Survival After Septal Reduction in Patients >65 Years Old With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) is increasingly being diagnosed in elderly patients. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to study long-term outcomes of septal reduction therapies (SRT) in Medicare patients with oHCM, and hospital volume-outcome relation. METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries aged >65 years who underwent SRT, septal myectomy (SM) or alcohol septal ablation (ASA), from 2013 through 2019 were identified. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes included heart failure (HF) readmission and need for redo SRT in follow-up. Overlap propensity score weighting was used to adjust for differences between both groups. Relation between hospital SRT volume and short-term and long-term mortality was studied. RESULTS: The study included 5,679 oHCM patients (SM = 3,680 and ASA = 1,999, mean age 72.9 vs 74.8 years, women 67.2% vs 71.1%; P < 0.01). SM patients had fewer comorbidities, but after adjustment, both groups were well balanced. At 4 years (IQR: 2-6 years), although there was no difference in long-term mortality between SM and ASA (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.74-1.03; P = 0.1), on landmark analysis, SM was associated with lower mortality after 2 years of follow-up (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60-0.87; P < 0.001) and had lower need for redo SRT. Both reduced HF readmissions in follow-up vs 1 year pre-SRT. Higher-volume centers had better outcomes vs lower-volume centers, but 70% of SRT were performed in low-volume centers. CONCLUSIONS: SRT reduced HF readmission in Medicare patients with oHCM. SM is associated with lower redo and better long-term survival compared with ASA. Despite better outcomes in high-volume centers, 70% of SRT are performed in low-volume U.S. centers.

Public reporting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: The quest for the optimal scorecard.

OBJECTIVE: A number of publicly available rating algorithms are used to assess hospital performance in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, concerns remain that these algorithms fail to correlate with each other and inadequately capture the case complexity of individual center practices. METHODS: Composite star ratings for isolated CABG from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons public reporting database were extracted for 2018-2019. U.S. News & World Report Best Hospitals was used to extract CABG ratings as well as overall cardiology and heart surgery ranking, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital Compare was used to extract CABG volume and 30-day mortality. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to assess possible relationships. Expert opinion on risk adjustment and program evaluation was incorporated. RESULTS: Correlations between Society of Thoracic Surgeons star rating and U.S. News & World Report overall ranking in cardiology and heart surgery (r = 0.15) and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 30-day mortality (r = -0.27) were poor. Society of Thoracic Surgeons star rating correlated weakly with U.S. News & World Report CABG ratings (r = 0.33) and with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services CABG volume (r = 0.32), whereas the latter 2 correlated moderately (r = 0.52) with each other. Of the 75 centers with accredited cardiac surgery training programs, 13 (17%) did not participate in Society of Thoracic Surgeons public reporting. Important gaps were identified in risk assessment, and potential solutions are proposed. CONCLUSIONS: Correlations between current CABG public reporting systems are weak. Further work is needed to refine and standardize CABG rating systems to more adequately capture the scope and complexity of an individual center's clinical practice and to better inform patients.

Intraoperative post-resection assessment of septal myectomy.

Intraoperative assessment of all cardiac structures and their function is critical to the operative planning and post-intervention assessment of septal myectomy and all operations on the left ventricular outflow tract. Using a single case study, I will share my approach to both pre- and post-intervention transesophageal echocardiography assessment and how it guides decision making.

Symptom assessment and exercise impairment in surgical decision making in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: Relationship to outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the long-term outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and severe left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, in whom the decision regarding surgery (vs conservative management) was based on assessment of symptoms or exercise capacity. METHODS: This was an observational study of 1530 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (aged 50 ± 13 years, 63% were men) with severe left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (excluding those aged <18 years, with left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, and with left ventricular outflow tract gradient <30 mm Hg). A composite end point of death (excluding noncardiac causes) and/or implantable defibrillator discharge was assessed. RESULTS: Coronary artery disease, family history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and syncope were present in 15%, 17%, and 18% of patients, respectively, whereas 73% patients were in New York Heart Association class II or greater. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction, basal septal thickness, and left ventricular outflow tract gradient (resting or provocable) were 62% ± 5%, 2.2 ± 1 cm, and 101 ± 39 mm Hg, respectively. A total of 858 patients (56%) underwent exercise echocardiography, of whom 503 (59%) had exercise capacity impairment. At 8.1 ± 6 years, 990 patients (65%) underwent surgical relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, and 540 patients (35%) did not. There were 156 events (10%) (134 deaths), with 0% 30-day mortality in the surgical group. On multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, increasing age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20), coronary artery disease (HR, 1.68), worse New York Heart Association class (HR, 1.46), and atrial fibrillation (HR, 1.90) predicted higher events, whereas surgery (time-dependent covariate HR, 0.57) was associated with improved event-free survival (all P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and severe left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, in whom the decision regarding surgery was based on the presence of intractable symptoms and impaired exercise capacity, surgery was associated with significant improvement in long-term composite outcomes.

