RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The use of regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma patients has been recently approved by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) and added to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 2020 guidelines as a preferred regimen. Given its complex effects at the molecular level, the most appropriate imaging tools to assess early response to treatment is still a matter of debate. Diffusion-weighted imaging and O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography ([18F]FET PET) are promising methodologies providing additional information to the currently used RANO criteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate the variations in diffusion-weighted imaging/apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and [18F]FET PET-derived parameters in patients who underwent PET/MR at both baseline and after starting regorafenib. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 16 consecutive GBM patients who underwent [18F]FET PET/MR before and after two cycles of regorafenib. Patients were sorted into stable (SD) or progressive disease (PD) categories in accordance with RANO criteria. We were also able to analyze four SD patients who underwent a third PET/MR after another four cycles of regorafenib. [18F]FET uptake greater than 1.6 times the mean background activity was used to define an area to be superimposed on an ADC map at baseline and after treatment. Several metrics were then derived and compared. Log-rank test was applied for overall survival analysis. RESULTS: Percentage difference in FET volumes correlates with the corresponding percentage difference in ADC (R = 0.54). Patients with a twofold increase in FET after regorafenib showed a significantly higher increase in ADC pathological volume than the remaining subjects (p = 0.0023). Kaplan-Meier analysis, performed to compare the performance in overall survival prediction, revealed that the percentage variations of FET- and ADC-derived metrics performed at least as well as RANO criteria (p = 0.02, p = 0.024 and p = 0.04 respectively) and in some cases even better. TBR Max and TBR mean are not able to accurately predict overall survival. CONCLUSION: In recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with regorafenib, [18F]FET and ADC metrics, are able to predict overall survival and being obtained from completely different measures as compared to RANO, could serve as semi-quantitative independent biomarkers of response to treatment. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Simultaneous evaluation of [18F]FET and ADC metrics using PET/MR allows an early and reliable identification of response to treatment and predict overall survival.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Glioblastoma/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Feminino , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/métodos , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) and standard uptake values (SUV) of pediatric sarcomas at staging by using volumetric histograms analyses. METHODS: Children with histologically proven sarcoma, referring to our tertiary center for a whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI for staging and including diffusion weighted imaging in the MRI protocol were investigated. Firstly, turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) and PET images were resliced and resampled according to the ADC maps. Regions of interests were drawn along tumor margins on TIRM images and then copied on PET and ADC datasets. Pixel-based SUVs and ADCs were collected from the entire volume of each lesion. Mean, median, skewness, and kurtosis of SUVs and ADCs values were computed, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was then applied (for the entire population and for histological subgroups with more than five patients). RESULTS: Thirteen patients met the inclusion criteria (six females; mean age 8.31 ± 6.03 years). Histology revealed nine rhabdomyosarcomas, three Ewing sarcomas, and one chondroblastic osteosarcoma. A significant negative correlation between ADCs' and SUVs' mean (rmean = - 0.501, P < 0.001), median (rmedian = - 0.519, P < 0,001), and skewness (rskewness = - 0.550, P < 0.001) emerged for the entire population and for rhabdomyosarcomas (rmean = - 0.541, P = 0.001, rmedian = - 0.597, P < 0.001, rskewness = - 0.568, P < 0.001), whereas a significant positive correlation was found for kurtosis (rkurtosis = 0.346, P < 0.001, and rkurtosis = 0.348, P < 0.001 for the entire population and for rhabdomyosarcomas, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results demonstrate that, using volumetric histograms, simultaneously collected SUVs and ADCs are dependent biomarkers in pediatric FDG-avid sarcomas. Further studies, on a larger population, are necessary to confirm this evidence and assess its clinical implications.