Simulation-based graduate medical education in MR-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: Brachytherapy is critical for the curative treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Although brachytherapy use is declining in the United States (U.S.), novel interstitial or intracavitary applicators and advances in image guidance for applicator placement and treatment planning have allowed for tumor dose escalation while reducing normal tissue toxicity. Recent survey data have suggested insufficient brachytherapy training for radiation oncology trainees in the United States. This study aimed to address these gaps by developing and piloting a simulation-based education (SBE) workshop for MR-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An SBE workshop was developed for graduate medical education (GME) trainees focusing on MR-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Four hands-on stations, simulating aspects of the procedure, were led by a team of gynecological brachytherapy experts. The learners were radiation oncology residents and fellows in a U.S. GME training program. The primary outcome was feasibility, assessed by completion of the workshop within the time constraints of the curriculum. Learners completed preworkshop and postworkshop surveys to provide information on efficacy. RESULTS: The workshop was successfully completed in a 1-h block of GME didactic time. Ten trainees completed all four stations, and all completed preworkshop and postworkshop surveys, which showed improvements in knowledge and technical proficiency. Feedback was positive, and trainees requested additional learning opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that GME-focused SBE in MR-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy was feasible. SBE provided a nonclinical environment in which to practice aspects of MR-guided brachytherapy. Ongoing work includes collaboration with other U.S. institutions. Future studies should focus on international adaptation.

Human skin in organ culture and human skin cells (keratinocytes and fibroblasts) in monolayer culture for assessment of chemically induced skin damage.

Human skin cells (epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts) in monolayer culture and human skin in organ culture were exposed to agents that are known to produce irritation (redness, dryness, edema and scaly crusts) when applied topically to skin. Among the agents used were three well accepted contact irritants (i.e., all-trans retinoic acid [RA], sodium lauryl sulfate [SLS] and benzalkonium chloride) as well as the corrosive organic mercury compound, aminophenyl mercuric acetate (APMA), and 5 contact sensitizers (oxazolone, nickel sulfate, eugenol, isoeugenol and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate [EGDM]). As a group, the contact irritants (including the corrosive mercuric compound) were cytotoxic for keratinocytes and fibroblasts and suppressed growth at lower concentrations than the contact sensitizers. The contact irritants also produced histological changes (hyperplasia, incomplete keratinization, loss of the granular layer, acantholysis and necrosis) in organ-cultured skin at dose levels at which the contact sensitizers appeared to be inert. Finally, the profile of secreted molecules from organ-cultured skin was different in the presence of contact irritants versus contact sensitizers. Taken together, these data suggest that the use of organ-cultured skin in conjunction with cells derived from the skin in monolayer culture may provide an initial approach to screening agents for deleterious changes in skin.