Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Ann Ig ; 17(5): 413-8, 2005.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16353678

RESUMO

This study describes the results of a retrospective study carried out to evaluate the hospitalizations of patients with type 2 diabetes admitted from January to June 2001 in the teaching hospital "SS. Annunziata" of Chieti. This research evaluates the generic appropriateness using the PRUO manual and the specific appropriateness using the guidelines approved by Italian Diabetes Association, Italian Diabetes Society and Italian College of General Practitioners. A sample of 196 medical charts was examined. The percentage of inappropriate admission was 21.9%. The "critical" clinical conditions of patients were responsible for only 23.7% of inappropriate admissions. The first reason of the inappropriateness of the admission was the execution of diagnostic examinations (60.5%), followed by the execution of medical therapy (23.2%) and waiting for surgical intervention (16.3%). 46.5% of inappropriate hospitalization was prescribed by specialists. Concerning specific appropriateness, 42.3% of hospitalization was inappropriate. These findings suggest that a system for the assessment of disease management of diabetes should be started up in the Abruzzo region. Moreover, guidelines utilization should be implemented in order to get a more correct utilization of acute hospital by specialists and GPs.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/classificação , Feminino , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Itália , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão do Paciente , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais
2.
Chemotherapy ; 50(2): 81-7, 2004 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15211082

RESUMO

A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial was conducted on 124 febrile patients with hematological malignancies to compare teicoplanin with vancomycin as an addition to the initial empiric amikacin-ceftazidime regimen after documented bacteremia due to gram-positive cocci. At enrollment, patients in both groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, underlying hematologic disorders and duration of neutropenia. Rates of therapeutic success were 55/63 (87.3%) in the teicoplanin group and 56/61 (91.8%) in the vancomycin group (p = 0.560). The mean duration of treatment was similar, being 12.2 and 11.4 days, respectively (p = 0.216). Patients treated with teicoplanin remained febrile for slightly longer than those treated with vancomycin (4.9 vs. 4.0 days) (p = 0.013). Thirteen patients experienced an adverse drug reaction, but without any significant difference in the two arms. Isolated staphylococci showed a progressive and significant decrease in susceptibility to both glycopeptides during the 8 study years. The economic analysis performed showed that the addition of vancomycin is cost-saving.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapêutico , Cocos Gram-Positivos/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neutropenia/tratamento farmacológico , Teicoplanina/uso terapêutico , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Redução de Custos , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada/economia , Feminino , Febre/etiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutropenia/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Teicoplanina/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vancomicina/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA