Smarca2 genetic ablation is phenotypically benign in a safety assessment of tamoxifen-inducible conditional knockout rats.

SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 are the ATPases of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, which play a significant role in regulating transcriptional activity and DNA repair in cells. SMARCA2 has become an appealing synthetic-lethal, therapeutic target in oncology, as mutational loss of SMARCA4 in many cancers leads to a functional dependency on residual SMARCA2 activity. Thus, for therapeutic development, an important step is understanding any potential safety target-associated liabilities of SMARCA2 inhibition. To best mimic a SMARCA2 therapeutic, a tamoxifen-inducible (TAMi) conditional knockout (cKO) rat was developed using CRISPR technology to understand the safety profile of Smarca2 genetic ablation in a model system that avoids potential juvenile and developmental phenotypes. As the rat is the prototypical rodent species utilized in toxicology studies, a comprehensive toxicological and pathological assessment was conducted in both heterozygote and homozygous knockout rats at timepoints up to 28 days, alongside relevant corresponding controls. To our knowledge, this represents the first TAMi cKO rat model utilized for safety assessment evaluations. No significant target-associated phenotypes were observed when Smarca2 was ablated in mature (11- to 15-week-old) rats; however subsequent induction of SMARCA4 was evident that could indicate potential compensatory activity. Similar to mouse models, rat CreERT2-transgene and TAMi toxicities were characterized to avoid confounding study interpretation. In summary, a lack of significant safety findings in Smarca2 cKO rats highlights the potential for therapeutics targeting selective SMARCA2 ATPase activity; such therapies are predicted to be tolerated in patients without eliciting significant on-target toxicities.

Assessment of possible carcinogenicity of oxyfluorfen to humans using mode of action analysis of rodent liver effects.

Oxyfluorfen is a herbicide that is not genotoxic and produces liver toxicity in rodents, following repeated administration at high dose levels. Lifetime rodent feeding studies reported in 1977 with low-purity oxyfluorfen (85%) showed no increase in any tumor type in rats (800 ppm, high dose) and only a marginally increased incidence of hepatocellular tumors in male CD-1 mice at the highest dose (200 ppm). To evaluate the potential carcinogenicity of the currently registered oxyfluorfen (> 98% purity), we conducted a series of short-term liver mode of action (MOA) toxicology studies in male CD-1 mice administered dietary doses of 0, 40, 200, 800, and 1600 ppm for durations of 3, 7, 10, or 28 days. MOA endpoints examined included liver weight, histopathology, cell proliferation, nuclear receptor-mediated gene expression, and other peroxisome proliferator-specific endpoints and their reversibility. Minimal liver effects were observed in mice administered doses at or below 200 ppm for up to 28 days. Increased liver weight, single-cell necrosis, cell proliferation, and peroxisomal acyl-CoA oxidase (ACO) were observed at 800 ppm after 28 days, but there was no increase in peroxisomes. Expression of Cyp2b10 and Cyp4a10 transcripts, markers of constitutive androstane receptor and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor α nuclear receptor activation, respectively, were increased at 800 and 1600 ppm after 3 or 10 days. Collectively, these data along with the negative genotoxicity demonstrate that oxyfluorfen (> 98% purity) has the potential to induce mouse liver tumors through a nongenotoxic, mitogenic MOA with a clear threshold and is not predicted to be carcinogenic in humans at relevant exposure levels.

Heat stability, its measurement, and its lack of utility in the assessment of the potential allergenicity of novel proteins.

Thermal stability has been reported as a shared characteristic among some of the major food allergens and appears to have originated from the observation that some cooked foods retain their ability to cause allergic reactions by Immunoglobulin E (IgE) binding and the subsequent cascade of events that mediate allergic reactions. Based on this observation, the thermal stability of novel food proteins, like those in transgenic crops, is considered correlative with allergenic risk and has prompted requests from some regulatory agencies for additional testing to address safety concerns. Because human testing and serum IgE screening are not feasible nor are they necessarily useful for evaluating the thermal stability of a novel food protein, a protein function assay is often used to assess the thermal stability in the context of an allergenicity risk assessment. Some regulatory authorities also require immunodetection using polyclonal IgG antibodies and gel based methods. Here we review why heat stability as measured by these functional and immunodetection assays does not correlate with allergenicity and provides no useful safety information in assessing the allergenic potential of novel food proteins.