Lessons learned from balloon aortic valvuloplasty experience from the pre-transcatheter aortic valve implantation era.

BACKGROUND: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has been used as a bridge to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). Such patients are now being referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We sought to study the indications and outcomes of BAV in patients with severe AS in the pre-TAVI era. METHODS: We analyzed consecutive patients with severe AS undergoing BAV from 1990 to 2005. In these patients with no immediate surgical option, BAV was attempted to temporarily improve hemodynamics, with a goal to improve general health of the patient, and ultimately AVR. RESULTS: A total of 99 BAVs (eight repeats, one second repeat) were performed in 90 consecutive patients. Baseline ejection fraction was ≤25% in 36 (36%) patients. The 30-day mortality rate was 17% (n = 17). Of the 99 patients, 27 (30%) underwent AVR. Average follow-up of patients with and without AVR was 55 ± 57 months and 16 ± 23 months, respectively. The 6-month and 1-year survival rates in patients who underwent AVR were 81% and 78%, respectively, versus 57% and 44% in patients who did not undergo AVR (P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: BAV can be used successfully to clinically improve the health of some nonsurgical patients with severe symptomatic AS, and a proportion of these patients improve to a point where AVR can be performed. Bridging to TAVI will provide further options to high-risk patients who cannot be bridged to conventional AVR. The role of BAV in bridging to TAVI merits further study.

Decision support in surgical management of ischemic cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES: The surgical approach to ischemic cardiomyopathy maximizing survival remains a dilemma, with decisions complicated by secondary mitral regurgitation, ventricular remodeling, and heart failure. As a component of decision support, we sought to develop prediction models for comparing survival after coronary artery bypass grafting alone, coronary artery bypass grafting plus mitral valve anuloplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting plus surgical ventricular restoration, and listing for cardiac transplantation. METHODS: From 1997 to 2007, 1468 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction <30%) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting alone (n = 386), coronary artery bypass grafting plus mitral valve anuloplasty (n = 212), coronary artery bypass grafting plus surgical ventricular restoration (n = 360), or listing for cardiac transplantation (n = 510). Mean follow-up was 3.8 +/- 2.8 years, with 5577 patient-years of data available for analysis. Risk factors were identified for early and late mortality by using 80% training and 20% validation sets. Outcomes were calculated for each applicable strategy to identify which maximized predicted 5-year survival. Models were programmed as a strategic decision-support tool. RESULTS: One-, 5-, and 9-year survival were as follows, respectively: coronary artery bypass grafting, 92%, 72%, and 53%; coronary artery bypass grafting plus mitral valve anuloplasty, 88%, 57%, and 34%; coronary artery bypass grafting plus surgical ventricular restoration, 94%, 76%, and 55%; and listing for cardiac transplantation, 79%, 66%, and 54%. Risk factors included older age, higher New York Heart Association class, lower ejection fraction, longer interval from myocardial infarction to operation, and numerous comorbidities. Predicted and observed survivals in validation groups were similar (P > .1). Patient-specific simultaneous solutions of applicable models revealed therapy potentially providing maximum survival benefit. Coronary artery bypass grafting alone and listing for cardiac transplantation often maximized 5-year survival; only 15% of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting plus mitral valve anuloplasty were predicted to fare best with this therapy. CONCLUSION: Validated prediction models can aid surgeons in recommending personalized treatment plans that maximize short- and long-term survival for ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Regional referral system for patients with acute mechanical support: experience at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation.

Regional referral networks ("hub and spoke") have been created to facilitate the transfer of patients on mechanical circulatory support. Although individual centers report good success, overall outcomes have remained poor. We investigated whether preoperative variables influenced survival and could be used to help select patients best served by referral. A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients transferred to our institution supported on cardiac assist devices. Between January 1995 and September 2003, 39 patients were received in transfer for continued care after the implantation of a cardiac assist device. Eighty-five percent of patients had the ABIOMED BVS 5000 implanted. The most common indication was postcardiotomy shock. Sixty-four percent of patients were not candidates for heart transplantation due to medical or social contraindications. The 30-day mortality of this group was 62%. Survivors had less comorbidity and were less likely to have complex surgeries, neurologic impairment, and multisystem organ failure when presenting to our center. Devices were weaned in 30% of cases. Only six patients (15%) were successfully transplanted, and five of these patients have done well at follow-up. Based on our experience, we believe that cardiogenic shock patients benefit from a regional referral system if they have not had complex cardiac surgical procedures or developed multisystem organ failure. Furthermore, there is a survival advantage when using long-term devices because this allows possible recovery or transplantation.

Assessment of hemostatic activation during cardiopulmonary bypass for coronary artery bypass grafting with bivalirudin: results of a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Bivalirudin has been successfully used as a replacement for heparin during on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. This study was conducted to assess the effects of the currently suggested protocol for bivalirudin on hemostatic activation during cardiopulmonary bypass with and without cardiotomy suction. METHODS: Ten patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting were enrolled. Bivalirudin was given with a bolus of 50 mg in the priming solution and 1.0 mg/kg for the patient, followed by an infusion of 2.5 mg . kg(-1) . h(-1) until 15 minutes before the conclusion of cardiopulmonary bypass. Cardiopulmonary bypass was performed with a closed system in 5 patients with and in 5 patients without the use of cardiotomy suction. Blood samples were obtained before and after cardiopulmonary bypass. D-dimers, fibrinopeptide A, prothrombin 1 and 2 fragments, thrombin-antithrombin, and factor XIIa were determined. RESULTS: Values for factor XIIa remained almost unchanged in both groups, indicating a minor effect of contact activation. In patients without cardiotomy suction, post-cardiopulmonary bypass values for D-dimers, fibrinopeptide A, prothrombin 1 and 2 fragments, and thrombin-antithrombin were not significantly increased compared with pre-cardiopulmonary bypass values. In patients with cardiotomy suction, values obtained for these parameters had significantly increased compared with pre-cardiopulmonary bypass values and the values obtained in the group without cardiotomy suction after cardiopulmonary bypass. CONCLUSIONS: With this protocol, hemostatic activation during cardiopulmonary bypass was almost completely attenuated when cardiotomy suction was avoided. Cardiotomy suction results in considerable activation of the coagulation system and should therefore be restricted and replaced by cell saving whenever possible.

Surgical advances in heart and lung transplantation.

The successes of thoracic transplantation have led to the expansion of indications and a subsequent growth in demand for a short supply of organs. In response to this disparity, the criteria for organ donation have been liberalized. Despite these difficult challenges, with advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care of both the donor and recipient, outcomes have continued to improve over time. This article focuses on the more recent surgical advances in donor selection and management, procurement and implantation, and the impact of these advances on patient outcome.

Does off-pump coronary surgery reduce morbidity and mortality?

OBJECTIVE: To compare hospital outcomes of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. METHODS: From 1997 to 2000, primary coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 481 patients off pump and in 3231 patients on pump. Hospital outcomes were compared between propensity-matched pairs of 406 on-pump and 406 off-pump patients. The 2 groups were similar in age (P =.9), left ventricular function (P =.7), extent of coronary artery disease (P =.5), carotid artery disease (P =.4), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P =.5). However, off-pump patients had more previous strokes (P =.05) and peripheral vascular disease (P =.02); on-pump patients had a higher preoperative New York Heart Association class (P =.01). RESULTS: In the matched pairs the mean number of bypass grafts was 2.8 +/- 1.0 in off-pump patients and 3.5 +/- 1.1 in on-pump patients (P <.001). Fewer grafts were performed to the circumflex (P <.001) and right coronary (P =.006) artery systems in the off-pump patients. Postoperative mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and reoperation for bleeding were similar in the 2 groups. There was more encephalopathy (P =.02), sternal wound infection (P =.04), red blood cell use (P =.002), and renal failure requiring dialysis (P =.03) in the on-pump patients. CONCLUSIONS: Both off- and on-pump procedures produced excellent early clinical results with low mortality. An advantage of an off-pump operation was less postoperative morbidity; however, less complete revascularization introduced uncertainty about late results. A disadvantage of on-pump bypass was higher morbidity that seemed attributable to cardiopulmonary bypass.