Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 15(9): e011756, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36126131

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In some patients, the alternative access route for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is utilized because the conventional transfemoral approach is not felt to be either feasible or optimal. However, accurate prognostication of patient risks is not well established. This study examines the associations between peripheral (transsubclavian/transaxillary, and transcarotid) versus central access (transapical and transaortic) in alternative access TAVR and 30-day and 1-year end points of mortality and stroke for all valve platforms. METHODS: Using data from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry with linkage to Medicare claims, patients who underwent alternative access TAVR from June 1, 2015 to June 30, 2018 were identified. Adjusted and unadjusted Cox proportional hazards modeling were performed to determine the association between alternate access TAVR site and 30-day and 1-year end points of mortality and stroke. RESULTS: Of 7187 alternative access TAVR patients, 3725 (52%) had peripheral access and 3462 (48%) had central access. All-cause mortality was significantly lower in peripheral access versus central access group at in-hospital and 1 year (2.9% versus 6.3% and 20.3% versus 26.6%, respectively), but stroke rates were higher (5.0% versus 2.8% and 7.3% versus 5.5%, respectively; all P<0.001). These results persisted after 1-year adjustment (death adjusted hazard ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.62-0.85] and stroke adjusted hazard ratio, 2.92 [95% CI, 2.21-3.85]). When broken down by individual subtypes, compared with transaxillary/subclavian access patients, transapical, and transaortic access patients had higher all-cause mortality but less stroke (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world, contemporary, nationally representative benchmarking study of alternate access TAVR sites, peripheral access was associated with favorable mortality and morbidity outcomes compared with central access, at the expense of higher stroke. These findings may allow for accurate prognostication of risk for patient counseling and decision-making for the heart team with regard to alternative access TAVR.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Cardiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Cirurgiões , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Idoso , Humanos , Medicare , Sistema de Registros , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
2.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 14(11): e009374, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34784236

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Women have a higher rate of adverse events after mitral valve surgery. We sought to evaluate whether outcomes after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair intervention by sex have similar trends to mitral valve surgery. METHODS: The primary outcome was 1-year major adverse events defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, and any bleeding in the overall study cohort. Patients who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for mitral regurgitation with the MitraClip system in the Society of Thoracic Surgery/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy registry were evaluated. Linked administrative claims from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were used to evaluate 1-year clinical outcomes. Associations between sex and outcomes were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model for in-hospital outcomes and Cox model for 1-year outcomes. RESULTS: From November 2013 to March 2017, 5295 patients, 47.6% (n=2523) of whom were female, underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. Females were less likely to have >1 clip implanted (P<0.001) and had a lower adjusted odds ratio of device success (adjusted odds ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67-0.90]), driven by lower odds of residual mitral gradient <5 mm Hg (adjusted odds ratio, 0.54 [CI, 0.46-0.63]) when compared with males. At 1-year follow-up, the primary outcome did not differ by sex. Female sex was associated with lower adjusted 1-year risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.80 [CI, 0.68-0.94]), but the adjusted 1-year risk of stroke and any bleeding did not differ by sex. CONCLUSIONS: No difference in composite outcome of all-cause mortality, stroke, and any bleeding was observed between females and males. Adjusted 1-year all-cause mortality was lower in females compared with males.


Assuntos
Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral , Idoso , Feminino , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/epidemiologia , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Sistema de Registros , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 13(12): e006878, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33280434

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have demonstrated health status benefit of transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) with MitraClip in patients with mitral valve regurgitation. Real-world site-level variability in health status outcomes for TMVr, and factors associated with this variability, are unknown. METHODS: All patients undergoing TMVr procedure with MitraClip between November 2013 and March 2019 in the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry were included. Health status was measured at baseline and 30 days with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary (OS) score. Site-level variability in 30-day change in KCCQ-OS was examined by calculating the median odds ratio from a hierarchical logistic regression model, with ≥20-point improvement as the dependent variable. To define the extent to which patient characteristics, procedural characteristics (residual mitral valve regurgitation, periprocedural bleeding), site volume, and patients' baseline health status accounted for variability in outcomes, the proportion of variability (R2) explained by sequentially adding these variables to the model was quantified. RESULTS: Across 339 sites, 12 415 patients (mean age 79.0±9.5 years, 46.1%. females, 89.5% White) completed baseline and 30-day health status assessments. Mean KCCQ-OS score was 43.0±24.4 at baseline and 67.0±24.9 at 30-day follow-up. Across sites, the proportion of patients achieving a ≥20-point improvement in KCCQ-OS ranged from 12.5% to 100% and the adjusted median odds ratio was 1.58 (95% CI, 1.46-1.69). The greatest contribution to the variability in health status outcomes was from patients' baseline KCCQ-OS score (R2=25%) with <1% of the variability explained by patient and procedural characteristics, and annual site volume. CONCLUSIONS: There is moderate variation across sites in their patients' achievement of health status benefits from TMVr, with patient's baseline health status accounting for the largest proportion of this variation. This underscores the importance of patient selection in supporting more consistent health status benefit from TMVr.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentação , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/instrumentação , Humanos , Masculino , Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Mitral/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/fisiopatologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
4.
Circ Heart Fail ; 13(4): e006134, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32268795

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Palliative care improves quality of life in patients with heart failure. Whether men and women with heart failure derive similar benefit from palliative care interventions remains unknown. METHODS: In a secondary analysis of the PAL-HF trial (Palliative Care in Heart Failure), we analyzed differences in quality of life among men and women with heart failure and assessed for differential effects of the palliative care intervention by sex. Differences in clinical characteristics and quality-of-life metrics were compared between men and women at serial time points. The primary outcome was change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score between baseline and 24 weeks. RESULTS: Among the 71 women and 79 men, there was a significant difference in baseline Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (24.5 versus 36.2, respectively; P=0.04) but not Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care scale (115.7 versus 120.3; P=0.27) scores. Among those who received the palliative care intervention (33 women and 42 men), women's quality-of-life score remained lower than that of men after enrollment. Treated men's scores were significantly higher than those untreated (6-month Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, 68.0 [interquartile range, 52.6-85.7] versus 41.1[interquartile range, 32.0-78.3]; P=0.047), whereas the difference between treated and untreated women was not significantly different (P=0.39). Rates of death and rehospitalization, as well as the composite end point, were similar between treated and untreated women and men. CONCLUSIONS: In the PAL-HF trial, women with heart failure experienced a greater symptom burden and poorer quality of life as compared with men. The change in treated men's Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score between baseline and 24 weeks was significantly higher than those untreated; this trend was not observed in women. Thus, there may be a sex disparity in response to palliative care intervention, suggesting that sex-specific approaches to palliative care may be needed to improve outcomes. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT0158960.


Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 11(6): 581-589, 2018 03 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29566805

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a risk adjustment model for 30-day mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) that accounted for both standard clinical factors and pre-procedural health status and frailty. BACKGROUND: Assessment of risk for TAVR is important both for patient selection and provider comparisons. Prior efforts for risk adjustment have focused on in-hospital mortality, which is easily obtainable but can be biased because of early discharge of ill patients. METHODS: Using data from patients who underwent TAVR as part of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry (June 2013 to May 2016), a hierarchical logistic regression model to estimate risk for 30-day mortality after TAVR based only on pre-procedural factors and access site was developed and internally validated. The model included factors from the original TVT Registry in-hospital mortality model but added the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (health status) and gait speed (5-m walk test). RESULTS: Among 21,661 TAVR patients at 188 sites, 1,025 (4.7%) died within 30 days. Independent predictors of 30-day death included older age, low body weight, worse renal function, peripheral artery disease, home oxygen, prior myocardial infarction, left main coronary artery disease, tricuspid regurgitation, nonfemoral access, worse baseline health status, and inability to walk. The predicted 30-day mortality risk ranged from 1.1% (lowest decile of risk) to 13.8% (highest decile of risk). The model was able to stratify risk on the basis of patient factors with good discrimination (C = 0.71 [derivation], C = 0.70 [split-sample validation]) and excellent calibration, both overall and in key patient subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: A clinical risk model was developed for 30-day death after TAVR that included clinical data as well as health status and frailty. This model will facilitate tracking outcomes over time as TAVR expands to lower risk patients and to less experienced sites and will allow an objective comparison of short-term mortality rates across centers.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Nível de Saúde , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cardiomiopatias/diagnóstico , Cardiomiopatias/mortalidade , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Feminino , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Fragilidade/mortalidade , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Aptidão Física , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sistema de Registros , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Sociedades Médicas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Teste de Caminhada , Velocidade de Caminhada
6.
Am Heart J ; 166(5): 913-9, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24176448

