Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Diabetes Ther ; 13(4): 775-794, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35297026

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Severe hypoglycemic events (SHE) represent a clinical and economic burden in patients with diabetes. Nasal glucagon (NG) is a novel treatment for SHEs with similar efficacy, but with a usability advantage over injectable glucagon (IG) that may translate to improved economic outcomes. The economic implications of this usability advantage on SHE-related spending in Spain were explored in this analysis. METHODS: A cost-offset and budget impact analysis (BIA) was conducted using a decision tree model, adapted for the Spanish setting. The model calculated average costs per SHE over the SHE treatment pathway following a treatment attempt with IG or NG. Analyses were performed separately in three populations with insulin-treated diabetes: children and adolescents (4-17 years) with type 1 diabetes (T1D), adults with T1D and adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), with respective population estimates applied in BIA. Treatment probabilities were assumed to be equal for IG and NG, except for treatment success following glucagon administration. Epidemiologic and cost data were obtained from Spanish-specific sources. BIA results were presented at a 3-year time horizon. RESULTS: On a per SHE level, NG was associated with lower costs compared to IG (children and adolescents with T1D, EUR 820; adults with T1D, EUR 804; adults with T2D, EUR 725). Lower costs were attributed to reduced costs of professional medical assistance in patients treated with NG. After 3 years, BIA showed that relative to IG, the introduction of NG was projected to reduce SHE-related spending by EUR 1,158,969, EUR 142,162,371, and EUR 6,542,585 in children and adolescents with T1D, adults with T1D, and adults with insulin-treated T2D, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In Spain, the usability advantage of NG over IG translates to potential cost savings per SHE in three populations with insulin-treated diabetes, and the introduction of NG was associated with a lower budget impact versus IG in each group.

2.
Postgrad Med ; 132(8): 727-736, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33108957

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To understand physicians' reasons for prescribing Insulin Lispro 200 units/ml (IL200) and their experience with IL200 treatment in Germany. METHODS: The survey consisted of 28 questions on physician's profile, average IL200 patients' characteristics and rationales for prescribing IL200. Questions were rated on a scale of 0 ('not at all important'/'strongly disagree') to 4 ('absolutely important'/'strongly agree'). RESULTS: The surveyed physicians had a mean (SD) experience of 18.1 (7.0) years managing diabetes, consulted an average of 226.8 patients with diabetes/month and prescribed IL200 to 56.1% of their patients on mealtime insulin (MTI). About 80.0% of IL200 patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus, were overweight/obese, and received >20 units/day of MTI. More than 70.0% of physicians rated patient's insulin dose, pattern of self-measured glucose levels, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (clinical); adherence, hypoglycemia knowledge, motivation to improve lifestyle, desire to reduce injection volume and emotional struggle with controlling HbA1c (behavioral) as 'very important'/'absolutely important' factors when prescribing IL200. CONCLUSION: Physicians considered IL200 a promising treatment option that reduces the injection burden for patients on MTI. Physicians adopted a patient-centered perspective by aligning IL200 prescribing decisions with each patient's medical needs and non-clinical preferences, with an aim to encourage treatment adherence through resorting to IL200's advantageous attributes.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Insulina Lispro/uso terapêutico , Sobrepeso/epidemiologia , Médicos/psicologia , Adulto , Glicemia , Automonitorização da Glicemia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Hipoglicemia/induzido quimicamente , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Insulina Lispro/administração & dosagem , Insulina Lispro/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Motivação , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Período Pós-Prandial , Padrões de Prática Médica
3.
J Med Econ ; 15(3): 409-18, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22208527

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Cost-analysis comparing darbepoetin-alfa (DARB), epoetin-alfa (EPO-A), and epoetin-beta (EPO-B) for treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia in Belgium concluded that costs for DARB-treated patients were significantly lower than costs for EPO-A- or EPO-B-treated patients. The objective of the present study was to extend the Belgian analysis to Austria, France, Italy, Portugal, and Spain, estimating differences in costs between erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in each country. METHODS: Differences in epidemiology and treatment patterns between countries were adjusted using data from Eurostat, national cancer registries, IMS sales data, and reimbursement and treatment guidelines. Belgian unit costs were replaced with country-specific costs. Costs were analyzed using a mixed-effects model stratifying for propensity score quintiles. RESULTS: All populations were comparable to the Belgian population in terms of age, gender, ESA, and blood transfusions use. After adjusting for country-specific chemotherapy use and cancer incidence, total management costs per patient (Euro, 2010) were 19-26% (France, Spain) lower with DARB compared with EPO-A (p < 0.0001) and 20-36% (Portugal, Austria) compared with EPO-B (p < 0.01). Anemia-related costs with DARB were between 12% (Portugal; p = 0.0235) and 38% (Italy; p < 0.0001) lower compared with EPO-A (p < 0.01; all remaining countries), and between 13% (Austria; p = 0.064) and 19% (Portugal; p = 0.0028) lower compared with EPO-B (p < 0.05; all remaining countries except Italy; p = 0.0935). LIMITATIONS: Not all differences could be accounted for by a lack of country-specific data; however, the potential under- and over-estimation of costs should be similar for all three ESAs. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are in line with the Belgian analysis. In all countries, total and anemia-related costs were lowest in patients receiving DARB vs EPO-A or EPO-B. This study demonstrates the feasibility of adapting real-life country-specific data to other settings, adjusting for differences in patients' characteristics and treatment strategies. These findings should be valuable in healthcare decision-making in oncology patients treated in each of the countries studied.


Assuntos
Anemia/induzido quimicamente , Hematínicos/economia , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Anemia/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Bases de Dados Factuais , União Europeia , Feminino , Hematínicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino
4.
Oncologist ; 13(5): 596-607, 2008 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18515745

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are used in chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) with the goal of improving quality of life and preventing RBC transfusions. This retrospective database study compared the three currently available ESAs, epoetin alfa (EPO-A), epoetin beta (EPO-B), and darbepoetin alfa (DARB), regarding costs and outcomes. METHODS: Data were obtained from a Belgian longitudinal database, including medical and financial data on cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and ESAs, submitted by 46 Belgian hospitals. Propensity score matching was applied to correct for selection bias. The main effectiveness parameter was defined as transfusion- and anemia-readmission-free survival (TA-free survival) at 3 months. Costs were analyzed taking the health care payer perspective. RESULTS: Including 1,584 EPO-A, 380 EPO-B, and 429 DARB propensity-matched patients, TA-free survival rates were similar for the three groups (DARB, 84.37%; EPO-A, 84.60%; EPO-B, 84.94%). Overall inpatient costs were euro 16,949 +/- euro 1,025, euro 19,472 +/- euro 901, and euro 19,295 +/- euro 1,048 for DARB, EPO-A, and EPO-B, respectively (DARB versus EPO-A, p < .0001 and DARB versus EPO-B, p = .008). Anemia-associated costs were euro 3,051 +/- euro 218 in the DARB group, compared with euro 3,995 +/- euro144 for EPO-A (p < .0001) and euro 3,752 +/- euro 229 for EPO-B (p = .0132). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first real-life matched retrospective study comparing ESAs with regard to both costs and effects. For similar patient profiles, the patients in the DARB group consumed the smallest amounts of ESAs, with similar clinical outcomes. These data therefore suggest a greater efficiency of DARB in the treatment of CIA.


Assuntos
Anemia/tratamento farmacológico , Eritropoetina/análogos & derivados , Eritropoetina/economia , Hematínicos/economia , Idoso , Anemia/induzido quimicamente , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Bélgica , Darbepoetina alfa , Epoetina alfa , Eritropoetina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hematínicos/administração & dosagem , Hematínicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Proteínas Recombinantes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
J Med Econ ; 11(1): 135-50, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19450115

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infections can lead to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) lesions, cervical cancer (CC) and genital warts (GWs). This study intended to assess the annual cost of CC, CIN and GW management in Belgium. METHOD: A retrospective study using a Belgian Hospital Disease Database (for yearly hospital cost of CC and GW patients) and a clinical expert survey were performed to assess the medical management of CC, CIN and GW patients. Belgian official sources were used to estimate the annual costs of management of CC, CIN and GW patients both from a healthcare payer perspectives (HCPP) and a societal perspective. RESULTS: Based on the 667 patients diagnosed annually in Belgium with CC and an annual cost per patient of euro9,716, the total annual cost of CC is euro6.5 million (HCPP). The 10,495 estimated CIN 1, 2 and 3 patients led to an annual cost of euro1.97 million (HCPP). The 7,989 estimated annual number of diagnosed GW patients led to an estimated annual cost of euro2.53 million (HCPP). CONCLUSION: HPV-related diseases represent an important burden on Belgian society, especially when considering that the estimates in this study are probably underestimations, as the management costs of other HPV-related diseases (vulvar, vaginal, penile, oropharyngeal (pre-) cancers, recurrent respiratory papillomatosis etc.) are not included in this analysis.


Assuntos
Condiloma Acuminado/economia , Condiloma Acuminado/terapia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/economia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/economia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Bélgica/epidemiologia , Condiloma Acuminado/epidemiologia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econométricos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/terapia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA