Pediatric priority in kidney allocation after the age of 18 years.

Children registered for kidney transplants prior to the age of 18 years retain "pediatric" allocation status after their 18th birthday. There are no data on the impact of this policy. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 7097 candidates listed for kidney transplant prior to 18 years of age who remained on the waitlist after their 18th birthday between January 1, 2015, and April 1, 2022, using United Network for Organ Sharing data. A total of 1193 candidates remained on the waitlist after their 18th birthday. The median age at listing was 17 years (IQR: 17-17 years). A total of 588 candidates (8% of 7097 pediatric candidates) received a kidney transplant with pediatric status at the age of 18 years or older; 465 (79%) were deceased-donor transplants. The median age at deceased-donor transplants was 18 years (IQR: 18-19 years); 97% were performed before the age of 21 years. In the 7.25 years of the study, 12 adults aged 21 years and older received a deceased-donor kidney transplant with pediatric allocation priority. Deceased-donor transplants with pediatric priority after the age of 18 years are rare, comprising an estimated 0.4% of all adult deceased-donor transplants. Candidates with pediatric priority after 18 years of age typically progress to transplant within 3 years. Ongoing monitoring of this population is important to fully understand the allocation policy.

Equity Concerns Across Pediatric Research Recruitment: An Analysis of Research Staff Interviews.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Difficulty recruiting individuals from minoritized and underserved populations for clinical research is well documented and has health equity implications. Previously, we reported findings from interviews with research staff about pediatric research recruitment processes. Respondents raised equity concerns related to recruitment and enrollment of participants from minoritized, low resourced, and underserved populations. We therefore decided to perform a secondary coding of the transcripts to examine equity-related issues systematically. METHODS: We conducted a process of secondary coding and analysis of interviews with research staff involved in recruitment for pediatric clinical research. Through consensus we identified codes relevant to equity and developed a conceptual framework including 5 stages of research. RESULTS: We analyzed 28 interviews and coded equity-related items. We report 6 implications of our findings. First, inequitable access to clinical care is an upstream barrier to research participation. Second, there is a need to increase research opportunities where underserved and under-represented populations receive care. Third, increasing research team diversity can build trust with patients and families, but teams must ensure adequate support of all research team members. Fourth, issues related to consent processes raise institutional-level opportunities for improvement. Fifth, there are numerous study procedure-related barriers to participation. Sixth, our analysis illustrates that individuals who speak languages other than English face barriers across multiple stages. CONCLUSIONS: Research staff members identified equity-related concerns and recommended potential solutions across 5 stages of the research process, which may guide those endeavoring to improve research recruitment for pediatric patients from minoritized and underserved populations.

Optimising motor development in the hospitalised infant with CHD: factors contributing to early motor challenges and recommendations for assessment and intervention.

BACKGROUND: Neurodevelopmental challenges are the most prevalent comorbidity associated with a diagnosis of critical CHD, and there is a high incidence of gross and fine motor delays noted in early infancy. The frequency of motor delays in hospitalised infants with critical CHD requires close monitoring from developmental therapies (physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech-language pathologists) to optimise motor development. Currently, minimal literature defines developmental therapists' role in caring for infants with critical CHD in intensive or acute care hospital units. PURPOSE: This article describes typical infant motor skill development, how the hospital environment and events surrounding early cardiac surgical interventions impact those skills, and how developmental therapists support motor skill acquisition in infants with critical CHD. Recommendations for healthcare professionals and those who provide medical or developmental support in promotion of optimal motor skill development in hospitalised infants with critical CHD are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Infants with critical CHD requiring neonatal surgical intervention experience interrupted motor skill interactions and developmental trajectories. As part of the interdisciplinary team working in intensive and acute care settings, developmental therapists assess, guide motor intervention, promote optimal motor skill acquisition, and support the infant's overall development.

OPTN/SRTR 2021 Annual Data Report: Lung.

The number of lung transplants has continued to decline since 2020, a period that coincides with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Lung allocation policy continues to undergo considerable change in preparation for adoption of the Composite Allocation Score system in 2023, beginning with multiple adaptations to the calculation of the Lung Allocation Score that occurred in 2021. The number of candidates added to the waiting list increased after a decline in 2020, while waitlist mortality has increased slightly with a decreased number of transplants. Time to transplant continues to improve, with 38.0% of candidates waiting fewer than 90 days for a transplant. Posttransplant survival remains stable, with 85.3% of transplant recipients surviving to 1 year; 67%, to 3 years; and 54.3%, to 5 years.

Assessment and management of feeding difficulties for infants with complex CHD.

Early surgical intervention in infants with complex CHD results in significant disruptions to their respiratory, gastrointestinal, and nervous systems, which are all instrumental to the development of safe and efficient oral feeding skills. Standardised assessments or treatment protocols are not currently available for this unique population, requiring the clinician to rely on knowledge based on neonatal literature. Clinicians need to be skilled at evaluating and analysing these systems to develop an appropriate treatment plan to improve oral feeding skill and safety, while considering post-operative recovery in the infant with complex CHD. Supporting the family to re-establish their parental role during the hospitalisation and upon discharge is critical to reducing parental stress and oral feeding success.

The Impact of Adverse Events on Health Care Resource Utilization, Costs, and Mortality Among Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the association between adverse events (AEs) suspected to be immune-related and health care resource utilization, costs, and mortality among patients receiving programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy for urothelial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, or Merkel cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using medical and pharmacy claims and enrollment information from U.S. commercial and Medicare Advantage with Part D enrollees in the Optum Research Database from March 1, 2014, through April 30, 2019. Claims were linked with mortality data from the Social Security Death Index and the National Death Index. Eligible patients had at least one ICI claim between September 1, 2014, and April 30, 2019. RESULTS: After adjusting for potential confounding variables, we found patients with AEs had more than double the risk of an inpatient stay (hazard ratio [HR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-2.5) and an 80% higher risk of an emergency visit (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.6-2.1) than patients without AEs. Adjusted 6-month total costs were $24,301 higher among patients with an AE versus those without ($99,037 vs. $74,736; 95% CI, $18,828-29,774; p < .001). Mean ± SD AE-related medical costs averaged $2,359 ± $7,496 per patient per month, driven by inpatient visits, which accounted for 89.9% of AE-related costs. Adjusted risk of mortality was similar in patients with and without AEs. CONCLUSION: Patients with AEs had higher risks of hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and higher health care costs, driven by inpatient stays, than patients without AEs. The adjusted risk of mortality was similar between the two cohorts. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Patients taking immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) who had adverse events (AEs) had significantly higher health care costs and utilization, driven by inpatient stays, compared with patients who did not. Given this high cost associated with AEs and the differences in the side effect profile of ICIs versus traditional chemotherapy, it is important for physicians to be cognizant of these differences when treating patients with ICIs. Ongoing evaluation, earlier recognition, and more effective, multidisciplinary management of AEs may improve patient outcomes and reduce the need for costly inpatient stays.

Benefits and risks of protocol biopsies in pediatric renal transplantation.

Protocol biopsies are defined as sampling of allograft tissue at predetermined times regardless of function. This procedure can be justified due to the lack of non-invasive methods to reliably diagnose rejection (acute or subclinical). Changes in creatinine are not seen with subclinical rejection or early acute rejection and do not always correlate with efficacy of treatment. Parents and providers are still hesitant to pursue protocol biopsy due to the potential complications and lack of definitive evidence of a benefit from doing this procedure. Importantly, the rate of transplant renal biopsy complications requiring additional intervention is low. It is unclear if detection and treatment of subclinical rejection detected on protocol biopsy will lead to improved graft survival. Our goal is to review the literature on this topic and share some of the experience in our center. Definition, indications, and complications of diagnostic transplant renal biopsies are not included in this review.

Prospective Assessment of Adenovirus Infection in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Adenovirus infection is associated with graft dysfunction and graft loss in pediatric cardiac, lung, and liver transplants in prior retrospective studies, but data in pediatric kidney transplant recipients is limited. METHODS: We conducted a prospective single-center cohort study of 75 consecutive pediatric kidney transplant recipients who underwent monthly screening for adenovirus viremia and symptom assessment for 2 years posttransplant. RESULTS: Adenovirus viremia was detected in 11 (14.7%) patients at a median onset of 173 days (interquartile range, 109-310 days) posttransplant, 6 (8%) had asymptomatic viremia, and 5 (6.7%) had symptomatic disease (2 with hematuria and 3 with an acute febrile respiratory illness). Viremic patients did not differ from nonviremic patients in age, immunosuppression management, or cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus serostatus, but were more likely to develop cytomegalovirus viremia during the first 2 years posttransplant. No patient had an increase in creatinine from baseline during the time of adenovirus viremia. In a Cox proportional hazards regression, subclinical adenovirus viremia was not associated with a faster time to a 30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate. CONCLUSIONS: Adenovirus infection is common among pediatric kidney transplant recipients and frequently causes symptomatic disease; however, symptoms are often mild and are not associated with a decline in graft function. Routine monitoring for adenovirus viremia in pediatric kidney transplant recipients may not be warranted.

Cost Implications of New National Allocation Policy for Deceased Donor Kidneys in the United States.

BACKGROUND: In December 2014, a new national deceased donor kidney allocation policy was implemented, which allocates kidneys in the top 20% of the kidney donor profile index to candidates in the top 20% of expected survival. We examined the cost implications of this policy change. METHODS: A Markov model was applied to estimate differences in total lifetime cost of care and quality-adjusted life years (QALY). RESULTS: Under the old allocation policy, average lifetime outcomes per listed patient discounted to 2012 US dollars were US $342,799 and 5.42 QALY, yielding US $63,775 per QALY gained. Under the new policy, average lifetime cost was reduced by US $2090 and lifetime QALYs increased by 0.03. Thus, the new policy improved on the old policy by producing more QALYs at lower cost. The present value of total lifetime cost savings from the policy change is estimated to be US $271 million in the first year and US $55 million in subsequent years. The higher transplant rates and allograft survival expected for candidates in the top 20% of expected survival would decrease costs by reducing time on dialysis. Most cost savings are expected to accrue to Medicare, and most increased access to transplant is expected in private payer populations. CONCLUSIONS: The new allocation policy was found to be dominant over the old policy because it increases QALYs at lower cost.

Choosing the order of deceased donor and living donor kidney transplantation in pediatric recipients: a Markov decision process model.

BACKGROUND: Most pediatric kidney transplant recipients eventually require retransplantation, and the most advantageous timing strategy regarding deceased and living donor transplantation in candidates with only 1 living donor remains unclear. METHODS: A patient-oriented Markov decision process model was designed to compare, for a given patient with 1 living donor, living-donor-first followed if necessary by deceased donor retransplantation versus deceased-donor-first followed if necessary by living donor (if still able to donate) or deceased donor (if not) retransplantation. Based on Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, the model was designed to account for waitlist, graft, and patient survival, sensitization, increased risk of graft failure seen during late adolescence, and differential deceased donor waiting times based on pediatric priority allocation policies. Based on national cohort data, the model was also designed to account for aging or disease development, leading to ineligibility of the living donor over time. RESULTS: Given a set of candidate and living donor characteristics, the Markov model provides the expected patient survival over a time horizon of 20 years. For the most highly sensitized patients (panel reactive antibody > 80%), a deceased-donor-first strategy was advantageous, but for all other patients (panel reactive antibody < 80%), a living-donor-first strategy was recommended. CONCLUSIONS: This Markov model illustrates how patients, families, and providers can be provided information and predictions regarding the most advantageous use of deceased donor versus living donor transplantation for pediatric recipients.

Practice patterns and outcomes in retransplantation among pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: More than 25% of pediatric kidney transplants are lost within 7 years, necessitating dialysis or retransplantation. Retransplantation practices and the outcomes of repeat transplantations, particularly among those with early graft loss, are not clear. METHODS: We examined retransplantation practice patterns and outcomes in 14,799 pediatric (ages <18 years) patients between 1987 and 2010. Death-censored graft survival was analyzed using extended Cox models and retransplantation using competing risks regression. RESULTS: After the first graft failure, 50.4% underwent retransplantation and 12.1% died within 5 years; after the second graft failure, 36.1% underwent retransplantation and 15.4% died within 5 years. Prior preemptive transplantation and graft loss after 5 years were associated with increased rates of retransplantation. Graft loss before 5 years, older age, non-Caucasian race, public insurance, and increased panel-reactive antibody were associated with decreased rates of retransplantation. First transplants had lower risk of graft loss compared with second (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.80; P<0.001), third (aHR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49-0.78; P<0.001), and fourth (aHR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.78; P=0.005) transplants. However, among patients receiving two or more transplants (conditioned on having lost a first transplant), second graft median survival was 8.5 years despite a median survival of 4.5 years for the first transplant. Among patients receiving three or more transplants, third graft median survival was 7.7 years despite median survivals of 2.1 and 3.1 years for the first and second transplants. CONCLUSIONS: Among pediatric kidney transplant recipients who experience graft loss, racial and socioeconomic disparities exist with regard to retransplantation, and excellent graft survival can be achieved with retransplantation despite poor survival of previous grafts.

The care transitions intervention: a patient-centered approach to ensuring effective transfers between sites of geriatric care.

During an episode of illness, older patients may receive care in multiple settings; often resulting in fragmented care and poorly-executed care transitions. The negative consequences of fragmented care include duplication of services; inappropriate or conflicting care recommendations, medication errors, patient/caregiver distress, and higher costs of care. Despite the critical need to reduce fragmented care in this population, few interventions have been developed to assist older patients and their family members in making smooth transitions. This article introduces a patient-centered interdisciplinary team intervention designed to improve transitions across sites of geriatric care.