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is frequently measured during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, little is known of this measurement's utility in predicting outcomes or informing treatment decisions. We sought to determine the prognostic value of LVEDP measured during primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: We studied 1,909 (33.2%) of 5,745 STEMI patients in whom LVEDP was measured during primary PCI in the APEX-AMI trial. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate whether LVEDP was an independent predictor of mortality and the composite of death, cardiogenic shock, or congestive heart failure (CHF) at 90 days. RESULTS: The median (25th, 75th percentiles) LVEDP level was 22 mm Hg (16, 29); compared with patients with LVEDP ≤ 22 mm Hg, those with LVEDP > 22 mm Hg had higher rates of CHF (7.3% vs 3.1%, P < .001), cardiogenic shock (4.6% vs 1.7%, P < .001), and death (4.1% vs 2.2%, P = .014) at 90 days. After multivariable adjustment, LVEDP was associated with increased risk of mortality through 90 days (adjusted hazard ratio 1.22, 95% CI 1.02-1.46, per 5-mmHg increase, P = .044) and the composite of death, cardiogenic shock, or CHF within the first 2 days (adjusted hazard ratio 1.40, 95% CI 1.23-1.59, per 5-mm Hg increase, P < .001), but not from day 3 to 90 (P = .25). CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure measured during primary PCI for STEMI is an independent predictor of inhospital and longer term cardiovascular outcomes. Measuring LVEDP may be useful to stratify patient risk and guide postinfarct treatment.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Ventrículos do Coração/fisiopatologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Anticorpos de Cadeia Única/uso terapêutico , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Am Heart J ; 164(1): 43-51, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22795281

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Reasons for pexelizumab lack of benefit in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention remain unclear. In a substudy of the APEX-AMI trial, we explored the hypothesis that early complement activation preceding drug administration explained the failure. METHODS: A panel of terminal complement complex proteins and fragments and biomarkers of inflammation, apoptosis, and high-risk features were assessed in serum obtained before and 24 hours after administration of placebo or pexelizumab and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 356) and in human umbilical vein endothelial cell cultures coincubated with serum (n = 45). RESULTS: In the placebo group, C5a and sC5b-9 levels increased by 37% (7.9-14.2 ηg/mL, P = .007) and 96% (442-845 ηg/mL, P < .0001), respectively, during the first 24 hours. Pexelizumab prevented the increase in C5a (P = .01 vs placebo), but not that of sC5b-9 (502-1,157 ηg/mL, not significant vs placebo). Levels of C-reactive protein, interleukin (IL) 6, IL-1ß, Regulated on Activation, Normal T Cell Expressed and Secreted (RANTES) or Chemokine C-C motif ligand 5 (CCL5), and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide increased significantly in both groups; those of IL-10, IL-12, IL-1ra, and Interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (IP-10) or C-X-C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL10) decreased. Pexelizumab halved the increase in IL-6 (+92% vs 156%, P = .01) without effects on other markers, including C-reactive protein and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide. In cell culture, pexelizumab inhibited C5a, sC5b-9, and membrane-bound C5b-9 by 92%, 75%, and 78%, respectively (all P < .0001), without influencing cytokine levels and cell apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS: The blockage of both C5a and terminal complement in cell culture, but of C5a only in vivo with minimal effects on inflammation and risk biomarkers, supports the hypothesis that late administration of pexelizumab after the ischemia/reperfusion insult precluded adequate myocardial protection, resulting in a negative trial.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Complexo de Ataque à Membrana do Sistema Complemento/antagonistas & inibidores , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Anticorpos de Cadeia Única/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Falha de Tratamento
8.
Am Heart J ; 162(1): 89-97, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21742094

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mortality after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has reduced with reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), which may have impacted on the adverse outcomes of cardiogenic shock (CS) and congestive heart failure (CHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: In the APEX-AMI trial, 5,745 patients with STEMI and planned primary PCI were randomly assigned pexelizumab or matching placebo. Post-randomization CS or CHF was adjudicated by a clinical endpoints committee. Treatment assignment to pexelizumab did not influence either endpoint or mortality rates. Cardiogenic shock developed in 196 patients (3.4%) at a median of 6.0 hours (interquartile range 3.9-28.3) post-randomization, and mortality at 90 days was 54.6%. Congestive heart failure occurred in 254 of patients (4.4%) at a median of 2.6 days (IQR 1.0-16.6), and mortality through 90 days was 10.2%; mortality among those with neither endpoint was 2.1%. Patients with CS or CHF were older, were more often female, and had more hypertension and diabetes, but smoked less compared with non-CS/CHF patients (all P < .05). Independent mortality predictors among those with CS or CHF were hyperlipidemia and a history of angina (interaction P = .011 and .008, respectively); procedural predictors among survivors to PCI were pre-PCI Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow 0-1 and post-PCI TIMI flow <3 (P = .013 and <.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Survival after CS remains poor despite aggressive reperfusion. Both CS and CHF remain the major causes of death among STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Future studies should examine treatments that aim to reduce mortality in these highest risk patients.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Eletrocardiografia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Choque Cardiogênico/prevenção & controle , Anticorpos de Cadeia Única/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Seguimentos , Saúde Global , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Injeções Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Choque Cardiogênico/epidemiologia , Choque Cardiogênico/etiologia , Anticorpos de Cadeia Única/administração & dosagem , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências
9.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 4(2): 183-92, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21304097

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior studies demonstrate a direct relationship between treatment delays to primary percutaneous intervention and mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This analysis compared the relationship of symptom onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time on mortality in patients with STEMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed different treatment delays (symptom onset-to-balloon time, door-to-balloon time) and mortality in 5745 STEMI patients. Baseline characteristics, flow grade, 90-day mortality, and clinical outcomes were compared in patients stratified by treatment delay. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed to assess the independent and relative effect of each treatment delay on 90-day mortality. Female sex, increased age, and worse thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade were significantly associated with longer symptom onset-to-balloon times and door-to-balloon times. Longer symptom onset-to-balloon time was significantly associated with worse 90-day mortality (3.7%, 4.2%, and 6.5% for time delays <3 hours, 3 to 5 hours, and >5 hours, respectively, P<0.0001). Similarly, longer door-to-balloon times were significantly associated with worse 90-day mortality (3.2%, 4.0%, 4.6%, and 5.3% for delays <60 minutes, 60 to 90 minutes, 90 to 120 minutes, and ≥120 minutes respectively, P<0.0001). In a multivariate model of 90-day mortality, door-to-balloon time (χ(2) 6.0, P<0.014), and symptom onset-to-hospital arrival (χ(2) 9.8, P<0.007) remained independent determinants. CONCLUSIONS: Both symptom onset-to-balloon time and hospital door-to-balloon time are strongly associated with 90-day mortality following STEMI. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00091637.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Eletrocardiografia , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Anticorpos de Cadeia Única/uso terapêutico , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Complemento C5/antagonistas & inibidores , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 32(2): 178-87, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21220052

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Independent adjudication of clinical trial events is traditionally performed by physicians on a clinical event classification (CEC) committee. OBJECTIVES: The experience of the centralized CEC group of the APEX-AMI trial is described. This group adjudicated key secondary pre-specified outcome measures of congestive heart failure (CHF) and cardiogenic shock through 90 days using an algorithmic approach for some events. METHODS: Data were collected via an electronic data capture (EDC) tool on all subjects, and additional information was provided via EDC for patients identified by site investigators with CHF or shock. Two strategies were used to adjudicate potential events: 1) a computer algorithm (followed by physician confirmation) analyzed data to determine whether events met trial end point definitions; or 2) physician review was used if EDC data were inadequate to allow classification by algorithm. RESULTS: Of 5745 patients, 282 suspected cardiogenic shock and 465 suspected CHF events were identified. The computer algorithm or physicians confirmed 196/282 cardiogenic shock and 277/465 CHF end points. Overall, 242/742 (32.6%) of suspected events were classified by algorithm. Of the 500 events not resolved by computer algorithm, the CEC physicians agreed with site investigator assessments in 126/277 (45%) of CHF and 151/196 (77%) of cardiogenic shock events. The CEC committee completed adjudication of all suspected 30- and 90-day CHF and cardiogenic shock events within 7 days of the last patient 30-day follow-up visit and within 1 day of the last patient 90-day follow-up visit. Only 27% of patients required source document collection in addition to EDC-collected information. CONCLUSIONS: A complementary approach of a computerized assessment and physician review was used in the CEC effort of the APEX-AMI trial. The algorithm categorized approximately one third of suspected CHF/cardiogenic shock events. The APEX-AMI CEC experience shows that an algorithmic approach may be a useful strategy for end point evaluation but requires validation.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapêutico , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Anticorpos de Cadeia Única/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Bloqueio de Ramo/tratamento farmacológico , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Método Duplo-Cego , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/normas , Choque Cardiogênico/diagnóstico , Anticorpos de Cadeia Única/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo
11.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 3(5): 414-22, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20858863

