Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
Mais filtros

País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Nat Rev Rheumatol ; 18(8): 465-479, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35761070

RESUMO

Since the second version of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) treatment recommendations were published in 2015, therapeutic options for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have advanced considerably. This work reviews the literature since the previous recommendations (data published 2013-2020, including conference presentations between 2017 and 2020) and reports high-quality, evidence-based, domain-focused recommendations for medication selection in PsA developed by GRAPPA clinicians and patient research partners. The overarching principles for the management of adults with PsA were updated by consensus. Principles considering biosimilars and tapering of therapy were added, and the research agenda was revised. Literature searches covered treatments for the key domains of PsA: peripheral arthritis, axial disease, enthesitis, dactylitis, and skin and nail psoriasis; additional searches were performed for PsA-related conditions (uveitis and inflammatory bowel disease) and comorbidities. Individual subcommittees used a GRADE-informed approach, taking into account the quality of evidence for therapies, to generate recommendations for each of these domains, which were incorporated into an overall schema. Choice of therapy for an individual should ideally address all disease domains active in that patient, supporting shared decision-making. As safety issues often affect potential therapeutic choices, additional consideration was given to relevant comorbidities. These GRAPPA treatment recommendations provide up-to-date, evidence-based guidance on PsA management for clinicians and people with PsA.


Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica , Medicamentos Biossimilares , Psoríase , Adulto , Artrite Psoriásica/diagnóstico , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Medicamentos Biossimilares/uso terapêutico , Comorbidade , Consenso , Humanos , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico
3.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 21: 201-204, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32199257

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe the process and results of the implementation of a performance-based risk-sharing arrangement for the use of certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), based on rational pharmacotherapy. METHODS: In 2014, the area of Management of Drugs and Supplies of the health maintenance organization of the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires signed a performance-based risk-sharing arrangement with Montpellier Laboratory for the use of certolizumab pegol in patients with RA. The laboratory would reimburse the hospital the cost of the first 10 doses of the drug if an optimal clinical response was not achieved (difference greater than or equal to 1.2 in the Disease Activity Score 28 with erythrocyte sedimentation [Δ DAS28 ESR] measured at the beginning and at the end), or if the patient presented with an adverse drug reaction, during the first 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Forty patients with RA were included between September 2014 and January 2018. Thirty-six patients completed 12 weeks of treatment, of which 25 (69.4 %) had an optimal clinical response (Δ DAS28 ESR ≥ 1.2). The laboratory reimbursed the hospital 116 doses of certolizumab pegol, corresponding to 12 patients (12 of 40, 30%). Eleven of them did not reach the optimal clinical response, and 1 presented with an adverse drug reaction. CONCLUSIONS: The performance-based risk-sharing arrangement proved to be a useful tool to optimize the resources of the healthcare payer and contributed to the collection of scientific evidence in real-life patients.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Certolizumab Pegol/uso terapêutico , Pacientes/psicologia , Participação no Risco Financeiro/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Participação no Risco Financeiro/métodos , Participação no Risco Financeiro/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
Clin Rheumatol ; 38(7): 1935-1940, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30746579

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to estimate incidence and prevalence rates of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) using data from a university hospital-based health management organization (HIMCO) in Latin America. METHODS: Multiple methods for case finding were used to ensure complete ascertainment. GPA was diagnosed if fulfilling ACR 1990 criteria or a clinical diagnosis was made by an experienced rheumatologist. For MPA, a clinical diagnosis made by an experienced rheumatologist in concordance with Chapel Hill 2012 consensus. Renal limited vasculitis (RLV) ANCA-P positive was considered along with MPA. Global, age-specific, and sex-specific incidence and prevalence rates were calculated for members of the HIMCO with continuous affiliation ≥ 1 year from January 2000 to January 2015. Each person was followed up until GPA or MPA were diagnosed, voluntarily withdraw of the HIMCO, death, or study finalization. Prevalence was calculated on January 1, 2015. RESULTS: Nineteen incident cases of GPA and 28 of MPA were identified from January 2000 to January 2015. During this period, a total of 349,775 HIMCO persons contributed a total of 2,073,438 person-years. GPA and MPA overall incidence rate per 1,000,000 person-years were 9 (95% CI 5-13) and 14 (95% CI 9-19), respectively. Age-specific incidence rates in both female and male patients peaked in the seventh decade of life in our population. On January 1, 2015, prevalence rates were 7.4 per 100,000 (95% CI 2.8-12) for GPA and 5.2 per 100,000 (95% CI 1.3-9) for MPA. Prevalence rates were higher in ages over 70 for both genders and both diseases. CONCLUSION: In this first study from Latin America, incidence and prevalence rates were in ranges of previous reports from other sites of the world. In our population, GPA and MPA were more frequent in women and in older ages, and the incidence of MPA was higher than that of GPA. Key points • In Argentina, MPA incidence was higher than GPA, similar to that reported in other parts of the world. • Prevalence and incidence rates were higher in ages over 70 for both sexes and both diseases.


Assuntos
Granulomatose com Poliangiite/epidemiologia , Poliangiite Microscópica/epidemiologia , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Argentina/epidemiologia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Distribuição por Sexo
5.
J Rheumatol ; 46(7): 694-700, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30554153

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) for the detection of sacroiliitis, in patients with inflammatory back pain (IBP). METHODS: Consecutive patients with IBP and suspected axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), but without a definitive diagnosis, were included. Consecutive patients with defined SpA and axial involvement were included as a control group. All patients underwent clinical evaluation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and CDUS of sacroiliac joints (SIJ) within the same week. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the diagnosis of sacroiliitis by CDUS were calculated, using MRI as the gold standard. RESULTS: There were 198 SIJ evaluated in 99 patients (36 with previous SpA). There were 61 men (61.6%), with a mean age of 39.8 years (SD 11.3) and median disease duration of 24 months (IQR 12-84). At the patient level, CDUS had a sensitivity of 63% (95% CI 48.7-75.7%) and a specificity of 89% (95% CI 76-96%). The PPV was 87.2% (95% CI 72.6-95.7%) and the NPV was 66.7% (95% CI 53.3-78.3%). At joint level, CDUS had a sensitivity of 60% (95% CI 49-70%) and a specificity of 93% (95% CI 88-98%). The PPV was 83% (95% CI 78-95%) and the NPV was 43% (95% CI 33-56%). The sensitivity of CDUS for the diagnosis of axial SpA was 54% (95% CI 36.6-71.2%), specificity was 82% (95% CI 63.1-93.9%), PPV was 79% (95% CI 57.8-92.9%), and NPV was 59% (95% CI 42.1-74.4%). CONCLUSION: CDUS showed adequate diagnostic properties for detection of sacroiliitis and is a useful tool in patients with IBP.


Assuntos
Dor Lombar/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação Sacroilíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Sacroileíte/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilite Anquilosante/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia Doppler em Cores/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
6.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 71(12): 1556-1565, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30358135

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The implementation of value-based health care in inflammatory arthritis requires a standardized set of modifiable outcomes and risk-adjustment variables that is feasible to implement worldwide. METHODS: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) assembled a multidisciplinary working group that consisted of 24 experts from 6 continents, including 6 patient representatives, to develop a standard set of outcomes for inflammatory arthritis. The process followed a structured approach, using a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on the following decision areas: conditions covered by the set, outcome domains, outcome measures, and risk-adjustment variables. Consensus in areas 2 to 4 were supported by systematic literature reviews and consultation of experts. RESULTS: The ICHOM Inflammatory Arthritis Standard Set covers patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). We recommend that outcomes regarding pain, fatigue, activity limitations, overall physical and mental health impact, work/school/housework ability and productivity, disease activity, and serious adverse events be collected at least annually. Validated measures for patient-reported outcomes were endorsed and linked to common reporting metrics. Age, sex at birth, education level, smoking status, comorbidities, time since diagnosis, and rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibody lab testing for RA and JIA should be collected as risk-adjustment variables. CONCLUSION: We present the ICHOM inflammatory arthritis Standard Set of outcomes, which enables health care providers to implement the value-based health care framework and compare outcomes that are important to patients with inflammatory arthritis.


