Collaborative care programs for pregnant and postpartum individuals with opioid use disorder: Organizational characteristics of sites participating in the NIDA CTN0080 MOMs study.

INTRODUCTION: Pregnant individuals with substance use disorders face complex issues that may serve as barriers to treatment entry and retention. Several professional organizations have established recommendations on comprehensive, collaborative approaches to treatment to meet the needs of this population, but information on real-world application is lacking. Sites participating in the NIDA CTN0080 "Medication treatment for Opioid use disorder in expectant Mothers (MOMs)"-a randomized clinical trial of extended release compared to sublingual buprenorphine among pregnant and postpartum individuals (PPI)-were selected, in part, because they have a collaborative approach to treating PPI with opioid use disorder (OUD). However, organizational differences among sites and how they implement expert recommendations for collaborative care could impact study outcomes. METHODS: Prior to study launch at each of the 13 MOMs sites, investigators used the Pregnancy and Addiction Services Assessment (PAASA) to collect information about organizational factors. Input from a team of addiction, perinatal, and economic evaluation experts guided the development of the PAASA. Investigators programmed the PAASA into a web-based data system and summarized the resultant site data using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Study sites represented four US census regions. Most sites were specialty obstetrics & gynecology (OB/GYN) programs providing OUD services (n = 9, 69.2 %), were affiliated with an academic institution (n = 11, 84.6 %), and prescribed buprenorphine in an ambulatory/outpatient setting (n = 11, 84.6 %); all sites offered access to naloxone. Sites reported that their population was primarily White, utilized public insurance, and faced numerous psychosocial barriers to treatment. Although all sites offered many services recommended by expert consensus groups, they varied in how they coordinated these services. CONCLUSIONS: By providing the organizational characteristics of sites participating in the MOMs study, this report assists in filling the current gap in knowledge regarding similar programs providing services to PPI with OUD. Collaborative care programs such as those participating in MOMs are uniquely positioned to participate in research to determine the most effective models of care and to determine how research can be integrated into those clinical care settings.

Attitudes, self-efficacy, and practices related to opioid risk assessment and mitigation: A comparison of health care professionals in rural communities.

Background: Health care professionals (HCPs) play an important role in opioid misuse and opioid use disorder (OUD) screening/identification, mitigation, and referral to treatment. This study compared attitudes, self-efficacy, and practices related to opioid risk assessment and mitigation among pregnancy and non-pregnancy HCPs in rural communities. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of cross-sectional, self-report survey data of HCPs in two rural counties in southern Utah. Pregnancy HCPs were identified by a question asking whether they provide care to pregnant patients. HCPs' attitudes toward their patients with opioid misuse/OUD were measured using the Survey of Attitudes and Perceptions questionnaire. Self-efficacy and practices related to opioid risk assessment and mitigation were captured with questions asking about assessment and screening of opioid use, advisement to change opioid use behavior, and referral to treatment for OUD. We used linear regression analyses to estimate associations between HCPs' attitudes toward patients with opioid misuse/OUD and their self-efficacy and use of opioid risk assessment and mitigation practices. Results: This sample included a total of 132 HCPs, including 82 pregnancy HCPs and 50 non-pregnancy HCPs. Attitudes domains were similar among pregnancy and non-pregnancy HCPs. Among pregnancy HCPs, role adequacy (ß = .48, 95% CI = .16-.80), role legitimacy (ß = .72, 95% CI = .21-1.22), motivation (ß = .68, 95% CI = .14-1.21), and positive task-specific self-esteem (ß = 1.52, 95% CI = .70-2.35) were positively associated with more frequent use of opioid risk assessment and mitigation practices, while attitudes were not associated with these practices among non-pregnancy HCPs. Conclusions: Training initiatives that lead to improved HCP attitudes could improve opioid care management among rural pregnancy HCPs. More research is needed to determine approaches to increase the use of opioid risk assessment and mitigation practices among rural non-pregnancy HCPs.

Directly Measured Costs of Severe Maternal Morbidity Events during Delivery Admission Compared with Uncomplicated Deliveries.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the actual excess costs of care for delivery admissions complicated by severe maternal morbidity (SMM) compared with uncomplicated deliveries. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of all deliveries between October 2015 and September 2018 at a single tertiary academic center. Pregnant individuals ≥ 20 weeks' gestation who delivered during a hospital admission (i.e., a "delivery admission") were included. The primary exposure was SMM, as defined by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria, CDC criteria excluding blood transfusion, or by validated hospital-defined criteria (intensive care unit admission or ≥ 4 units of blood products). Potential SMM events identified via administrative and blood bank data were reviewed to confirm SMM events had occurred. Primary outcome was total actual costs of delivery admission derived from time-based accounting and acquisition costs in the institutional Value Driven Outcomes database. Cost of delivery admissions with SMM events was compared with the cost of uncomplicated delivery using adjusted generalized linear models, with separate models for each of the SMM definitions. Relative cost differences are reported due to data restrictions. RESULTS: Of 12,367 eligible individuals, 12,361 had complete cost data. Two hundred and eighty individuals (2.3%) had confirmed SMM events meeting CDC criteria. CDC criteria excluding transfusion alone occurred in 1.0% (n = 121) and hospital-defined SMM in 0.6% (n = 76). In adjusted models, SMM events by CDC criteria were associated with a relative cost increase of 2.45 times (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.29-2.61) the cost of an uncomplicated delivery. SMM by CDC criteria excluding transfusion alone was associated with a relative increase of 3.26 (95% CI: 2.95-3.60) and hospital-defined SMM with a 4.19-fold (95% CI: 3.64-4.83) increase. Each additional CDC subcategory of SMM diagnoses conferred a relative cost increase of 1.60 (95% CI: 1.43-1.79). CONCLUSION: SMM is associated with between 2.5- and 4-fold higher cost than uncomplicated deliveries. KEY POINTS: · Severe maternal morbidity as defined by CDC criteria confers a 2.5-fold increase in delivery hospitalization costs.. · Intensive care unit admission or ≥ 4 units of blood products confer a fourfold increase in cost.. · Costs of maternal morbidity may motivate SMM review..

Trends in Opioid and Psychotropic Prescription in Pregnancy in the United States From 2001 to 2015 in a Privately Insured Population : A Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Opioid and psychotropic prescriptions are common during pregnancy. Little is known about coprescriptions of both medications in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To describe opioid prescription among women who are prescribed psychotropics compared with women who are not. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: U.S. commercial insurance beneficiaries from MarketScan (2001 to 2015). PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women at 22 weeks' gestation or greater who were insured continuously for 3 months or more before pregnancy through delivery. MEASUREMENTS: Opioid prescription, dosage thresholds (morphine milligram equivalents [MME] of ≥50/day and ≥90/day), number of opioid agents (≥2), and duration (≥30 days) among those with and without prescription of psychotropics, from 2011 to 2015. RESULTS: Among 958 980 pregnant women, 10% received opioids only, 6% psychotropics only, and 2% opioids with coprescription of psychotropics. Opioid prescription was higher among women prescribed psychotropics versus those who were not (26.5% vs. 10.7%). From 2001 to 2015, psychotropic prescription overall increased from 4.4% to 7.6%, opioid prescription without coprescription of psychotropics decreased from 11.9% to 8.4%, and opioids with coprescription decreased from 28.1% to 22.0%. Morphine milligram equivalents of 50 or greater per day decreased for women with and without coprescription (29.6% to 17.3% and 22.8% to 18.5%, respectively); MME of 90 or greater per day also decreased in both groups (15.0% to 4.7% and 11.5% to 4.2%, respectively). Women prescribed opioids only were more likely to have an antepartum hospitalization compared with those with neither prescription, as were women with coprescription versus those prescribed psychotropics only. Compared with those prescribed opioids only, women with coprescriptions were more likely to exceed MME of 90 or greater per day and to be prescribed 2 or more opioid agents and for 30 days or longer. Number and duration of opioids increased with benzodiazepine and gabapentin coprescription. LIMITATION: Inability to determine appropriateness of prescribing or overdose events. CONCLUSION: Opioids are frequently coprescribed with psychotropic medication during pregnancy and are associated with antepartum hospitalization. A substantial proportion of pregnant women are prescribed opioids at doses that increase overdose risk and exceed daily recommendations. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

Special considerations--Induction of labor in low-resource settings.

Induction of labor in resource-limited settings has the potential to significantly improve health outcomes for both mothers and infants. However, there are relatively little context-specific data to guide practice, and few specific guidelines. Also, there may be considerable issues regarding the facilities and organizational capacities necessary to support safe practices in many aspects of obstetrical practice, and for induction of labor in particular. Herein we describe the various opportunities as well as challenges presented by induction of labor in these settings.

Correlates of pregnancy before age 15 compared with pregnancy between the ages of 15 and 19 in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy risk factors and outcomes between females in the United States with pregnancy occurring before age 15 years and between ages 15 and 19 years. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2006 to 2010 National Survey of Family Growth. Our sample included women aged 20 to 44 years at the time of interview who reported first pregnancy before age 20 years (n=3,095). Using weighted multivariable logistic regression, we compared demographics, family characteristics, sexual debut circumstances, and pregnancy intendedness and outcome among females with pregnancy occurring before age 15 years and between the ages of 15 and 19 years. RESULTS: Overall, 3.4% (n=289) of women reported their first pregnancy occurring before age 15 years, and 39.5% (n=3,095) of women reported their first pregnancy between ages 15 and 19 years. Women with pregnancies before age 15 years were more likely to be Hispanic (23.5% compared with 22.4%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-3.20), to be black (31.7% compared with 19.4%, adjusted OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.47-3.42), to report their first sexual partner was at least 6 years older (35.9% compared with 17.0%; adjusted OR 3.34; 95% CI 1.71-6.51), and to report that the index pregnancy was unintended (88.9% compared with 74.9%; adjusted OR 2.57; 95% CI 1.27-5.17). They were less likely to report being raised within a religion (Catholic: 22.8% compared with 33%; adjusted OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.17-0.59; Protestant: 54.6% compared with 51.3%; adjusted OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.27-0.98), living with both biological parents at age 14 years (33.3% compared with 53.4%; adjusted OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.33-0.71), and using contraception at sexual debut (25.3% compared with 56.0%; adjusted OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.18-0.46). CONCLUSION: Understanding risk factors for pregnancy before age 15 years may help clinicians address the social, family planning, and reproductive health needs of this population.

Bringing two worlds together: exploring the integration of traditional midwives as doulas in Mexican public hospitals.

Integrating traditional midwives (TMs) as labor support in cline-based care may be an ideal solution to improving maternity services in the Mexico and worldwide. We conducted interviews and focus groups with 65 TMs and 24 interviews with public health system personnel to assess the acceptability and challenges of this proposal. Both TMs and personnel perceive this new role as having professional benefits. Challenges include TMs' and clinic personnel's previous negative experience with one another and unfamiliarity with the doula role. Interactive trainings introducing the doula role and improving professional relations between TMs and personnel are necessary to assure success of this proposal.

The challenge of pregnancy among homeless youth: reclaiming a lost opportunity.

Young, homeless women often become pregnant, but little is known about how street youth experience their pregnancies. We documented 26 pregnancy outcomes among 13 homeless women (ages 18-26) and eight homeless men through interviews and participant-observation. Eight pregnancies were voluntarily terminated, three were miscarried, and fifteen were carried to term. Regardless of pregnancy outcome, street youths' narratives focused on ambivalence about parenting, traumatic childhood experiences, and current challenges. Despite significant obstacles, almost all were convinced of their personal capacity to change their lives. While most wanted to be parents, the majority lost custody of their newborns and consequently associated contact with medical and social services with punitive outcomes. Most of the youth who chose to terminate successfully sought safe medical care. We offer recommendations for changing the approach of services to take full advantage of pregnancy as a potential catalyst event for change in this highly vulnerable and underserved population.