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Accurate models to predict mortality are needed for risk stratification in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 5745 patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI in the Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial within 6 hours of symptom onset. A Cox proportional hazards model incorporating regression splines to accommodate nonlinearity in the log hazard ratio (HR) scale was used to determine baseline independent predictors of 90-day mortality. At 90 days, 271 (4.7%) of 5745 patients died. Independent correlates of 90-day mortality were (in descending order of statistical significance) age (HR, 2.03/10-y increments; 95% CI, 1.80 to 2.29), systolic blood pressure (HR, 0.86/10-mm Hg increments; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.90), Killip class (class 3 or 4 versus 1 or 2) (HR, 4.24; 95% CI, 2.97 to 6.08), heart rate (>70 beats per minute) (HR, 1.45/10-beat increments; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.59), creatinine (HR, 1.23/10-µmol/L increments >90 µmol/L; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.34), sum of ST-segment deviations (HR, 1.25/10-mm increments; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.40), and anterior STEMI location (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.93) (c-index, 0.82). Internal validation with bootstrapping confirmed minimal overoptimism (c-index, 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a practical method to assess intermediate-term prognosis of patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, using baseline clinical and ECG variables. This model identifies key factors affecting prognosis and enables quantitative risk stratification that may be helpful in guiding clinical care and for risk adjustment for observational analyses.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Anticorpos de Cadeia Única/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
12.
Am Heart J ; 160(2): 272-8, 2010 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20691832

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine predictors of 90-day left ventricular function following acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) using variables from clinical presentation, biomarker testing, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). BACKGROUND: Identifying patients with acute STEMI who experience adverse remodeling and develop left ventricular dysfunction 3 months post-MI is a priority for guiding subsequent therapy. METHODS: The Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction trial tested pexelizumab treatment in STEMI patients presenting within 6 hours of symptom onset who were to undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention. We studied 64 patients within this trial according to a prespecified substudy that included paired core laboratory delayed-enhancement CMR at days 3 and 90 as well as plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; in picograms per milliliter) measured at randomization and 24 hours. A multivariable model predicting day 90 left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was developed from clinical, biomarker, and imaging findings. RESULTS: Patients had a median age of 60 years (52-68), 89% were male, and 60% had anterior STEMI. Time from symptom onset to percutaneous coronary intervention was 3 hours. The median baseline LVEF was 48% (38%-56%) and was 50% (40%-54%) at 90 days: 7 patients (11%) had an LVEF <35% at 90 days. Patients with a lower 90-day LVEF (as a continuous variable) had a higher 24-hour NT-proBNP (P = .02) and a larger baseline infarct size by CMR (median 15% LV [8%-20% LV]) (P < .01). Microvascular obstruction (no reflow) was greater as measured by CMR (median 2.8% [1.4%-6.1%]) in patients with a lower 90-day LVEF (P < .01). Median baseline and 24-hour NT-proBNP levels were 94 pg/mL (54-292 pg/mL) and 1,448 pg/mL (958-2,599 pg/mL), respectively. In a multivariable model with clinical, biomarker, and imaging variables, only 3 variables independently predicted 90-day LVEF: 24-hour NT-proBNP, baseline CMR infarct size, and microvascular obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Three key pathophysiologic variables of the post-STEMI myocardium measuring baseline infarct size and the extent of microvascular obstruction on CMR and wall tension (24-hour NT-proBNP) independently predicted 90-day LVEF. Further studies linking these measures with earlier use of clinical therapies may be warranted.


