Intracapsular pressures in the flexion-abduction-external rotation and flexion-adduction-internal rotation tests and their comparison with classic hip range of motion: A cadaveric assessment.

Background Flexion-Abduction-External-Rotation and Flexion-Adduction-Internal-Rotation tests are used to reproduce pain at the hip during clinical assessment. As pain can be elicited by high intracapsular pressure, no information has been provided regarding intracapsular pressure during these pain provocative tests. Methods Eight hip joints from four cadaveric specimens (78.5 ± 7.9 years) were assessed using intra-osseous tunnels reaching the lateral and acetabular compartments. To simulate synovial liquid, 2.7 ml of liquid were inserted in both compartments using adaptor injectors. Optic pressure transducers were used to measure pressure variations. Pressures were compared between compartments in each test and between tests for each compartment. Both tests were compared with uniplanar movements. Findings The Flexion-Adduction-Internal-Rotation test showed a significant difference between pressure measured in the lateral (27.17 ± 42.63 mmHg) and acetabular compartment (-26.80 ± 29.26 mmHg) (P < 0.006). The pressure measured in the lateral compartment during the Flexion-Adduction-Internal-Rotation test (27.17 ± 42.63 mmHg) was significantly higher than in the Flexion-Abduction-External-Rotation test (-8.09 ± 15.09 mmHg) (P < 0.010). The pressure measured in the lateral compartment in the Flexion-Abduction-External-Rotation test was significantly lower than during internal rotation (P = 0.011) and extension (P = 0.006). Interpretation High intracapsular pressure is correlated with greater pain at the hip. Clinicians should assess pain with caution during the Flexion-Adduction-Internal-Rotation test as this test showed high intracapsular pressures in the lateral compartment. The Flexion-Abduction-External-Rotation is not influenced by high intra-capsular pressures.

Influence of Standardized Procedures on the Reliability of Hip Clinical Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated a standardized and personalized approach to verify the effects of conditions on intrarater and interrater reliability, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable difference for provocative tests and range-of-motion (ROM) tests used in hip pain assessment: flexion-adduction-internal rotation (FADIR), flexion-abduction-external rotation-extension (FABER), and hip internal rotation with 90° of hip flexion (hip IR). METHODS: Nineteen participants (mean [± SD] age = 24 ± 2 years; 10 women and 9 men) without lower limb or back pain were recruited. Three raters evaluated each participant during 2 testing sessions, 1 day apart. Raters performed the 3 tests in 4 conditions: classic (C), controlled pressure duration (CPD), subject-specific position (SSP), and mixed (M = CPD + SSP). RESULTS: For intrarater reliability, the CPD condition showed the highest intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; mean and 95% confidence interval [CI]) for hip IRROM (0.83; 95% CI, 0.53-0.94) and FADIRROM (0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89). The SSP condition showed the highest ICCs for FABERheight (0.71; 95% CI, 0.42-0.87) and FABERROM (0.62; 95% CI, 0.27-0.83). Concerning interrater reliability, the classic condition presented the highest ICCs for FABER variables (height: 0.54; 95% CI, 0.28-0.76; ROM: 0.58; 95% CI, 0.32-0.79) and hip IR ROM (0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-0.87). The CPD condition showed the highest ICC for FADIRROM (0.57; 95% CI, 0.32-0.78). CONCLUSION: In the conditions of this study, CPD showed the highest ICCs for hip IRROM and FADIRROM, and SSP showed the highest ICCs for FABERheight and FABERROM.

Assessment of Lumbar Spine Height Following Sustained Lumbar Extension Posture: Comparison Between Musculoskeletal Ultrasonography and Stadiometry.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to correlate sitting height measured by stadiometry with lumbar spine height (LSH) modifications measured by musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSU). METHODS: Eighteen healthy young adults were recruited for this study (mean age: 21.5 ± 1.5 years). All subjects were tested in the following sequence: (1) lying supine for 10 minutes, (2) sitting under loaded (9.5 kg) and unloaded conditions for 5 minutes each, (3) lying supine for 15 minutes with passive lumbar extension, and (4) sitting unloaded for 5 minutes. Both stadiometry and MSU measurements were taken after each step of the testing sequence. RESULTS: Following the loaded sitting step, sitting height (measured by stadiometry) decreased by 3.4 ± 1.6 mm, whereas following sustained lumbar extension, sitting height increased by 5.4 ± 3.5 mm (P < .05). Following loaded sitting and sustained lumbar extension, LSH decreased by 3.8 ± 1.7 mm and increased by 6.2 ± 4.1 mm, respectively (P < .05). On the basis of the mean differences (between the different steps of the testing sequence), the mean correlation coefficient and the mean coefficient of determination between stadiometry and MSU measurements were calculated at 0.93 ± 0.07 and 0.88 ± 0.13, respectively, and no statistical differences were observed (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: In vivo measurements of sitting height changes, measured using stadiometry, were strongly correlated with LSH changes, measured using ultrasonography.

2015 Young Investigator Award Winner: Cervical Nerve Root Displacement and Strain During Upper Limb Neural Tension Testing: Part 1: A Minimally Invasive Assessment in Unembalmed Cadavers.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional cadaveric examination of displacement and strain measured at the level of the cervical nerve roots during upper limb neural tension testing (ULNTT) with median nerve bias. OBJECTIVE: To determine the displacement and strain of cervical nerve roots C5-C8 during ULNTT with minimal disruption of surrounding tissues. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical examination of neural pathology involving cervical nerve roots is difficult because of the transient nature of pathologies, such as cervical radiculopathy, entrapment neuropathies, and thoracic outlet syndrome. Cadaveric studies have demonstrated significant displacement and strain in lumbosacral nerve roots during neurodynamic testing of the lower extremity. Examination into the biomechanical behaviors of cervical nerve roots during ULNTT has not been performed. METHODS: Eleven unembalmed cadavers were positioned supine as though undergoing ULNTT. Radiolucent markers were implanted into cervical nerve roots C5-C8. Posteroanterior fluoroscopic images were captured at resting and ULNTT positioning. Images were digitized and displacement and strain were calculated. RESULTS: ULNTT resulted in significant inferolateral displacement (average, 2.16 mm-4.32 mm, P < 0.001) of cervical nerve roots C5-C8. There was a significant difference in inferolateral displacement between the C5 and C6 nerve roots (3.15 mm vs. 4.32 mm, P = 0.009). ULNTT resulted in significant strain (average, 6.80%-11.87%, P < 0.001) of cervical nerve roots C5-C8. There was a significant difference in strain between the C5 and C6 nerve roots (6.60% vs. 11.87%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: ULNTT caused significant inferolateral displacement and strain in cervical nerve roots C5-C8. These results provide the mechanical foundation for the use of ULNTT in clinical evaluation of pathology in the cervical region, such as in cervical radiculopathy, entrapment neuropathies, and thoracic outlet syndrome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.