherence if they reported skipping doses or taking smaller doses than prescribed. A survey-weighted logistic model, adjusted for sociodemographics and comorbidities, was conducted to examine associations of drug coverage satisfaction and cost-reducing behavior with medication nonadherence. RESULTS: Among Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older with type 2 diabetes, 10.3% reported medication nonadherence. In the adjusted analysis, the risk for medication nonadherence was higher among those who were dissatisfied with the amount paid for medications (OR = 2.43; P = 0.002) compared with those who were satisfied, and those who spent less on basic needs to save for medications were more likely to report medication nonadherence (OR = 2.23; P = 0.011) than those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that medication nonadherence among Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes is associated with dissatisfaction with the amount paid for medications and cost-reducing behavior. Interventions that lower medication costs for Medicare beneficiaries may help to improve medication adherence among this at-risk population. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Association of congestive heart failure with hospital outcomes among renal cancer patients in the United States: analysis of nationwide inpatient sample.

Background: Patients with renal cancer are at increased risk of comorbid congestive heart failure (CHF) due to several shared risk factors and the cardiotoxicity of some medications used for renal cancer treatment. We aimed to examine the relationship between CHF and hospital outcomes among renal cancer patients in the U.S.Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we identified hospitalizations of renal cancer patients using the 2015-2017 National Inpatient Sample. We assessed the relationship between CHF and hospital outcomes in this patient population, including in-hospital mortality, length-of-stay (LoS), and hospital costs.Results: Among the 20,321 hospitalizations of renal cancer patients identified, 6.1% involved patients with comorbid CHF (n = 1,231). The odds of in-hospital mortality did not differ based on CHF presence (odds ratio = 1.21; p = 0.354). Hospitalizations of renal cancer patients with CHF were associated with a greater LoS (incidence rate ratio = 1.44; p < 0.001) and higher hospital costs (cost ratio = 1.27; p < 0.001) than those without CHF.Conclusions: CHF in renal cancer patients is associated with increased LoS and higher hospital costs. These findings suggest that optimal management of comorbid CHF may improve hospital outcomes in patients with renal cancer and provides evidence to support the emerging field of cardio-oncology.