Assuntos
Artrite/terapia , Consenso , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Artrite/diagnóstico , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
7.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 23(4): 207-208, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28538275

RESUMO

Health care system in Argentina is highly fragmented and disconnected. Argentina's health system is divided into 3 major nonintegrated subsystems as follows: public subsystem, financed through taxes; the social security subsystem, financed through obligatory insurance schemes; and the private subsystem, financed through voluntary insurance. There are approximately 800 rheumatologists in Argentina, serving a population of approximately 40 million people, representing approximately 1.8 rheumatologists per 100.000 inhabitants; however, most of them are concentrated in large cities, and patients need to travel several hours to reach a specialist. Although the health care system in Argentina is highly fragmented and disconnected, health coverage is universal, accessible, and of good quality. Quality or value assessment of care and use of electronic medical records are not part of the system in Argentina, and there does not appear they would be in the near future.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação das Necessidades , Doenças Reumáticas , Argentina/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Doenças Reumáticas/epidemiologia , Doenças Reumáticas/terapia , Reumatologistas/provisão & distribuição
8.
J Rheumatol ; 43(7): 1306-11, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27084906

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate incidence and prevalence rates of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the city of Buenos Aires (CABA), Argentina, using data from a university hospital-based health management organization. METHODS: Global, age-specific, and sex-specific incidence and prevalence rates were calculated for members of the Hospital Italiano Medical Care Program (HIMCP), age ≥ 18 years. Incidence study followed members with continuous affiliation ≥ 1 year from January 2000 to January 2015 until he/she voluntarily left the HIMCP, RA was diagnosed, death, or study finalization. Cases from the Rheumatology Section database, electronic medical records, laboratory database, and pharmacy database were filtered with the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria. Prevalence was calculated on January 1, 2015, and standardized for CABA. Capture-recapture (C-RC) analysis estimated true population sizes. RESULTS: In the study period, incidence rates (cases per 100,000 person-yrs) were 18.5 (95% CI 16.7-20.4) overall, 25.2 (95% CI 22.4-28.0) for women, and 8.8 (95% CI 6.8-10.8) for men. Prevalence rates (percentage of RA cases in the sample population) were 0.329 (95% CI 0.298-0.359) overall, 0.464 (95% CI 0.417-0.510) for women, and 0.123 (95% CI 0.093-0.152) for men. Standardized CABA prevalence rate was 0.300 (95% CI 0.292-0.307). C-RC adjusted rates were almost the same as unadjusted rates. CONCLUSION: This study's incidence and prevalence rates are in the lower range of the rates found around the world. Our female to male prevalence ratio was 4:1. Our peak incidence age was in the sixth and seventh decades for both sexes.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Argentina/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Adulto Jovem
9.
Arthritis Rheumatol ; 68(5): 1060-71, 2016 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26749174

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To update the 2009 Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) treatment recommendations for the spectrum of manifestations affecting patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: GRAPPA rheumatologists, dermatologists, and PsA patients drafted overarching principles for the management of PsA, based on consensus achieved at face-to-face meetings and via online surveys. We conducted literature reviews regarding treatment for the key domains of PsA (arthritis, spondylitis, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin disease, and nail disease) and convened a new group to identify pertinent comorbidities and their effect on treatment. Finally, we drafted treatment recommendations for each of the clinical manifestations and assessed the level of agreement for the overarching principles and treatment recommendations among GRAPPA members, using an online questionnaire. RESULTS: Six overarching principles had ≥80% agreement among both health care professionals (n = 135) and patient research partners (n = 10). We developed treatment recommendations and a schema incorporating these principles for arthritis, spondylitis, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin disease, nail disease, and comorbidities in the setting of PsA, using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation process. Agreement of >80% was reached for approval of the individual recommendations and the overall schema. CONCLUSION: We present overarching principles and updated treatment recommendations for the key manifestations of PsA, including related comorbidities, based on a literature review and consensus of GRAPPA members (rheumatologists, dermatologists, other health care providers, and patient research partners). Further updates are anticipated as the therapeutic landscape in PsA evolves.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Psoriásica/terapia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Administração Oral , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Ustekinumab/uso terapêutico
10.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 21(8): 435-9, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26513305

RESUMO

The First PANLAR Rheumatology Review Course was held in Barranquilla, Colombia, in April 2015. Researchers, rheumatologists, epidemiologists, and a variety of allied professionals and patients attended the meeting. The scientific program included plenary sessions and symposia delivered by renowned experts in the field, followed by an interactive forum of discussion during 2 days.A broad spectrum of topics was discussed, reflecting the current challenges and opportunities for diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Latin America. The scientific program included not only traditional disease aspects, but also social implications, research projects, and educational characteristics, patient perspectives, and novel care models, emphasizing the need for training human resources and proposing unique approaches to RA health care in Latin America, therefore helping us to increase and improve the knowledge and understanding of the characteristics of this health condition in the region, thus promoting and encouraging equity, quality, and efficiency of RA health care.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide , Atenção à Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Reumatologia , Desenvolvimento de Pessoal , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artrite Reumatoide/terapia , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , América Latina , Melhoria de Qualidade , Reumatologia/educação , Reumatologia/métodos , Fatores Socioeconômicos
11.
Clin Rheumatol ; 34(1): 125-32, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24838482

RESUMO

The objective of this study is to evaluate the responsiveness to therapy change of a global ultrasound (US) assessment in the short-term monitoring of spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients with peripheral involvement. Consecutive SpA patients with both clinical peripheral involvement and active disease (initiating or changing therapy) were included. All patients underwent both clinical and US assessment in day entering the study and after 3 months of follow-up. Peripheral global US assessment included the recognition of abnormal inflammatory findings at joint, tendon, and entheseal level according to standardized scanning methods. A total of 34 patients completed both basal and 3-month follow-up assessments. Acute phase reactants, both erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, tenderness (68) and swollen (66) joint counts, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and Health Assessment Questionnaire decreased significantly at 3-month follow-up. Total score for the global US assessment also decreased significantly between basal and 3-month follow-up assessment [mean difference, 12.33 (IC 95 %, 9.23-15.42); p < 0.0001]. All individual component, joint, tendon, and enthesis scores, also showed a significant decrease during the follow-up period. A high degree of intra-observer reliability was found for the global US assessment (ICC [95 % CI]: 0.977 [0.961-0.993]). This global US assessment, including joints, tendons, and entheses, showed a good responsiveness to clinical changes and might be useful for monitoring SpA patients with peripheral involvement.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Articulações/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilartrite/diagnóstico por imagem , Tendões/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Proteína C-Reativa , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Espondilartrite/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia , Adulto Jovem
12.
Value Health ; 16(2): 385-93, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23538191

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess patients' preferences for rheumatoid-arthritis treatments with biologic agents using a discrete-choice experiment. METHODS: A discrete-choice experiment was conducted with adult rheumatoid-arthritis patients who had never been treated with biological agents from two university hospitals-public and private-in Buenos Aires, Argentina. We evaluated preferences for seven treatment attributes (with two to three levels each): effectiveness, mode of administration, frequency of administration, local and systemic adverse events, severe infections, and out-of-pocket costs.A probit regression model was used to analyze the relative importance of rheumatoid-arthritis treatment attributes. We estimated attributes' relative importance and their 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Survey responses from 240 patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were included in the study. All tested biological agents' attributes significantly affected the choice of treatment. Attributes' relative importance in decreasing order was the following (mean, confidence interval 95%): cost, 0.81 (0.69-0.92); systemic adverse events, 0.66 (0.57-0.76); frequency of administration, 0.61 (0.52-0.71); efficacy, 0.42 (0.32-0.51); route of administration, 0.41 (0.30-0.52); local adverse events, 0.40 (0.31-0.49); and serious infections, 0.29 (0.22-0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Different treatment attributes had a significant and different influence in rheumatoid-arthritis patients' choice of biological agents. This type of study can not only inform about patients' preferences but also about the trade-offs among different possible treatments or process-related attributes.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Preferência do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Antirreumáticos/administração & dosagem , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Antirreumáticos/economia , Argentina , Artrite Reumatoide/psicologia , Produtos Biológicos/administração & dosagem , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Produtos Biológicos/economia , Comportamento de Escolha , Intervalos de Confiança , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Preferência do Paciente/psicologia , Análise de Regressão , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto Jovem
13.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res ; 4: 219-25, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22977308

