Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
BMC Surg ; 21(1): 69, 2021 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33522909

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Elective implant removal (IR) after fracture fixation is one of the most common procedures within (orthopedic) trauma surgery. The rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) in this procedure is quite high, especially below the level of the knee. Antibiotic prophylaxis is not routinely prescribed, even though it has proved to lower SSI rates in other (orthopedic) trauma surgical procedures. The primary objective is to study the effectiveness of a single intravenous dose of 2 g of cefazolin on SSIs after IR following fixation of foot, ankle and/or lower leg fractures. METHODS: This is a multicenter, double-blind placebo controlled trial with a superiority design, including adult patients undergoing elective implant removal after fixation of a fracture of foot, ankle, lower leg or patella. Exclusion criteria are: an active infection, current antibiotic treatment, or a medical condition contraindicating prophylaxis with cefazolin including allergy. Patients are randomized to receive a single preoperative intravenous dose of either 2 g of cefazolin or a placebo (NaCl). The primary analysis will be an intention-to-treat comparison of the proportion of patients with a SSI at 90 days after IR in both groups. DISCUSSION: If 2 g of prophylactic cefazolin proves to be both effective and cost-effective in preventing SSI, this would have implications for current guidelines. Combined with the high infection rate of IR which previous studies have shown, it would be sufficiently substantiated for guidelines to suggest protocolled use of prophylactic antibiotics in IR of foot, ankle, lower leg or patella. Trial registration Nederlands Trial Register (NTR): NL8284, registered on 9th of January 2020, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/8284.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Ossos da Extremidade Inferior/cirurgia , Cefazolina , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Adulto , Tornozelo , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/economia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/economia , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Ossos da Extremidade Inferior/lesões , Cefazolina/administração & dosagem , Cefazolina/economia , Cefazolina/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Remoção de Dispositivo/economia , Método Duplo-Cego , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/economia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Perna (Membro) , Extremidade Inferior , Patela , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 17(1): 53, 2017 01 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28068924

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Urinary and (peripheral and central) intravenous catheters are widely used in hospitalized patients. However, up to 56% of the catheters do not have an appropriate indication and some serious complications with the use of these catheters can occur. The main objective of our quality improvement project is to reduce the use of catheters without an appropriate indication by 25-50%, and to evaluate the affecting factors of our de-implementation strategy. METHODS: In a multicenter, prospective interrupted time series analysis, several interventions to avoid inappropriate use of catheters will be conducted in seven hospitals in the Netherlands. Firstly, we will define a list of appropriate indications for urinary and (peripheral and central) intravenous catheters, which will restrict the use of catheters and urge catheter removal when the indication is no longer appropriate. Secondly, after the baseline measurements, the intervention will take place, which consists of a kick-off meeting, including a competitive feedback report of the baseline measurements, and education of healthcare workers and patients. Additional strategies based on the baseline data and local conditions are optional. The primary endpoint is the percentage of catheters with an inappropriate indication on the day of data collection before and after the de-implementation strategy. Secondary endpoints are catheter-related infections or other complications, catheter re-insertion rate, length of hospital (and ICU) stay and mortality. In addition, the cost-effectiveness of the de-implementation strategy will be calculated. DISCUSSION: This study aims to reduce the use of urinary and intravenous catheters with an inappropriate indication, and as a result reduce the catheter-related complications. If (cost-) effective it provides a tool for a nationwide approach to reduce catheter-related infections and other complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial registry: NTR6015 . Registered 9 August 2016.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Periférico/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateteres de Demora/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Urinário/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateteres Urinários/virologia , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle , Bacteriemia/economia , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/economia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Masculino , Países Baixos , Estudos Prospectivos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Procedimentos Desnecessários , Cateterismo Urinário/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Urinários/efeitos adversos , Infecções Urinárias/economia , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA