Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nat Commun ; 13(1): 1051, 2022 02 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35217656

RESUMO

Gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT) is marked for elimination of transmission by 2030, but the disease persists in several low-income countries. We couple transmission and health outcomes models to examine the cost-effectiveness of four gHAT elimination strategies in five settings - spanning low- to high-risk - of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Alongside passive screening in fixed health facilities, the strategies include active screening at average or intensified coverage levels, alone or with vector control with a scale-back algorithm when no cases are reported for three consecutive years. In high or moderate-risk settings, costs of gHAT strategies are primarily driven by active screening and, if used, vector control. Due to the cessation of active screening and vector control, most investments (75-80%) are made by 2030 and vector control might be cost-saving while ensuring elimination of transmission. In low-risk settings, costs are driven by passive screening, and minimum-cost strategies consisting of active screening and passive screening lead to elimination of transmission by 2030 with high probability.


Assuntos
Tripanossomíase Africana , Animais , Análise Custo-Benefício , República Democrática do Congo/epidemiologia , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Trypanosoma brucei gambiense , Tripanossomíase Africana/epidemiologia , Tripanossomíase Africana/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA