Impact of changes to national UK Guidance on testing for gestational diabetes screening during a pandemic: a single-centre observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the differences in detection rate for gestational diabetes (GDM) comparing the methodology recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) compared with testing described as appropriate during the Covid-19 pandemic by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). DESIGN: Cohort study of women delivering between 1 January 2016 and 1 July 2020. SETTING: London Teaching Hospital. POPULATION: All women delivering between 1 January 2016 and 13 May 2020 and follow up of women screening negative between 1 April 2020 and 13 May 2020. METHODS: Retrospective study of prospectively collected data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Detection rate of gestational diabetes. RESULTS: Using the RCOG guidance, the overall rate of women identified as having gestational diabetes fell from 7.7% (1853/24168) to 4.2% (35/831)(P = 0.0003). Of 230 women who tested negative according to the RCOG criteria from 1 April to 13 May but who subsequently had an oral glucose tolerance test, 47 (20.4%) were diagnosed as having gestational diabetes according to the NICE criteria. CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, the RCOG Covid-19 gestational diabetes screening regime failed to detect 47 of 82 (57%) women subsequently identified as gestational diabetics, and therefore cannot be recommended for general use. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Screening for GDM using RCOG Covid criteria reduced detection rates.

Computerised analysis of intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns and adverse outcomes in the INFANT trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess if a computerised decision support system reliably identified abnormal fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns in fetuses with adverse neonatal outcomes in the INFANT trial, and whether its use reduced substandard care. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study within a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Twenty-four maternity units in the UK and Ireland. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: A total of 46 614 labours between January 6 2010 and August 31 2013 in the INFANT trial. METHODS: Panel review of intrapartum and neonatal care in infants with adverse outcome, and an assessment of the effectiveness of computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate in reducing substandard care. Descriptive analysis of other factors associated with adverse outcome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence and detection rate of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns, other characteristics associated with perinatal adverse outcome, and frequency of substandard care. RESULTS: Computer interpretation of FHR patterns was deemed to be completely valid in only 24 of 71 (33.8%) cases of adverse outcome. On a scale of 0-10 (completely invalid to completely valid), 28 cases (39.4%) had a score of 6 or less, mainly due to lack of recognition of decelerations (15 cases), or reduced variability (seven cases), or failure to recognise tachysystole (five cases). There were multiple associated factors that modified the clinical assessment of FHR patterns. There was substandard care in 45/71 cases (63%). CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns were not detected accurately by computer analysis, and its use did not reduce the incidence of substandard care. FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme (project number 06.38.01). TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Improved recognition of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns is insufficient to reduce the incidence of substandard care.

Assessment of cardiotocographs.

In recent years advances in medical electronic equipment for monitoring, diagnosis and treatment of patients have led to a large increase in the number and variety of instrumentation available to the medical profession. There is a considerable amount of duplication of equipment and in the absence of readily available information buyers are unlikely to make informed decisions about the ideal instrument for their particular circumstances. One method of increasing the users' awareness is a comparative, independent assessment of equipment, with the results disseminated to the interested parties. This paper describes the essential qualities of cardiotocographs: how they are assessed as part of the UK Department of Health's evaluation programme and the measures to inform users of the latest evaluation information.