Changes in nose symmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by differing pre-surgical assistance: An objective assessment of primary repair.

BACKGROUND: Residual deformity of the nose, not lip, continues to be the greater challenge in UCCLP rehabilitation. Platform distortions often re-emerge following primary reconstruction revealing the stereotypical cleft-nose. Nasal alveolar molding reduces nose asymmetry. However, this study applies directional mechanics to the underlying platform distortions and soft tissue nose, introducing a novel device addressing the distorted septo-premaxillary junction. METHODS: Retrospective assessment of 47 UCCLP patients by 2-dimensional photographic analysis with 24 subjects treated by dento-maxillary advancement (DMA) and nasal septum button-head pin (NSBP), 17 having nasal molding (NM), compared to 23 subjects without nose treatment, 16 with DMA and 7 with passive plates. Measurements were assessed by t tests, ≤ 05 confidence. RESULTS: Frontal view: nose-treatment sample achieved ideal ala-bases vertical symmetry (p = 0.00065 & 0.00073); significantly improved ala-rims "slump" angle (p = 0.0071). Both samples had nose positioning within the facial frame like non-cleft population. Sub-nasal view: significant differences were for columella angle (p = 0.0015), nares "offset" (p = 0.002), and columella symmetry (p = 0.022) with nose-treatment achieving near ideal columella symmetry score (0.92) vs. (0.81). CONCLUSIONS: NM and the novel NSBP procedures integrated with the platform correction effect of the DMA successfully treated at three distorted anatomic-levels native to UCCLP to improve nasal aesthetics.

Assessment of cleft lip and palate patients treated with presurgical orthopedic correction and either primary bone grafts, gingivoperiosteoplasty, or without alveolar grafting procedures.

The effects of alveolar grafting on the development of the craniofacial complex have been reported by numerous investigators. The reported results vary in the literature from significant to very little impediment of maxillary growth. The present work evaluates and compares facial form at age six years in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients treated with presurgical orthopedic correction and primary reconstruction with (1) primary bone grafts (n = 14), (2) gingivoperiosteoplasty (n = II), or (3) without alveolar grafting procedures at the time of lip repair (n = 13). The cohort groups were analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOV A). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the three groups for only one of the 12 parameters analyzed. The primary bone grafted group demonstrated less vertical descent-of the anterior maxilla compared to the gingivoperiosteoplasty and non-grafted groups (P = .0027).