Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32121335

RESUMO

Social, economic, and environmental differences across the European Union significantly affect opportunities to move forward in achieving greater equity in health. Cohesion Policy (CP) funds can contribute positively through investments in the main determinants of health. The aim of this study is to analyze to what extent the planned investments for 2014-2020 are addressing the regional health gaps, in light of the population health index (PHI), a multidimensional measure developed by the EURO-HEALTHY project. The operational programs of all regions were analyzed, namely, the CP planned investments by field of intervention. Analysis of variance was performed to examine whether the regional scores in the PHI dimensions were statistically different across regions with different levels of development (measured by gross domestic product (GDP)). Results show that 98% of regions with worse performances on the PHI are less developed regions. Overall, all regions present planned investments in intervention fields linked to dimensions appraised within the PHI (e.g., employment, income, education, pollution). Yet, more needs to be done to focus regional investments in health determinants where regions still lag behind. The PHI has the potential to inform future CP restructuring, providing evidence to extend the current eligibility criteria to other dimensions beyond the GDP.


Assuntos
Administração Financeira , Política de Saúde , Saúde da População , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Renda , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto Jovem
2.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 18(1): 18, 2020 Feb 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32054540

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Population health measurements are recognised as appropriate tools to support public health monitoring. Yet, there is still a lack of tools that offer a basis for policy appraisal and for foreseeing impacts on health equity. In the context of persistent regional inequalities, it is critical to ascertain which regions are performing best, which factors might shape future health outcomes and where there is room for improvement. METHODS: Under the EURO-HEALTHY project, tools combining the technical elements of multi-criteria value models and the social elements of participatory processes were developed to measure health in multiple dimensions and to inform policies. The flagship tool is the Population Health Index (PHI), a multidimensional measure that evaluates health from the lens of equity in health determinants and health outcomes, further divided into sub-indices. Foresight tools for policy analysis were also developed, namely: (1) scenarios of future patterns of population health in Europe in 2030, combining group elicitation with the Extreme-World method and (2) a multi-criteria evaluation framework informing policy appraisal (case study of Lisbon). Finally, a WebGIS was built to map and communicate the results to wider audiences. RESULTS: The Population Health Index was applied to all European Union (EU) regions, indicating which regions are lagging behind and where investments are most needed to close the health gap. Three scenarios for 2030 were produced - (1) the 'Failing Europe' scenario (worst case/increasing inequalities), (2) the 'Sustainable Prosperity' scenario (best case/decreasing inequalities) and (3) the 'Being Stuck' scenario (the EU and Member States maintain the status quo). Finally, the policy appraisal exercise conducted in Lisbon illustrates which policies have higher potential to improve health and how their feasibility can change according to different scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: The article makes a theoretical and practical contribution to the field of population health. Theoretically, it contributes to the conceptualisation of health in a broader sense by advancing a model able to integrate multiple aspects of health, including health outcomes and multisectoral determinants. Empirically, the model and tools are closely tied to what is measurable when using the EU context but offering opportunities to be upscaled to other settings.


Assuntos
Equidade em Saúde/organização & administração , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos/normas , Administração em Saúde Pública/normas , Meio Ambiente , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Equidade em Saúde/normas , Política de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Formulação de Políticas , Segurança , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/normas , Fatores Socioeconômicos
3.
Popul Health Metr ; 17(1): 11, 2019 08 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31391120

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The ability to measure regional health inequalities across Europe and to build adequate population health indices depends significantly on the availability of reliable and comparable data at the regional level. Within the scope of the EU-funded project EURO-HEALTHY, a Population Health Index (PHI) was built. This model aggregates 39 indicators considered relevant by experts and stakeholders to evaluate and monitor population health on the regional level within the European Union (269 regions). The aim of this research was to assess the data availability for those indicators. As a subsequent aim, an adequate protocol to overcome issues arising from missing data will be presented, as well as key messages for both national and European statistical authorities meant to improve data collection on population health. METHODS: The methodology for the study includes three consecutive phases: (i) assessing the data availability for the respective indicators at the regional level for the last year available (ii) applying a protocol for missing data and completing the database and (iii) developing a scoring system ranging from 0 (no data available; worst) to 1 (all data available; best) to evaluate the availability of data by indicator and EU region. RESULTS: Although the missing data on the set of the PHI indicators was significant, the mean availability score for the EURO-HEALTHY PHI indicators is 0.8 and the regional availability score is 0.7, which reveal the strength of the indicators as well as the data completeness protocol for missing data. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive data availability assessment for population health indicators from multiple areas of concern, at the EU regional level. The results highlight that the data completeness protocol and availability scores are suitable tools to apply on any indicator's data source mapping. It also raises awareness to the urgent need for sub-national data in several domains and for closing the data gaps between and within countries. This will require policies clearly focused on improving equity between regions and a coordinated effort from the producers of data (the EU28 national statistics offices and EUROSTAT) and the stakeholders who design policies at EU, regional and local level.


Assuntos
Acesso à Informação , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Saúde da População , Crime , Coleta de Dados , Educação , Emprego , União Europeia , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Gastos em Saúde , Recursos em Saúde , Humanos , Renda , Estilo de Vida , Morbidade , Mortalidade , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Saneamento , Condições Sociais , Gerenciamento de Resíduos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA