Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 9(11): e015503, 2020 06 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32468933

RESUMO

Background Readmission after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) poses an enormous economic burden to the US healthcare system. There are limited data on the association between length of hospital stay (LOS), readmission rate, and overall costs in patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI. Methods and Results All STEMI hospitalizations were selected in the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2010 to 2014. From the patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention, we examined the 30-day outcomes including readmission, mortality, reinfarction, repeat revascularization, and hospital charges/costs according to LOS (1-2, 3, 4, 5, and >5 days) stratified by infarct locations. The 30-day readmission rate after percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI was 12.0% in the anterior wall (AW) STEMI group and 9.9% in the non-AW STEMI group. Patients with a very short LOS (1-2 days) were readmitted less frequently than those with a longer LOS regardless of infarct locations. However, patients with a very short LOS had significantly increased 30-day readmission mortality versus an LOS of 3 days (hazard ratio, 1.91; CI, 1.16-3.16 [P=0.01]) only in the AW STEMI group. Total costs (index admission+readmission) were the lowest in the very short LOS cohort in both the AW STEMI group (P<0.001) and the non-AW STEMI group (P<0.001). Conclusions For patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI, a very short LOS was associated with significantly lower 30-day readmission and lower cumulative cost. However, a very short LOS was associated with higher 30-day mortality compared with at least a 3-day stay in the AW STEMI cohort.


Assuntos
Infarto Miocárdico de Parede Anterior/economia , Infarto Miocárdico de Parede Anterior/terapia , Custos Hospitalares , Tempo de Internação/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/economia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/economia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Idoso , Infarto Miocárdico de Parede Anterior/diagnóstico , Infarto Miocárdico de Parede Anterior/mortalidade , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
2.
Am J Med ; 129(6): 635.e15-26, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27215991

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are increasing. There are limited data examining national trends in patients hospitalized with HFpEF. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we examined 5,046,879 hospitalizations with a diagnosis of acute heart failure in 2003-2012, stratifying hospitalizations by HFpEF and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Patient and hospital characteristics, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay were examined. RESULTS: Compared with HFrEF, those with HFpEF were older, more commonly female, and more likely to have hypertension, atrial fibrillation, chronic lung disease, chronic renal failure, and anemia. Over time, HFpEF comprised increasing proportions of men and patients aged ≥75 years. In-hospital mortality rate for HFpEF decreased by 13%, largely due to improved survival in those aged ≥65 years. Multivariable regression analyses showed that pulmonary circulation disorders, liver disease, and chronic renal failure were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality, whereas treatable diseases including hypertension, coronary artery disease, and diabetes were inversely associated. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest cohort of patients hospitalized with HFpEF to date, yielding the following observations: number of hospitalizations for HFpEF was comparable with that of HFrEF; patients with HFpEF were most often women and elderly, with a high burden of comorbidities; outcomes appeared improved among a subset of patients; pulmonary hypertension, liver disease, and chronic renal failure were strongly associated with poor outcomes.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/classificação , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise de Regressão , Distribuição por Sexo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA