Funding antiretroviral treatment for HIV-positive temporary residents in Australia prevents transmission and is inexpensive.

Background The aim of this study is to estimate the reduction in new HIV infections and resultant cost outcomes of providing antiretroviral treatment (ART) through Australia's 'universal access' health scheme to all temporary residents with HIV infection living legally in Australia, but currently deemed ineligible to access subsidised ART via this scheme. METHODS: A mathematical model to estimate the number of new HIV infections averted and the associated lifetime costs over 5 years if all HIV-positive temporary residents in Australia had access to ART and subsidised medical care was developed. Input data came from a cohort of 180 HIV-positive temporary residents living in Australia who are receiving free ART donated by pharmaceutical companies for up to 4 years. RESULTS: Expanding ART access to an estimated total 450 HIV+ temporary residents in Australia for 5 years could avert 80 new infections. The model estimated the total median discounted (5%) cost for ART and associated care to be A$36million, while the total savings in lifetime-discounted costs for the new infections averted was A$22million. CONCLUSIONS: It is estimated that expanded access to ART for all HIV-positive temporary residents in Australia will substantially reduce HIV transmission to their sexual partners at little additional cost. In the context of Australia's National HIV strategy and Australia's endorsement of global goals to provide universal access to ART for all people with HIV, this is an important measure to remove inequities in the provision of HIV-related treatment and care.

Centralized assessment of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in multicenter studies of HIV-associated lipodystrophy.

BACKGROUND: The accurate measurement of total body and subcutaneous fat is essential if therapeutic interventions, aimed at preventing or reversing lipodystrophy syndrome, are to be adequately assessed. The aim of this study was to investigate the variability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans analysis performed at local sites compared to central analysis in a multicenter clinical trial. METHOD: The PIILR study was a multicenter randomized clinical trial in which 80 HIV-infected patients with physician-documented lipodystrophy had serial measurements of body composition performed with Lunar DEXA scans. Scans were analyzed at local sites and then were reanalyzed centrally. RESULTS: DEXA scans from 73 patients who completed 24 weeks study were compared. Greater variation in the locally analyzed results than in the centrally reanalyzed data was noted, with arm, leg, and combined limb fat being most divergent between the local and centralized assessments (ratio of local to central standard deviation was 1.28, 1.31, and 1.35, respectively). The magnitude of this variance was enough to alter statistically relevant differences between study populations. CONCLUSION: Quality assurance is an important issue in the use of DEXA scans to determine body fat composition in multicenter research studies. A central quality assurance site should be incorporated to reduce variability in results.