[SARS-CoV-2 & rheumatic disease : Consequences of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic for patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. A comparison of the recommendations for action of rheumatological societies and risk assessment of different antirheumatic treatments]. / SARS-CoV-2 & Rheuma : Konsequenzen der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie für Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen. Ein Vergleich der Handlungsempfehlungen rheumatologischer Fachgesellschaften und Risikobewertung verschiedener antirheumatischer Therapien.

The recommendations of the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh) update, which update and expand the guidance on the management of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases in view of SARS-CoV­2 created at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, correspond in many points with the recommendations for action of the American (ACR) and European (EULAR) societies, but also differ in some points. Therefore, this article discusses the core recommendations of the DGRh update on the prevention of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19, the risk assessment for inflammatory rheumatic diseases and the use of antirheumatic treatments in the context and in comparison to the ACR and EULAR recommendations, and provides an overview of the risk assessment of individual antirheumatic drugs.

[Amendment of the structural quality for inpatient rheumatology. A forward-looking concept]. / Neufassung der Strukturqualität der akut-stationären Rheumatologie. Ein zukunftsweisendes Projekt.

In 2010 a total of 9 guidelines on structural quality were endorsed by the Association of Rheumatology Clinics in Germany (VRA). These 9 structural criteria replace the regulations published in 2002 and were elaborated with the support of the German Rheumatology League. With guideline number 9 even the structural requirements for university hospitals are defined for the first time.Along with taking part in the quality project "Kobra" (continuous outcome benchmarking in rheumatology inpatient treatment) compliance with the new structural criteria constitutes a prerequisite for acquiring a quality certificate, which is awarded by an external institution.By this means the VRA sets the stage for its members to be prepared for future challenges and quality competition among hospitals. Furthermore, the provision of a high quality treatment for chronically diseased patients in rheumatology clinics will be effectively supported.

Self-assessments of patients via Tablet PC in routine patient care: comparison with standardised paper questionnaires.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the feasibility of electronic data capture of self-administered patient questionnaires using a Tablet PC for integration in routine patient management; we also compared these data with results received from corresponding paper-pencil versions. METHODS: Standardised patient questionnaires (FFbH/HAQ, BASDAI, SF-36) were implemented in our documentation software. 153 outpatients (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, spondyloarthritis) completed sets of questionnaires as paper-pencil and electronic versions using a Tablet PC. The quality and validity of data obtained using a Tablet PC and the capability of disabled patients to handle it were assigned; patients' experiences, preferences and computer/internet use were also assessed. RESULTS: Scores obtained by direct data entry on the Tablet PC did not differ from the scores obtained by the paper-pencil questionnaires in the complete group and disease subgroups. No major difficulties using the Tablet PC occurred. 62.1% preferred remote data entry in the future. Seven (4.6%) patients felt uncomfortable with the Tablet PC due to their rheumatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Self-administered questionnaires via Tablet PC are a facile and capable option in patients with rheumatic diseases to monitor disease activity, efficacy and safety assessments continuously. Tablet PC applications offers directly available data for clinical decision-making improves quality of care by effective patient monitoring, and contributes to patients' empowerment.

Health care and burden of illness in systemic lupus erythematosus compared to rheumatoid arthritis: results from the National Database of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centres.

During the past 20 years, outcome studies in the rheumatic diseases have, on the one hand, given increasing evidence of the unfavourable long-term prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and on the other hand determined continuous improvement of prognosis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The aim of the study was to investigate how this translates into the current spectrum of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) seen by rheumatologists in Germany and to compare aspects of the burden of disease, disease outcomes and treatment between these two important rheumatic diseases using a large clinical database. Current health care was analysed with data from the German rheumatological database of 10 068 patients with RA and 1248 patients with SLE seen by rheumatologists in 2001. In addition, of a total of 3546 patients with SLE and 24 969 patients with RA seen at the German Collaborative Arthritis Centres between 1994 and 2001, 3465 cases of SLE were matched by age, sex, disease duration and referral status with a corresponding RA case. There were considerable differences in treatment of patients before referral to a rheumatologist and in rheumatologic care. In 2001, patients with SLE were treated by their rheumatologists mainly with antimalarials (AM, 37%), azathioprine (29%) and nonselective NSAIDs (16%). Of them, 61% received at least one immunosuppressive drug (including AM) plus glucocorticoids. In RA, methotrexate was the predominant medication (63%), and 56% received at least one immunosuppressive drug plus glucocorticoids. Matched pairs analysis showed that SLE patients with a short disease duration were almost equally burdened by pain, functional limitations and reduced health status as RA patients. After a disease duration of >10 years, however, patients with RA showed poorer outcomes than those with SLE: RA patients reported significantly more often severe pain (30% in RA versus 17% in SLE) and poor global health status (52 versus 38%), and their disease activity as well as severity was rated higher by the rheumatologists. In conclusion, comparing large groups of RA and SLE patients we found a similar burden in early but not in late disease. Taking into account limitations as to the generalizability of the results (recruitment in rheumatologic care, cross-sectional data, underestimation of SLE-specific outcomes), the discrepancy between the high increase in disease-related negative outcomes with longer disease duration in RA but not in SLE indicates a better long-term prognosis in SLE concerning the items observed. The great disparity in treatment intensity between rheumatologists and nonrheumatologists shows that the involvement of a specialist is needed equally in both diseases.