RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: As satisfaction with information received is an important precondition of adherence to treatment in cancer patients, we aimed to examine the level of perceived information, information satisfaction and information needs, and examine the prospective association between information satisfaction and anxiety. METHODS: In a multicenter study in Germany, 1398 cancer patients were evaluated in terms of this at baseline, after 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: At baseline, the majority of patients reported to feel well-informed. Nevertheless, a considerable proportion reported to wish more information. The proportion of patients reporting unmet information needs declined over time (pâ¯<â¯0.001). Anxiety at baseline is negatively associated with information satisfaction after 6 months (ßâ¯=â¯-0.10, pâ¯<â¯0.01). Conversely, information satisfaction at baseline is negatively associated with anxiety after 6 months (ßâ¯=â¯-0.10, pâ¯<â¯0.01). At 12 months, only the negative path leading from anxiety to information satisfaction was significant (ßâ¯=â¯-0.12, pâ¯<â¯0.01). CONCLUSION: We found high levels of information received and high information satisfaction. Nevertheless, there was a considerable quantity of unmet information needs. A bidirectional relationship between information satisfaction and anxiety symptoms emerged after 6 months. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: These results underline the priority of providing information and emotional support to cancer patients to improve satisfaction with information.
Assuntos
Depressão , Neoplasias , Ansiedade , Alemanha , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The INTERMED- interview (IM-CAG=INTERMED complexity assessment grid) is a well validated instrument for the identification of complex patients in need of integrated health care (score ≥21). The IM-SA (INTERMED self-assessment)-questionnaire, derived from the INTERMED- interview, was developed in cooperation with the international INTERMED group in order to facilitate its use in various clinical settings and to foster the patients' perspective on health-care needs. METHODS: The German version of the IM-SA was evaluated in a clinical sample (n=136) of psychosomatic outpatients and compared to the IM-CAG. Construct validity was examined by analyzing the correlations of the IM-SA with quality-of-life (SF-36) and anxiety/depression (HADS). Sensitivity and specificity for the identification of complex patients were examined by using ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis. RESULTS: The correlations between the total score and the subscales of the IM-SA, compared to the INTERMED, were high (total score r=0.79 (95%-KI: [0.70; 0.85]). Cronbach's α was 0.77, and construct validity was high (SF-36 mental component score: r=-0.57; HADS Depression: r=0.59). The IM-SA total score was significantly lower compared to IM-CAG, mainly because of low IM-SA scores in the somatic domain. According to ROC analysis, the IM-SA-cut-off for identifying complex patients has to be lowered (score ≥17). DISCUSSION: The IM-SA can be used as an instrument to identify complex patients in need of integrated bio-psycho-social care. CONCLUSION: The IM-SA is a reliable instrument to be used in various clinical settings to identify complex patients and to provide integrated, bio-psycho-social care.
Assuntos
Transtornos de Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Ansiedade/psicologia , Comparação Transcultural , Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Psicometria/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Psicofisiológicos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Psicofisiológicos/psicologia , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , Feminino , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida/psicologiaRESUMO
In the German DRG system the funding of CL services is not ensured. The documentation of psychiatric comorbidity and CL care delivery is a pre-condition to the development of funding models for CL-services. A task force of several German psychosomatic associations (German College of Psychosomatic Medicine, German Society of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, General Medical Society for Psychotherapy) developed a new documentation form for CL-services (CL-BaDo). The pilot study explored the multicenter implementation of CL-BaDo and the use of the documentation form for quality management and cost calculation. Over a period of at least three months, participating CL-services documented all CL cases consecutively with the CL-BaDo. One site applied full electronic data processing. 2116 CL cases from eight psychosomatic CL-services were analysed. The CL-BaDo is a time-efficient, feasible and acceptable documentation form for CL-service delivery. The full electronic data processing enables networking with a hospital information system to produce higher data quality. The data of CL-BaDo can be used locally for quality management, development of management strategies and communication with consultants, as well as nationwide for health policy questions and research.