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to estimate the cost of rheumatoid arthritis and its components in a university hospital-based health management organization in Argentina, during the prebiologic era. METHODS: A one-year (2002) observational prevalence, cost-of illness study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis from the societal perspective was performed in a hospital-based health management organization population. Direct medical costs were obtained using administrative databases. Direct nonmedical and indirect costs were obtained from a semistructured questionnaire. Indirect costs included work absenteeism, permanent work disability, and housework lost for housewives, using the human capital approach. Costs are expressed in 2002 US dollars per patient per year. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients (84% females), of mean age 61 ± 15 years and with a mean disease duration of 8.5 ± 8.3 years were included. Mean total direct medical costs were US$1862 (95% confidence interval [CI] 828-2899). Mean direct nonmedical costs were US$222 (95% CI 149-294). Mean indirect costs were US$1008 (95% CI 606-1412). The annual mean total cost was US$3093 without biologics. Hospitalizations represented 73% of total direct medical costs while drugs and outpatient procedures represented 16% and 8% of total direct medical costs, respectively. Sixty percent of the total costs were related to direct medical costs, while indirect costs represented 33% of total costs. CONCLUSION: In our population, annual mean total costs in the prebiologic therapy era were mainly driven by direct medical costs. Even without the use of biologic agents, rheumatoid arthritis represents an important burden for society in developing countries.

14.
Clin Rheumatol ; 31(9): 1383-7, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22684205

RESUMO

The aim of our study was to investigate by ultrasound (US) the anatomical structures affected during a new episode of bilateral painful shoulder in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare the findings between these two conditions. PMR and RA patients complaining of new onset bilateral painful shoulder were included. Subjects without any known rheumatic condition with a new onset unilateral painful shoulder were assessed as a control group. US evaluation includes the depiction subacromial-subdeltoid (SAD) bursitis, long head biceps (LHB) tenosynovitis and/or gleno-humeral (GH) synovitis. Thirty patients with PMR, 30 with RA, and 60 controls were included for a total of 60 shoulders per group. Unilateral SAD bursitis and LHB tenosynovitis were significantly more frequent in patients with PMR when compared to those with RA (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.01, respectively) and controls (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). Unilateral GH synovitis was more common in RA than in PMR and controls (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). Bilateral SAD bursitis was significantly more frequent in patients with PMR than in those with RA (p < 0.01) as was bilateral LHB tenosynovitis (p < 0.01). No significant differences were found in bilateral GH synovitis. US-detected periarticular inflammatory involvement more frequently in PMR both unilaterally and bilaterally and intra-articular inflammatory involvement was commonly in RA but only unilaterally.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Bursite/diagnóstico por imagem , Polimialgia Reumática/diagnóstico por imagem , Ombro/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Inflamação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/diagnóstico por imagem , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Articulação do Ombro/diagnóstico por imagem , Sinovite/fisiopatologia , Tenossinovite/fisiopatologia
15.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc ; 9(1): 4, 2011 Apr 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21466695

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mounting evidence shows that multi-intervention programmes for hypertension treatment are more effective than an isolated pharmacological strategy. Full economic evaluations of hypertension management programmes are scarce and contain methodological limitations. The aim of the study was to evaluate if a hypertension management programme for elderly patients is cost-effective compared to usual care from the perspective of a third-party payer. METHODS: We built a cost-effectiveness model using published evidence of effectiveness of a comprehensive hypertension programme vs. usual care for patients 65 years or older at a community hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. We explored incremental cost-effectiveness between groups. The model used a life-time framework adopting a third-party payer's perspective. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated in International Dollars per life-year gained. We performed a probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) to explore variable uncertainty. RESULTS: The ICER for the base-case of the "Hypertension Programme" versus the "Usual care" approach was 1,124 International Dollars per life-year gained. PSA did not significantly influence results. The programme had a probability of 43% of being dominant (more effective and less costly) and, overall, 95% chance of being cost-effective. DISCUSSION: Results showed that "Hypertension Programme" had high probabilities of being cost-effective under a wide range of scenarios. This is the first sound cost-effectiveness study to assess a comprehensive hypertension programme versus usual care. This study measures hard outcomes and explores robustness through a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The comprehensive hypertension programme had high probabilities of being cost-effective versus usual care. This study supports the idea that similar programmes could be the preferred strategy in countries and within health care systems where hypertension treatment for elderly patients is a standard practice.

16.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 50(4): 729-34, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21134962

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Studies regarding epidemiology of PsA are lacking in Latin America. We estimated the incidence and prevalence of PsA in a University Hospital-based Health Management Organization in Buenos Aires [Hospital Italiano Medical Care Program (HIMCP)]. POPULATION: for incidence calculation, the population at risk was all adult members of the HIMCP, with continuous affiliation for at least 1 year from January 2000 to January 2006. Each person was followed until he/she voluntarily left the HIMCP, death or finalization of the study (final dates) contributing time at risk since January 2000 or enrolment date (whichever occurred later) to that final date. Case ascertainment: medical records of all patients with the problem psoriasis and/or PsA in the HIMCP problem-oriented computer-based patient record system, or registered in rheumatologists and/or dermatologists databases, were revised. Patients fulfilling CASPAR criteria were included. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: incidence rate (IR) was calculated with 95% CIs. Cumulative prevalence was estimated on 1 January 2006 (denominator population ==88,112). RESULTS: In the study period, 138,288 persons contributed a total of 558,878 person-years, of whom 35 developed PsA (IR 6.26; 95% CI 4.2, 8.3 cases per 100,000 person-years). There were 12 females: IR 3.64 (95% CI 1.6, 5.7) cases per 100,000 person-years; and 23 males: IR 10.02 (95% CI 5.9, 14.1) cases per 100,000 person-years. On 1 January 2006, 65 prevalent cases were identified: prevalence 74 (95% CI 57, 94) cases per 100,000 members. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and prevalence of PsA in this Latin American country was similar to that reported in other studies from Europe and the USA.


Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica/etnologia , Artrite Psoriásica/epidemiologia , Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Argentina/epidemiologia , Artrite Psoriásica/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Classe Social , Adulto Jovem
17.
J Rheumatol ; 34(5): 1167-70, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17477480

RESUMO

A psoriatic arthritis (PsA) module was convened at OMERACT 8 in order to achieve consensus on the core domains that should be included in randomized controlled trials and longitudinal observational cohorts of subjects with PsA. Following a plenary session at which current status of measures used to assess PsA were reviewed, and discussion at breakout groups, the group achieved consensus on 6 core domains: peripheral joint activity, skin activity, pain, patient global assessment, physical function, and health-related quality of life. In addition the following domains were considered important but not mandatory: spinal disease, dactylitis, enthesitis, fatigue, nail disease, radiography, physician global assessment, and acute-phase reactants. A research agenda was proposed to include development and validation of instruments for the domains where none existed, and in particular further research was recommended for the following areas: magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound of joints, enthesitis, skin and synovial tissue analysis, and "participation."


Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica/diagnóstico , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Projetos de Pesquisa , Artrite Psoriásica/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Nexo rev. Hosp. Ital. B.Aires ; 20(1): 3-9, jun. 2000. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-286590

RESUMO

Introducción: entre el 10 y el 25 por ciento de los pacientes de un servicio de salud consumen alrededor del 60 por ciento de sus recursos. Algunas estrategias como la incorporación de un médico de cabecera han logrado disminuir su utilización. Ojetivos: evaluar el efecto de un grupo interdisciplinario de salud en la utilización de recursos por pacientes policonsultadores. Diseño: ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado simple de 6 meses de duración (febrero-julio 1999). Pacientes y métodos: de 65200 pacientes residentes en Capital Federal afiliados al sistema de salud prepago (SP), se seleccionaron los 800 pacientes con mayor número de consultas antre agosto y diciembre de 1998. Fueron aleatorizados en: 400 grupo intervención (GI) (recibieron la intervención), y 400: grupo control (GC). Intervención: contacto por el médico de cabecera (M de C) y una secretaria. Línea telefónica sin cargo para turnos y autorizaciones, visita en domicilio de una enfermera con control telefónico posterior y consultas a una asistente social. Resultados medidos: internaciones, consultas médicas, consumo de fármacos y prácticas. Resultados: los pacientes del GI tuvieron significativamente menor número de internaciones (26 vs. 55; RR: 0,47 IC 95 por ciento: 0,30-0,74) y duración de las mismas (146 vs. 280 días; P<0,05) que el GC y menor número de prácticas [media/ prácticas/ paciente/ mes (DS): GI: 0,43 (0,54); GC: 0,54 (070) p<0,05]. No hubo diferencias significativas en el número de consultas y consumo de fármacos. Conclusiones: un grupo multidisciplinario de salud, en apoyo a los médicos de cabecera, fue de utilidad para disminuir el número y duración de las internaciones y el número de prácticas en un grupo de pacientes policonsultadores en un sistema de salud prepago


Assuntos
Humanos , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde , Visita a Consultório Médico , Recursos em Saúde/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA