Evaluation of Quality of Life: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy after Thoracic Sympathectomy for Palmar Hyperhidrosis.

BACKGROUND: Primary hyperhidrosis is a condition that significantly decreases the quality of life (QOL). Thoracic sympathectomy is safe and efficient method of treatment in palmar hyperhidrosis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the change in QOL in patients with palmar hyperhidrosis who underwent thoracic sympathectomy. METHODS: The study includes 149 patients (37 men and 112 women) who were treated with bilateral thoracoscopic sympathectomy for primary palmar hyperhidrosis. Subjective and objective evaluation of hyperhidrosis were performed prior to the surgery, 3 and 12 months after the treatment. Control group consists of 305 healthy volunteers (118 men and 187 women). The QOL was measured using Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) scale. RESULTS: The average level of palmar hyperhidrosis in the study group prior to surgery was 224.69 ± 179.20 mg/min/m2. General QOL (FACIT total) before the surgery was significantly lower in the study group when compared with the control group (66.57 ± 16.33 vs. 91.29 ± 11.13; p < 0.05). Three months after surgery level of hyperhidrosis decreased significantly and remained at similar level 12 months after the procedure (13.55 ± 15.41 mg/min/m2 p < 0.05 and 14.41 ± 18.19 mg/min/m2 p < 0.05, respectively). After thoracoscopic sympathectomy, the QOL increased and did not differ when compared with the control group 3 and 12 months after the surgery (90.28 ± 11.13 vs. 91.29 ± 11.13; p = 0.55 and 89.59 ± 11.34 vs. 91.29 ± 11.13; p = 0.84, respectively). The highest increase was observed in functional well-being domain (32.25%); however, it was also noticeable in other domains. CONCLUSION: Thoracic sympathectomy is an efficient method of treatment in palmar hyperhidrosis which significantly increases patients' QOL especially in a functional domain.

Is subjective hyperhidrosis assessment sufficient enough? prevalence of hyperhidrosis among young Polish adults.

The aim of this work was to assess the prevalence of palmar and axillary hyperhidrosis among young Polish adults. Additionally, this work aimed at comparing the subjective and objective (gravimetric) method of hyperhidrosis assessment. Healthy medical students, volunteering to take part in this study, were included. The participants filled out a questionnaire assessing the occurrence and subjective intensity of hyperhidrosis in different areas of the body. Additionally, the students were subjected to gravimetric assessment in four localizations: the face, palms, axillae and abdomino-lumbar area. Two hundred and fifty-three students (102 males and 151 females, mean age 24.3 ± 3.21 years) were included in the study. Forty-two (16.7%) participants declared that they suffer from hyperhidrosis. Out of the 42 students declaring any type of hyperhidrosis, only 20 (47.6%) exceeded the gravimetric reference values. From among the students that exceeded the normative values for palmar hyperhidrosis, only 10 (55.6%) were aware of their hyperhidrosis. In the group of students that exceeded the normative values for axillary hyperhidrosis, 16 (39%) were aware of their hyperhidrosis. Subjectively declared hyperhidrosis incidence may significantly exceed the real-life occurrence of this disease. Basing studies solely on data gathered from questionnaires, may lead to false results. It is imperative, when assessing patients suffering from hyperhidrosis, to use both objective and subjective methods of evaluation.

Gravimetry in sweating assessment in primary hyperhidrosis and healthy individuals.

OBJECTIVE: Though hyperhidrosis is generally considered a subjectively perceived disease, it seems more and more doubtful that merely subjective evaluation is sufficient to qualify the patient to surgery. The aim of this study was to develop further gravimetry as a method of evaluation of sweating intensity and determination of the applicability of it in post-operative follow-up of primary hyperhidrosis (PHH) patients. METHODS: Total of 1,485 gravimetry assays has been performed in 343 patients treated for hyperhidrosis and in 220 healthy volunteers. In all of the subjects the measurements were taken from four localizations (face, hands, armpits and trunk) and normalized by body surface of the participant. The measurements were taken twice for every participant to obtain test-retest correlations. Mean values and standard deviations (SD) have been evaluated and on that basis reference values were quantified. Thresholds for diagnosis of hyperhidrosis were quantified on the basis of normal distribution theory as healthy population mean +2 SD. RESULTS: In healthy volunteers, mean value of gravimetrically evaluated intensity of sweating were: facial: 19.15 ± 14.97 mg/min/m(2), palmar: 18.49 ± 14.06 mg/min/m(2), axillary: 42.39 ± 47.08 mg/min/m(2) and plantar: 15.77 ± 16.87 mg/min/m(2). Thresholds for diagnosis of hyperhidrosis were quantified, respectively as: 49, 46, 136 and 50 mg/min/m(2). The overall test-retest correlation was 0.71. INTERPRETATION: Gravimetry is easy, reproducible and fast method of evaluation of sweating. The reference values are stable and can serve as a qualifying and follow-up tool for evaluation of the patients with PHH in any localization.