Perceptions on Diversity in Cardiology: A Survey of Cardiology Fellowship Training Program Directors.

Background The lack of diversity in the cardiovascular physician workforce is thought to be an important driver of racial and sex disparities in cardiac care. Cardiology fellowship program directors play a critical role in shaping the cardiology workforce. Methods and Results To assess program directors' perceptions about diversity and barriers to enhancing diversity, the authors conducted a survey of 513 fellowship program directors or associate directors from 193 unique adult cardiology fellowship training programs. The response rate was 21% of all individuals (110/513) representing 57% of US general adult cardiology training programs (110/193). While 69% of respondents endorsed the belief that diversity is a driver of excellence in health care, only 26% could quote 1 to 2 references to support this statement. Sixty-three percent of respondents agreed that "our program is diverse already so diversity does not need to be increased." Only 6% of respondents listed diversity as a top 3 priority when creating the cardiovascular fellowship rank list. Conclusions These findings suggest that while program directors generally believe that diversity enhances quality, they are less familiar with the literature that supports that contention and they may not share a unified definition of "diversity." This may result in diversity enhancement having a low priority. The authors propose several strategies to engage fellowship training program directors in efforts to diversify cardiology fellowship training programs.

Status of Early-Career Academic Cardiology: A Global Perspective.

Early-career academic cardiologists, who many believe are an important component of the future of cardiovascular care, face myriad challenges. The Early Career Section Academic Working Group of the American College of Cardiology, with senior leadership support, assessed the progress of this cohort from 2013 to 2016 with a global perspective. Data consisted of accessing National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute public information, data from the American Heart Association and international organizations, and a membership-wide survey. Although the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute increased funding of career development grants, only a small number of early-career American College of Cardiology members have benefited as funding of the entire cohort has decreased. Personal motivation, institutional support, and collaborators continued to be positive influential factors. Surprisingly, mentoring ceased to correlate positively with obtaining external grants. The totality of findings suggests that the status of early-career academic cardiologists remains challenging; therefore, the authors recommend a set of attainable solutions.

Challenges facing early career academic cardiologists.

Early career academic cardiologists currently face unprecedented challenges that threaten a highly valued career path. A team consisting of early career professionals and senior leadership members of American College of Cardiology completed this white paper to inform the cardiovascular medicine profession regarding the plight of early career cardiologists and to suggest possible solutions. This paper includes: 1) definition of categories of early career academic cardiologists; 2) general challenges to all categories and specific challenges to each category; 3) obstacles as identified by a survey of current early career members of the American College of Cardiology; 4) major reasons for the failure of physician-scientists to receive funding from National Institute of Health/National Heart Lung and Blood Institute career development grants; 5) potential solutions; and 6) a call to action with specific recommendations.

Transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary veins and left atrium in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein (PV) antrum isolation with ganglionated plexi (GP) ablation is a novel atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate acute changes in left atrial and PV flow velocities following PV antrum isolation with GP ablation using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). METHODS: TEE was performed before and after PV antrum isolation with GP ablation in 88 consecutive patients. All four PVs, when possible, were analyzed with regard to peak systolic and diastolic pulsed-wave Doppler flow velocities. Left atrial appendage emptying velocities were also obtained. PV stenosis was defined as a peak PV Doppler flow velocity of ≥110 cm/sec with spectral broadening (turbulence). RESULTS: All but four right inferior and four left inferior PVs were visualized. Compared to preablation values, both PV systolic and diastolic velocities increased after ablation (P < 0.05 for each of the four PVs). However, the systolic to diastolic ratio decreased significantly after ablation in all PVs (1.3 ± 0.6 to 0.9 ± 0.4, P < 0.0001, 1.2 ± 0.7 to 0.9 ± 0.4, P < 0.0001, 1.2 ± 0.6 to 1.0 ± 0.6, P = 0.035 and 1.1 ± 0.5 to 0.9 ± 0.5, P = 0.0001, for left superior, left inferior, right superior and right inferior PV, respectively). Left atrial appendage emptying velocities showed a trend towards higher values following ablation (62.7 ± 26.1 cm/sec vs. 67.5 ± 23.2 cm/sec, P = 0.07). Asymptomatic PV stenosis occurred in seven patients (seven PVs). CONCLUSIONS: PV antrum isolation with GP ablation acutely increased PV flow velocities and altered the pattern of PV Doppler flow signal, likely correlating with increased left atrial pressures, but did not appear to adversely impact on left atrial appendage physiology.