Exploring the impact of excessive daytime sleepiness caused by obstructive sleep apnea on patient and partner quality of life: a time trade-off utility study in the UK general public.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to quantify the impact of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) on patient and patient's partner health-related quality of life in the form of utility values typically used in health economic evaluations. METHODS: A time trade-off study was conducted in a UK general population sample (representing a societal perspective) to elicit utility values, measured on a 0 to 1 scale, for health states with varying obstructive sleep apnea-associated EDS severity. In a time trade-off study, health states are described, and participants "trade off" time in a specific higher severity state for a shorter amount of time in full health. RESULTS: Overall, the sample consisted of 104 participants, who were interviewed and took part in the time trade-off exercise to elicit utility values for patient and partner residual EDS health states. The average utility score declined with increasing obstructive sleep apnea-associated EDS severity for both patient (no EDS, 0.926; mild EDS, 0.794; moderate EDS, 0.614; severe EDS, 0.546) and partner (no EDS, 0.955; mild EDS, 0.882; moderate EDS, 0.751; severe EDS, 0.670) health states. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the high impact that EDS in obstructive sleep apnea is estimated to have on patient and partner health-related quality of life. CITATION: Tolley K, Noble-Longster J, Mettam S, et al. Exploring the impact of excessive daytime sleepiness caused by obstructive sleep apnea on patient and partner quality of life: a time trade-off utility study in the UK general public. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(9):2237-2246.

How do child and adolescent mental health problems influence public sector costs? Interindividual variations in a nationally representative British sample.

BACKGROUND: Policy and practice guidelines emphasize that responses to children and young people with poor mental health should be tailored to needs, but little is known about the impact on costs. We investigated variations in service-related public sector costs for a nationally representative sample of children in Britain, focusing on the impact of mental health problems. METHODS: Analysis of service uses data and associated costs for 2461 children aged 5-15 from the British Child and Adolescent Mental Health Surveys. Multivariate statistical analyses, including two-part models, examined factors potentially associated with interindividual differences in service use related to emotional or behavioural problems and cost. We categorized service use into primary care, specialist mental health services, frontline education, special education and social care. RESULTS: Marked interindividual variations in utilization and costs were observed. Impairment, reading attainment, child age, gender and ethnicity, maternal age, parental anxiety and depression, social class, family size and functioning were significantly associated with utilization and/or costs. CONCLUSIONS: Unexplained variation in costs could indicate poor targeting, inequality and inefficiency in the way that mental health, education and social care systems respond to emotional and behavioural problems.

Economic impact of childhood psychiatric disorder on public sector services in Britain: estimates from national survey data.

BACKGROUND: Approximately one in ten children aged 5-15 in Britain has a conduct, hyperactivity or emotional disorder. METHODS: The British Child and Adolescent Mental Health Surveys (BCAMHS) identified children aged 5-15 with a psychiatric disorder, and their use of health, education and social care services. Service costs were estimated for each child and weighted to estimate the overall economic impact at national level. RESULTS: Additional health, social care and education costs associated with child psychiatric disorders totalled £1.47bn in 2008. The lion's share of the costs falls to frontline education and special education services. CONCLUSIONS: There are huge costs to the public sector associated with child psychiatric disorder, particularly the education system. There is a pressing need to explore ways to reduce these costs while improving health and well-being.

Health and social care costs for young adults with epilepsy in the UK.

Maintaining contact with services will help improve clinical and social outcomes as children with epilepsy move into their adult lives. This study has collated evidence on the extent to which young adults with epilepsy are supported by health and social care services posttransition, and the costs of such support. UK prevalence and service use data were taken from policy and research literature, as well as national data sets and reports. Costs were attached to these data to arrive at agency and overall total costs. There are approximately 42,000 young adults (18-25 years) with epilepsy costing the UK health and social care budgets 715.3 pound million per annum, on average 17,000 found per young adult with epilepsy. A further 61 pound million falls to the social security budget. Most young adults with epilepsy will rarely use these services, but those with additional health needs have high and often long-term support needs, including supported accommodation and personal care. Current resources used by these young adults are summarised but deficits in service availability can mean long waiting times and sub-optimal treatment. Young adults also want more support to help them take advantage of education and employment opportunities and more information about managing the impacts of epilepsy on their lives. Improving services will cost money, but has the potential to lead to better outcomes for young adults.

Treatment paths and costs for young adults with acquired brain injury in the United Kingdom.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: To identify the health and social care services used by young adults aged 18-25 years with acquired brain injury (ABI) and the costs of these supports. RESEARCH METHODS: A review of existing literature and databases and contact with academics and stakeholders working with people with ABI. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: The likely care pathways of young adults with ABI were mapped over a notional 1-year period after presentation at hospital accident and emergency departments. Most young adults with ABI will use minimal health and social care support following injury but those with subsequent disabilities may cost the health and social care budget in excess of pound47.2 million per year. CONCLUSION: Lack of available data mean the service use and cost estimates draw from a range of sources. However, the costs may under-estimate the true impact on budgets as incidence rates may be higher than identified and conservative values were selected for unit costs. The model estimates the cost of treatment and support as provided today, but high levels of unmet need remain.