Assuntos
Infarto do Miocárdio/patologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/epidemiologia , Remodelação Ventricular , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Biomarcadores/sangue , Angiografia Coronária , Feminino , Humanos , Imagem Cinética por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Peptídeo Natriurético Encefálico/sangue , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/sangue , Precursores de Proteínas/sangue , Medição de Risco , Anticorpos de Cadeia Única/uso terapêutico , Volume Sistólico
13.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 3(2): 135-42, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20160159

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The 2007 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women drew heavily on results from randomized clinical trials; however, representation of women in trials of cardiovascular disease prevention has not been systematically assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS: We abstracted 156 randomized clinical trials cited by the 2007 women's prevention guidelines to determine female representation over time and by clinical indication, prevention type, location of trial conduct, and funding source. Both women and men were represented in 135 of 156 (86.5%) trials; 20 trials enrolled only men; 1 enrolled only women. Among all trials, the proportion of women increased significantly over time, from 9% in 1970 to 41% in 2006. Considering only trials that enrolled both women and men, female enrollment was 18% in 1970 and increased to 34% in 2006. Female representation was higher in international versus United States-only trials (32.7% versus 26.7%) and primary versus secondary prevention trials (42.6% versus 26.6%). Female enrollment was comparable in government/foundation-funded versus industry-funded trials (31.9% versus 31.5%). Representation of women was highest among trials in hypertension (44%), diabetes (40%), and stroke (38%) and lowest for heart failure (29%), coronary artery disease (25%), and hyperlipidemia (28%). By contrast, women accounted for 53% of all individuals with hypertension, 50% with diabetes, 51% with heart failure, 49% with hyperlipidemia, and 46% with coronary artery disease. Sex-specific results were discussed in only 31% of primary trial publications. CONCLUSIONS: Enrollment of women in randomized clinical trials has increased over time but remains low relative to their overall representation in disease populations. Efforts are needed to reach a level of representation that is adequate to ensure evidence-based sex-specific recommendations.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Seleção de Pacientes , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Sujeitos da Pesquisa , Serviços de Saúde da Mulher , Saúde da Mulher , Fatores Etários , American Heart Association , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Indústria Farmacêutica/economia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Financiamento Governamental , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prevenção Primária , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/economia , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto , Prevenção Secundária , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
14.
Ann Emerg Med ; 39(2): 123-30, 2002 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11823765

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Early treatment with fibrinolytic therapy substantially decreases mortality in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We examined delays to hospital arrival and treatment in 2 large, multinational, randomized trials of fibrinolytic therapy: Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) and Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-III). METHODS: We evaluated delays to hospital arrival, time from arrival to treatment, and total time to treatment in the 27,849 US patients with AMI enrolled in GUSTO-I or GUSTO-III. Time intervals were defined prospectively for total time to treatment and symptom onset to hospital arrival as 0 to 2 hours (early), 2 to 4 hours, or more than 4 hours (late). Time to fibrinolytic therapy once in hospital was prospectively defined as 0 to 1 hour (early) or more than 1 hour (late). Socioeconomic data were also obtained from patients enrolled in the GUSTO-III trial. RESULTS: In GUSTO-III, as in GUSTO-I, patients who arrived at the hospital later were older (64 years versus 60 years; P =.001) and more often female (35% versus 27%; P =.001), black (6% versus 4%; P =.02), and diabetic (25% versus 16%; P =.001). These groups also received treatment later once in hospital, as did patients with hypertension (48% versus 42%; P =.001), previous angina (46% versus 36%; P =.001), and previous infarction (21% versus 16%; P =.001). Higher levels of education, professional occupations, and private health insurance were associated with significantly earlier arrival and treatment. Although in hospital time to treatment has decreased (66 minutes to 48 minutes; P <.0001), time to arrival has not changed over the past 7 years, averaging 84 minutes. CONCLUSION: Certain groups of patients with AMI, including the elderly, women, diabetic patients, and minorities, exhibit delays to hospital arrival and treatment in the emergency setting. Patients with higher educational levels, professional occupations, and private health insurance arrive at the hospital sooner and receive treatment more quickly. Patients and health care providers must be educated regarding high-risk populations for delay to maximize benefit from fibrinolytic therapy.


Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Estreptoquinase/uso terapêutico , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Distribuição por Sexo , Classe Social , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA