Randomised trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of a supraglottic airway device compared with tracheal intubation for in-hospital cardiac arrest (AIRWAYS-3): Protocol, design and implementation.

Survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest is approximately 18%, but for patients who require advanced airway management survival is lower. Those who do survive are often left with significant disability. Traditionally, resuscitation of cardiac arrest patients has included tracheal intubation, however insertion of a supraglottic airway has gained popularity as an alternative approach to advanced airway management. Evidence from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest suggests no significant differences in mortality or morbidity between these two approaches, but there is no randomised evidence for airway management during in-hospital cardiac arrest. The aim of the AIRWAYS-3 randomised trial, described in this protocol paper, is to determine the clinical and cost effectiveness of a supraglottic airway versus tracheal intubation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Patients will be allocated randomly to receive either a supraglottic airway or tracheal intubation as the initial advanced airway management. We will also estimate the relative cost-effectiveness of these two approaches. The primary outcome is functional status, measured using the modified Rankin Scale at hospital discharge or 30 days post-randomisation, whichever occurs first. AIRWAYS-3 presents ethical challenges regarding patient consent and data collection. These include the enrolment of unconscious patients without prior consent in a way that avoids methodological bias. Other complexities include the requirement to randomise patients efficiently during a time-critical cardiac arrest. Many of these challenges are encountered in other emergency care research; we discuss our approaches to addressing them. Trial registration: ISRCTN17720457. Prospectively registered on 29/07/2022.

Risk-adjusted survival for adults following in-hospital cardiac arrest by day of week and time of day: observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Internationally, hospital survival is lower for patients admitted at weekends and at night. Data from the UK National Cardiac Arrest Audit (NCAA) indicate that crude hospital survival was worse after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) at night versus day, and at weekends versus weekdays, despite similar frequency of events. OBJECTIVE: To describe IHCA demographics during three day/time periods-weekday daytime (Monday to Friday, 08:00 to 19:59), weekend daytime (Saturday and Sunday, 08:00 to 19:59) and night-time (Monday to Sunday, 20:00 to 07:59)-and to compare the associated rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) for >20 min (ROSC>20 min) and survival to hospital discharge, adjusted for risk using previously developed NCAA risk models. To consider whether any observed difference could be attributed to differences in the case mix of patients resident in hospital and/or the administered care. METHODS: We performed a prospectively defined analysis of NCAA data from 27 700 patients aged ≥16 years receiving chest compressions and/or defibrillation and attended by a hospital-based resuscitation team in response to a resuscitation (2222) call in 146 UK acute hospitals. RESULTS: Risk-adjusted outcomes (OR (95% CI)) were worse (p<0.001) for both weekend daytime (ROSC>20 min 0.88 (0.81 to 0.95); hospital survival 0.72 (0.64 to 0.80)), and night-time (ROSC>20 min 0.72 (0.68 to 0.76); hospital survival 0.58 (0.54 to 0.63)) compared with weekday daytime. The effects were stronger for non-shockable than shockable rhythms, but there was no significant interaction between day/time of arrest and age, or day/time of arrest and arrest location. While many daytime IHCAs involved procedures, restricting the analyses to IHCAs in medical admissions with an arrest location of ward produced results that are broadly in line with the primary analyses. CONCLUSIONS: IHCAs attended by the hospital-based resuscitation team during nights and weekends have substantially worse outcomes than during weekday daytimes. Organisational or care differences at night and weekends, rather than patient case mix, appear to be responsible.

Regional cardiac resuscitation systems of care.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) is a common public health problem. Regional systems of care have improved provider experience and patient outcomes for those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and life-threatening traumatic injury. We review evidence of the effectiveness of regional cardiac resuscitation systems and describe preliminary recommended elements of such systems. RECENT FINDINGS: There is large and important regional variation in survival among patients treated with OOHCA by emergency medical services, or among patients transported to the hospital after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Most regions lack a well coordinated approach to postcardiac arrest care. There is little evidence to show small increases in transport time or distance have an adverse impact on survival, so bypassing closer hospitals may be feasible. Hospitals that have facilities to provide a comprehensive package of postresuscitation care including percutaneous coronary intervention and therapeutic hypothermia appear to have better survival but further studies are needed. A well defined relationship between increased volume of patients or procedures of individual providers and hospitals and better outcomes has been observed for several clinical disorders and there are suggestions that this may also be true for patients with ROSC after cardiac arrest. SUMMARY: Many more people could survive OOHCA if regional systems of cardiac resuscitation were established. The time has come to implement such systems whenever feasible.

Radiological assessment of the adult chest: implications for chest compressions.

The recommended depth for chest compression during adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is 4-5 cm, and for children one-third the anterior-posterior (AP) chest diameter. A compression depth of one-third of the AP chest diameter has also been suggested for adult CPR. We have assessed chest CT scans to measure what proportion of the adult AP chest diameter is compressed during CPR. Measurements of AP diameter of chest CT scans were taken from the skin anteriorly at the middle of the lower half of the sternum, perpendicularly to the skin on the posterior thorax. The anatomical structure that would be compressed at this level was also noted. One hundred consecutive CT scans were examined (66 males and 34 females). The age (mean +/- S.D.) was 68+/-12 years. AP chest diameter was 253 +/- 27 mm for males and 235 +/- 30 mm for females. The proportion of total AP chest diameter compressed with current compressions is 15.8-19.8% for males and 17.0-21.3% for females. The commonest anatomical structures that would be compressed are the ascending aorta (38%) and the top of the left atrium (36%). There is also a wide anatomical variation in the shape of the adult chest. A chest compression depth of 4-5 cm in adults equates to approximately one-fifth of the AP diameter of the adult chest.